Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Little information comparing the fracture resistance of internal connection titanium and zirconia abutments exists to validate their use intraorally.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to determine the fracture resistance of internal connection titanium and zirconia abutments by simulating cyclic masticatory loads in vitro.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Twenty-two specimens simulating implant-supported anterior single crowns were randomly divided into 2 equal test groups: Group T with titanium abutments and Group Z with zirconia abutments. Abutments were attached to dental implants mounted in acrylic resin, and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) crowns were fabricated. Masticatory function was simulated by using cyclic loading in a stepped fatigue loading protocol until failure. Failed specimens were then analyzed by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic analysis. The load (N) and the number of cycles at which fracture occurred were collected and statistically analyzed by using a 2-sample t test (α=.05).
RESULTS
The titanium abutment group fractured at a mean (SD) load of 270 (56.7) N and a mean (SD) number of 81 935 (27 929) cycles. The zirconia abutment group fractured at a mean (SD) load of 140 (24.6) N and a mean (SD) number of 26 296 (9200) cycles. The differences between the groups were statistically significant for mean load and number of cycles (P<.001). For the titanium abutment specimens, multiple modes of failure occurred. The mode of failure of the zirconia abutments was fracture at the apical portion of the abutment without damage or plastic deformation of the abutment screw or implant.
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitations of this in vitro study, 1-piece zirconia abutments exhibited a significantly lower fracture resistance than titanium abutments. The mode of failure is specific to the abutment material and design, with the zirconia abutment fracturing before the retentive abutment screw.
Pub Type(s)
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
TY - JOUR
T1 - Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
AU - Foong,Jamie K W,
AU - Judge,Roy B,
AU - Palamara,Joseph E,
AU - Swain,Michael V,
PY - 2013/5/21/entrez
PY - 2013/5/21/pubmed
PY - 2014/2/22/medline
SP - 304
EP - 12
JF - The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
JO - J Prosthet Dent
VL - 109
IS - 5
N2 - STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little information comparing the fracture resistance of internal connection titanium and zirconia abutments exists to validate their use intraorally. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the fracture resistance of internal connection titanium and zirconia abutments by simulating cyclic masticatory loads in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-two specimens simulating implant-supported anterior single crowns were randomly divided into 2 equal test groups: Group T with titanium abutments and Group Z with zirconia abutments. Abutments were attached to dental implants mounted in acrylic resin, and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) crowns were fabricated. Masticatory function was simulated by using cyclic loading in a stepped fatigue loading protocol until failure. Failed specimens were then analyzed by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic analysis. The load (N) and the number of cycles at which fracture occurred were collected and statistically analyzed by using a 2-sample t test (α=.05). RESULTS: The titanium abutment group fractured at a mean (SD) load of 270 (56.7) N and a mean (SD) number of 81 935 (27 929) cycles. The zirconia abutment group fractured at a mean (SD) load of 140 (24.6) N and a mean (SD) number of 26 296 (9200) cycles. The differences between the groups were statistically significant for mean load and number of cycles (P<.001). For the titanium abutment specimens, multiple modes of failure occurred. The mode of failure of the zirconia abutments was fracture at the apical portion of the abutment without damage or plastic deformation of the abutment screw or implant. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, 1-piece zirconia abutments exhibited a significantly lower fracture resistance than titanium abutments. The mode of failure is specific to the abutment material and design, with the zirconia abutment fracturing before the retentive abutment screw.
SN - 1097-6841
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23684280/Fracture_resistance_of_titanium_and_zirconia_abutments:_an_in_vitro_study_
L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022-3913(13)60306-6
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -
