Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

[Comparison between the risk of mobbing at work and conditions of job strain and effort-reward imbalance in relation to stress-related disorders: a study in the public administration].
Med Lav 2013 Jan-Feb; 104(1):44-54ML

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A limitation of previous research on mobbing at work was that the individual consequences of the phenomenon were often assessed on 'clinical' samples of victims. Studies in organizations are less numerous and those available rarely evaluated the potential effect of mobbing over and above that of other psychosocial factors which provided robust evidence of adverse health effects.

OBJECTIVES

The relationship between exposure to mobbing and stress-related psychophysical conditions was investigated taking in consideration the possible concomitant exposure to job strain and effort-reward imbalance.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study on public administration administrative employees (No. = 538, 48% women). The psychosocial factors considered were assessed by means of well known and validated scales. The four health outcomes considered were psychological caseness (as operationalized by means of the general health questionnaire-12-item version), depression, gastritis and colitis/irritable colon syndrome as indicated by having reported a medical diagnosis of such conditions. Covariates: gender, age, body mass index, smoking habits and experience of a traumatic event in the last year. Analysis consisted of a series of logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Exposure to mobbing was significantly associated with all the outcomes considered over and above the covariates. The inclusion in the models of job strain and effort-reward imbalance did not substantially alter the results.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between mobbing at work and health outcomes is not confounded by concomitant exposure to job strain and effort-reward imbalance. These results offer further confirmation of the uniqueness of mobbing as a psychosocial risk factor.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Università degli Studi di Bologna, Università degli Studi di Trento. cristian.balducci3@unibo.itNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article

Language

ita

PubMed ID

23520886

Citation

Balducci, C, and E Fraccaroli. "[Comparison Between the Risk of Mobbing at Work and Conditions of Job Strain and Effort-reward Imbalance in Relation to Stress-related Disorders: a Study in the Public Administration]." La Medicina Del Lavoro, vol. 104, no. 1, 2013, pp. 44-54.
Balducci C, Fraccaroli E. [Comparison between the risk of mobbing at work and conditions of job strain and effort-reward imbalance in relation to stress-related disorders: a study in the public administration]. Med Lav. 2013;104(1):44-54.
Balducci, C., & Fraccaroli, E. (2013). [Comparison between the risk of mobbing at work and conditions of job strain and effort-reward imbalance in relation to stress-related disorders: a study in the public administration]. La Medicina Del Lavoro, 104(1), pp. 44-54.
Balducci C, Fraccaroli E. [Comparison Between the Risk of Mobbing at Work and Conditions of Job Strain and Effort-reward Imbalance in Relation to Stress-related Disorders: a Study in the Public Administration]. Med Lav. 2013;104(1):44-54. PubMed PMID: 23520886.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - [Comparison between the risk of mobbing at work and conditions of job strain and effort-reward imbalance in relation to stress-related disorders: a study in the public administration]. AU - Balducci,C, AU - Fraccaroli,E, PY - 2013/3/26/entrez PY - 2013/3/26/pubmed PY - 2013/5/18/medline SP - 44 EP - 54 JF - La Medicina del lavoro JO - Med Lav VL - 104 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: A limitation of previous research on mobbing at work was that the individual consequences of the phenomenon were often assessed on 'clinical' samples of victims. Studies in organizations are less numerous and those available rarely evaluated the potential effect of mobbing over and above that of other psychosocial factors which provided robust evidence of adverse health effects. OBJECTIVES: The relationship between exposure to mobbing and stress-related psychophysical conditions was investigated taking in consideration the possible concomitant exposure to job strain and effort-reward imbalance. METHODS: Cross-sectional study on public administration administrative employees (No. = 538, 48% women). The psychosocial factors considered were assessed by means of well known and validated scales. The four health outcomes considered were psychological caseness (as operationalized by means of the general health questionnaire-12-item version), depression, gastritis and colitis/irritable colon syndrome as indicated by having reported a medical diagnosis of such conditions. Covariates: gender, age, body mass index, smoking habits and experience of a traumatic event in the last year. Analysis consisted of a series of logistic regressions. RESULTS: Exposure to mobbing was significantly associated with all the outcomes considered over and above the covariates. The inclusion in the models of job strain and effort-reward imbalance did not substantially alter the results. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between mobbing at work and health outcomes is not confounded by concomitant exposure to job strain and effort-reward imbalance. These results offer further confirmation of the uniqueness of mobbing as a psychosocial risk factor. SN - 0025-7818 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23520886/[Comparison_between_the_risk_of_mobbing_at_work_and_conditions_of_job_strain_and_effort_reward_imbalance_in_relation_to_stress_related_disorders:_a_study_in_the_public_administration]_ L2 - https://medlineplus.gov/bullyingandcyberbullying.html DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -