Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

An in vitro comparison of microleakage of two self-etched adhesive and the one-bottle adhesive used in pit and fissure sealant with or without saliva contamination.
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Nov-Dec; 23(6):806-10.IJ

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To minimize the deleterious effects of contaminated enamel on bonding, some authors have advocated the use of adhesive systems under the sealant. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of two self-etch and the one-bottle adhesive used in pit and fissure sealant with or without saliva contamination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty extracted premolar teeth were assigned to the six groups. Group 1: Acid +saliva +single bond +sealant, Group 2: Acid +single bond +sealant, Group 3: Saliva +S (3) bond +sealant, Group 4: S (3) bond +sealant, Group 5: Saliva +protect bond +sealant, Group 6: Protect bond +sealant. The teeth were thermocycled and immersed in 2% basic fuchsine dye for 24 h, then sectioned and examined with a stereomicroscope under ×40 magnification. The results were evaluated with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests.

RESULTS

Group 2 has the lower microleakage scores than Groups 4 and 6. Also, Group 6 has the lower microleakage scores than Group 4, and generally an increase in microleakage was observed in each group related to contamination.

CONCLUSION

The best technique of sealant therapy in saliva contaminated and non- contaminated condition is the use of acid-etching and bonding agent.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

23649068

Citation

Bassir, Leila, et al. "An in Vitro Comparison of Microleakage of Two Self-etched Adhesive and the One-bottle Adhesive Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant With or Without Saliva Contamination." Indian Journal of Dental Research : Official Publication of Indian Society for Dental Research, vol. 23, no. 6, 2012, pp. 806-10.
Bassir L, Khanehmasjedi M, Nasr E, et al. An in vitro comparison of microleakage of two self-etched adhesive and the one-bottle adhesive used in pit and fissure sealant with or without saliva contamination. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(6):806-10.
Bassir, L., Khanehmasjedi, M., Nasr, E., & Kaviani, A. (2012). An in vitro comparison of microleakage of two self-etched adhesive and the one-bottle adhesive used in pit and fissure sealant with or without saliva contamination. Indian Journal of Dental Research : Official Publication of Indian Society for Dental Research, 23(6), 806-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.111267
Bassir L, et al. An in Vitro Comparison of Microleakage of Two Self-etched Adhesive and the One-bottle Adhesive Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant With or Without Saliva Contamination. Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(6):806-10. PubMed PMID: 23649068.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - An in vitro comparison of microleakage of two self-etched adhesive and the one-bottle adhesive used in pit and fissure sealant with or without saliva contamination. AU - Bassir,Leila, AU - Khanehmasjedi,Mashaallah, AU - Nasr,Ehsan, AU - Kaviani,Azita, PY - 2013/5/8/entrez PY - 2013/5/8/pubmed PY - 2014/4/25/medline SP - 806 EP - 10 JF - Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research JO - Indian J Dent Res VL - 23 IS - 6 N2 - AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To minimize the deleterious effects of contaminated enamel on bonding, some authors have advocated the use of adhesive systems under the sealant. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of two self-etch and the one-bottle adhesive used in pit and fissure sealant with or without saliva contamination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted premolar teeth were assigned to the six groups. Group 1: Acid +saliva +single bond +sealant, Group 2: Acid +single bond +sealant, Group 3: Saliva +S (3) bond +sealant, Group 4: S (3) bond +sealant, Group 5: Saliva +protect bond +sealant, Group 6: Protect bond +sealant. The teeth were thermocycled and immersed in 2% basic fuchsine dye for 24 h, then sectioned and examined with a stereomicroscope under ×40 magnification. The results were evaluated with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests. RESULTS: Group 2 has the lower microleakage scores than Groups 4 and 6. Also, Group 6 has the lower microleakage scores than Group 4, and generally an increase in microleakage was observed in each group related to contamination. CONCLUSION: The best technique of sealant therapy in saliva contaminated and non- contaminated condition is the use of acid-etching and bonding agent. SN - 1998-3603 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23649068/An_in_vitro_comparison_of_microleakage_of_two_self_etched_adhesive_and_the_one_bottle_adhesive_used_in_pit_and_fissure_sealant_with_or_without_saliva_contamination_ L2 - http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2012;volume=23;issue=6;spage=806;epage=810;aulast=Bassir DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -