Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Short- and midterm results between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of morbid obesity.
J Obes. 2013; 2013:934653.JO

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is one of the most widely used bariatric procedures today, and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a single-stage procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity is becoming increasingly popular in Europe. The aim of this study was to compare short- and midterm results between LRYGB and LSG.

METHODS

An observational retrospective study from a database of patients undergoing LRYGB and LSG between January 2008 and June 2011. Seventy patients (mean age 39 years) were included. Patients were followed at 6, 12, and 18 months. Operative time, length of stay, weight loss, comorbidity improvement or resolution, postoperative complications, reinterventions and mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-six LRYGB and 34 LSG were included. Mean operative time of LSG was 106 min while LRYGB was 196 min (P < 0.001). Differences in length of stay, early and late complications, and improvement or resolution in comorbidities were not significant (P > 0.05). Eighteen months after surgery, average excess weight loss was 77.6% in LRYGB and 57.1% in LSG (P = 0.003). There was no surgery-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LRYGB and LSG are safe procedures that provide good results in weight loss and resolution of comorbidities at 18 months.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Digestive and Bariatric Surgery, TOURS University Hospital (Hôpital Trousseau), Avenue de la République, Chambray lès Tours, 37170 Tours, France. dr albeladi ksa@yahoo.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24078867

Citation

Albeladi, Bandar, et al. "Short- and Midterm Results Between Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity." Journal of Obesity, vol. 2013, 2013, p. 934653.
Albeladi B, Bourbao-Tournois C, Huten N. Short- and midterm results between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of morbid obesity. J Obes. 2013;2013:934653.
Albeladi, B., Bourbao-Tournois, C., & Huten, N. (2013). Short- and midterm results between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of morbid obesity. Journal of Obesity, 2013, 934653. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/934653
Albeladi B, Bourbao-Tournois C, Huten N. Short- and Midterm Results Between Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity. J Obes. 2013;2013:934653. PubMed PMID: 24078867.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Short- and midterm results between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of morbid obesity. AU - Albeladi,Bandar, AU - Bourbao-Tournois,Céline, AU - Huten,Noel, Y1 - 2013/09/02/ PY - 2013/03/05/received PY - 2013/08/01/accepted PY - 2013/10/1/entrez PY - 2013/10/1/pubmed PY - 2013/12/24/medline SP - 934653 EP - 934653 JF - Journal of obesity JO - J Obes VL - 2013 N2 - BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is one of the most widely used bariatric procedures today, and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a single-stage procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity is becoming increasingly popular in Europe. The aim of this study was to compare short- and midterm results between LRYGB and LSG. METHODS: An observational retrospective study from a database of patients undergoing LRYGB and LSG between January 2008 and June 2011. Seventy patients (mean age 39 years) were included. Patients were followed at 6, 12, and 18 months. Operative time, length of stay, weight loss, comorbidity improvement or resolution, postoperative complications, reinterventions and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-six LRYGB and 34 LSG were included. Mean operative time of LSG was 106 min while LRYGB was 196 min (P < 0.001). Differences in length of stay, early and late complications, and improvement or resolution in comorbidities were not significant (P > 0.05). Eighteen months after surgery, average excess weight loss was 77.6% in LRYGB and 57.1% in LSG (P = 0.003). There was no surgery-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Both LRYGB and LSG are safe procedures that provide good results in weight loss and resolution of comorbidities at 18 months. SN - 2090-0716 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24078867/Short__and_midterm_results_between_laparoscopic_Roux_en_Y_gastric_bypass_and_laparoscopic_sleeve_gastrectomy_for_the_treatment_of_morbid_obesity_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/934653 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -