Citation
Guerra, Jose M., et al. "Effects of Open-irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Design On Lesion Formation and Complications: in Vitro Comparison of 6 Different Devices." Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 24, no. 10, 2013, pp. 1157-62.
Guerra JM, Jorge E, Raga S, et al. Effects of open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter design on lesion formation and complications: in vitro comparison of 6 different devices. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(10):1157-62.
Guerra, J. M., Jorge, E., Raga, S., Gálvez-Montón, C., Alonso-Martín, C., Rodríguez-Font, E., Cinca, J., & Viñolas, X. (2013). Effects of open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter design on lesion formation and complications: in vitro comparison of 6 different devices. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 24(10), 1157-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12175
Guerra JM, et al. Effects of Open-irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Design On Lesion Formation and Complications: in Vitro Comparison of 6 Different Devices. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(10):1157-62. PubMed PMID: 23718822.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter design on lesion formation and complications: in vitro comparison of 6 different devices.
AU - Guerra,Jose M,
AU - Jorge,Esther,
AU - Raga,Silvia,
AU - Gálvez-Montón,Carolina,
AU - Alonso-Martín,Concepción,
AU - Rodríguez-Font,Enrique,
AU - Cinca,Juan,
AU - Viñolas,Xavier,
Y1 - 2013/05/29/
PY - 2013/01/19/received
PY - 2013/04/07/revised
PY - 2013/04/16/accepted
PY - 2013/5/31/entrez
PY - 2013/5/31/pubmed
PY - 2015/7/21/medline
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - catheter ablation
KW - irrigated catheter
KW - lesion size
KW - radiofrequency ablation
SP - 1157
EP - 62
JF - Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
JO - J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
VL - 24
IS - 10
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheters with slight differences in tip architecture are widely used, although limited comparative data are available. The purpose of this study was to compare the lesion size and potential complications produced by commercially available open-irrigated catheters in an in vitro porcine heart model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six catheters were tested (Biosense Webster Thermocool, Boston Scientific Open irrigated, St. Jude CoolPath, St. Jude CoolPath Duo, Biosense Webster Thermocool SF, St. Jude Cool Flex) at 20 and 35 W power-control, under 2 different blood flows (0.1 and 0.5 m/s) and at 2 target durations (30 and 60 seconds). A total of 601 lesions were made in 26 in vitro preparations. The tip temperature profile showed significant differences between the catheters (P < 0.001) with the Thermocool SF registering the lowest. Only the surface diameter and the depth at maximum diameter of the lesion were influenced by the design of the ablation electrode. The lesion volume did not show significant differences between catheters for any power, application duration or blood flow condition. Char and pops occurred more often at 35 W with only slight differences between the catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Tip design of the 6 different irrigated catheters does not affect the lesion total volume, although a slight difference in lesion geometry in terms of surface diameter and depth at maximum diameter is present. The catheters show a slight different in vitro safety profile.
SN - 1540-8167
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23718822/Effects_of_open_irrigated_radiofrequency_ablation_catheter_design_on_lesion_formation_and_complications:_in_vitro_comparison_of_6_different_devices_
L2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12175
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -