Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR.
J Bus Ethics. 2013 Jan; 112(2):283-299.JB

Abstract

Since scholarly interest in corporate social responsibility (CSR) has primarily focused on the synergies between social and economic performance, our understanding of how (and the conditions under which) companies use CSR to produce policy outcomes that work against public welfare has remained comparatively under-developed. In particular, little is known about how corporate decision-makers privately reconcile the conflicts between public and private interests, even though this is likely to be relevant to understanding the limitations of CSR as a means of aligning business activity with the broader public interest. This study addresses this issue using internal tobacco industry documents to explore British-American Tobacco's (BAT) thinking on CSR and its effects on the company's CSR Programme. The article presents a three-stage model of CSR development, based on Sykes and Matza's theory of techniques of neutralization, which links together: how BAT managers made sense of the company's declining political authority in the mid-1990s; how they subsequently justified the use of CSR as a tool of stakeholder management aimed at diffusing the political impact of public health advocates by breaking up political constituencies working towards evidence-based tobacco regulation; and how CSR works ideologically to shape stakeholders' perceptions of the relative merits of competing approaches to tobacco control. Our analysis has three implications for research and practice. First, it underlines the importance of approaching corporate managers' public comments on CSR critically and situating them in their economic, political and historical contexts. Second, it illustrates the importance of focusing on the political aims and effects of CSR. Third, by showing how CSR practices are used to stymie evidence-based government regulation, the article underlines the importance of highlighting and developing matrices to assess the negative social impacts of CSR.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

23997379

Citation

Fooks, Gary, et al. "The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR." Journal of Business Ethics : JBE, vol. 112, no. 2, 2013, pp. 283-299.
Fooks G, Gilmore A, Collin J, et al. The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR. J Bus Ethics. 2013;112(2):283-299.
Fooks, G., Gilmore, A., Collin, J., Holden, C., & Lee, K. (2013). The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics : JBE, 112(2), 283-299.
Fooks G, et al. The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR. J Bus Ethics. 2013;112(2):283-299. PubMed PMID: 23997379.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR. AU - Fooks,Gary, AU - Gilmore,Anna, AU - Collin,Jeff, AU - Holden,Chris, AU - Lee,Kelley, PY - 2013/9/3/entrez PY - 2013/9/3/pubmed PY - 2013/9/3/medline KW - Corporate political activity KW - Corporate social responsibility KW - Political CSR KW - Stakeholder management KW - Techniques of neutralization SP - 283 EP - 299 JF - Journal of business ethics : JBE JO - J Bus Ethics VL - 112 IS - 2 N2 - Since scholarly interest in corporate social responsibility (CSR) has primarily focused on the synergies between social and economic performance, our understanding of how (and the conditions under which) companies use CSR to produce policy outcomes that work against public welfare has remained comparatively under-developed. In particular, little is known about how corporate decision-makers privately reconcile the conflicts between public and private interests, even though this is likely to be relevant to understanding the limitations of CSR as a means of aligning business activity with the broader public interest. This study addresses this issue using internal tobacco industry documents to explore British-American Tobacco's (BAT) thinking on CSR and its effects on the company's CSR Programme. The article presents a three-stage model of CSR development, based on Sykes and Matza's theory of techniques of neutralization, which links together: how BAT managers made sense of the company's declining political authority in the mid-1990s; how they subsequently justified the use of CSR as a tool of stakeholder management aimed at diffusing the political impact of public health advocates by breaking up political constituencies working towards evidence-based tobacco regulation; and how CSR works ideologically to shape stakeholders' perceptions of the relative merits of competing approaches to tobacco control. Our analysis has three implications for research and practice. First, it underlines the importance of approaching corporate managers' public comments on CSR critically and situating them in their economic, political and historical contexts. Second, it illustrates the importance of focusing on the political aims and effects of CSR. Third, by showing how CSR practices are used to stymie evidence-based government regulation, the article underlines the importance of highlighting and developing matrices to assess the negative social impacts of CSR. SN - 0167-4544 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/23997379/The_Limits_of_Corporate_Social_Responsibility:_Techniques_of_Neutralization_Stakeholder_Management_and_Political_CSR_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -