Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1994 Winter; 6(1):26-45.JC

Abstract

Abstract There are now numerous observations of subtle right hemisphere (RH) contributions to language comprehension. It has been suggested that these contributions reflect coarse semantic coding in the RH. That is, the RH weakly activates large semantic fields-including concepts distantly related to the input word-whereas the left hemisphere (LH) strongly activates small semantic fields-limited to concepts closely related to the input (Beeman, 1993a,b). This makes the RH less effective at interpreting single words, but more sensitive to semantic overlap of multiple words. To test this theory, subjects read target words preceded by either "Summation" primes (three words each weakly related to the target) or Unrelated primes (three unrelated words), and target exposure duration was manipulated so that subjects correctly named about half the target words in each hemifield. In Experiment 1, subjects benefited more from Summation primes when naming target words presented to the left visual field-RH (Ivf-RH) than when naming target words presented to the right visual field-LH (rvf-LH), suggesting a RH advantage in coarse semantic coding. In Experiment 2, with a low proportion of related prime-target trials, subjects benefited more from "Direct" primes (one strong associate flanked by two unrelated words) than from Summation primes for rvf-LH target words, indicating that the LH activates closely related information much more strongly than distantly related information. Subjects benefited equally from both prime types for Ivf-RH target words, indicating that the RH activates closely related information only slightly more strongly, at best, than distantly related information. This suggests that the RH processes words with relatively coarser coding than the LH, a conclusion consistent with a recent suggestion that the RH coarsely codes visual input (Kosslyn, Chabris, Mar-solek, & Koenig, 1992).

Authors+Show Affiliations

Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

23962328

Citation

Beeman, M, et al. "Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 1, 1994, pp. 26-45.
Beeman M, Friedman RB, Grafman J, et al. Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. J Cogn Neurosci. 1994;6(1):26-45.
Beeman, M., Friedman, R. B., Grafman, J., Perez, E., Diamond, S., & Lindsay, M. B. (1994). Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.26
Beeman M, et al. Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere. J Cogn Neurosci. 1994;6(1):26-45. PubMed PMID: 23962328.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. AU - Beeman,M, AU - Friedman,R B, AU - Grafman,J, AU - Perez,E, AU - Diamond,S, AU - Lindsay,M B, PY - 2013/8/22/entrez PY - 1994/1/1/pubmed PY - 1994/1/1/medline SP - 26 EP - 45 JF - Journal of cognitive neuroscience JO - J Cogn Neurosci VL - 6 IS - 1 N2 - Abstract There are now numerous observations of subtle right hemisphere (RH) contributions to language comprehension. It has been suggested that these contributions reflect coarse semantic coding in the RH. That is, the RH weakly activates large semantic fields-including concepts distantly related to the input word-whereas the left hemisphere (LH) strongly activates small semantic fields-limited to concepts closely related to the input (Beeman, 1993a,b). This makes the RH less effective at interpreting single words, but more sensitive to semantic overlap of multiple words. To test this theory, subjects read target words preceded by either "Summation" primes (three words each weakly related to the target) or Unrelated primes (three unrelated words), and target exposure duration was manipulated so that subjects correctly named about half the target words in each hemifield. In Experiment 1, subjects benefited more from Summation primes when naming target words presented to the left visual field-RH (Ivf-RH) than when naming target words presented to the right visual field-LH (rvf-LH), suggesting a RH advantage in coarse semantic coding. In Experiment 2, with a low proportion of related prime-target trials, subjects benefited more from "Direct" primes (one strong associate flanked by two unrelated words) than from Summation primes for rvf-LH target words, indicating that the LH activates closely related information much more strongly than distantly related information. Subjects benefited equally from both prime types for Ivf-RH target words, indicating that the RH activates closely related information only slightly more strongly, at best, than distantly related information. This suggests that the RH processes words with relatively coarser coding than the LH, a conclusion consistent with a recent suggestion that the RH coarsely codes visual input (Kosslyn, Chabris, Mar-solek, & Koenig, 1992). SN - 0898-929X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23962328/Summation_priming_and_coarse_semantic_coding_in_the_right_hemisphere_ L2 - https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.26?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -