Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Immunogenicity and safety of Fluzone(®) intradermal and high-dose influenza vaccines in older adults ≥65 years of age: a randomized, controlled, phase II trial.
Vaccine. 2014 May 01; 32(21):2507-17.V

Abstract

We conducted a randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of an investigational intradermal (ID) trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) and a high-dose (HD) intramuscular (IM) TIV in older adults (≥65 years of age). Older adult subjects were immunized with ID vaccine containing either 15μg hemagglutinin (HA)/strain (n=636) or 21μg HA/strain (n=634), with HD IM vaccine containing 60μg HA/strain (n=320), or with standard-dose (SD) IM vaccine (Fluzone(®); 15μg HA/strain; n=319). For comparison, younger adults (18-49 years of age) were immunized with SD IM vaccine. In older adults, post-vaccination geometric mean titers induced by the ID vaccines were superior to those induced by the SD IM vaccine for the A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains and non-inferior for the B strain. Seroconversion rates induced by the ID vaccines were superior to those induced by the SD IM vaccine in older adults for the A/H1N1 and B strains and non-inferior for the A/H3N2 strain. Results did not differ significantly for the two ID vaccine dosages. Post-vaccination geometric mean titers, seroconversion rates, and most seroprotection rates were significantly higher in HD vaccine recipients than in older adult recipients of the SD IM or ID vaccines and, for most measures, were comparable to those of younger adult SD IM vaccine recipients. Injection-site reactions, but not systemic reactions or unsolicited adverse events, were more common with the ID vaccines than with the IM vaccines. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. This study demonstrated that: (1) the ID and HD vaccines were well-tolerated and more immunogenic than the SD IM vaccine in older adults; (2) the HD vaccine was more immunogenic than the ID vaccines in older adults; and (3) the HD vaccine in older adults and the SD IM vaccine in younger adults elicited comparable antibody responses (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no.: NCT00551031).

Authors+Show Affiliations

Sanofi Pasteur, Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA 18372, USA. Electronic address: peter.tsang@SanofiPasteur.com.Division of Infectious Diseases, Allergy and Immunology, Saint Louis University, Edward A. Doisy Research Center, 8th Floor, 1100 S. Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.Coastal Carolina Research Center, 1156 Bowman Rd., Mount Pleasant, SC 29464, USA.Edinger Medical Group, 9900 Talbert Ave., Fountain Valley, CA 92708, USA.Sanofi Pasteur, Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA 18372, USA.Sanofi Pasteur, Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA 18372, USA.Sanofi Pasteur, Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA 18372, USA.Sanofi Pasteur, Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA 18372, USA.

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial, Phase II
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24120672

Citation

Tsang, Peter, et al. "Immunogenicity and Safety of Fluzone(®) Intradermal and High-dose Influenza Vaccines in Older Adults ≥65 Years of Age: a Randomized, Controlled, Phase II Trial." Vaccine, vol. 32, no. 21, 2014, pp. 2507-17.
Tsang P, Gorse GJ, Strout CB, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of Fluzone(®) intradermal and high-dose influenza vaccines in older adults ≥65 years of age: a randomized, controlled, phase II trial. Vaccine. 2014;32(21):2507-17.
Tsang, P., Gorse, G. J., Strout, C. B., Sperling, M., Greenberg, D. P., Ozol-Godfrey, A., DiazGranados, C., & Landolfi, V. (2014). Immunogenicity and safety of Fluzone(®) intradermal and high-dose influenza vaccines in older adults ≥65 years of age: a randomized, controlled, phase II trial. Vaccine, 32(21), 2507-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.074
Tsang P, et al. Immunogenicity and Safety of Fluzone(®) Intradermal and High-dose Influenza Vaccines in Older Adults ≥65 Years of Age: a Randomized, Controlled, Phase II Trial. Vaccine. 2014 May 1;32(21):2507-17. PubMed PMID: 24120672.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Immunogenicity and safety of Fluzone(®) intradermal and high-dose influenza vaccines in older adults ≥65 years of age: a randomized, controlled, phase II trial. AU - Tsang,Peter, AU - Gorse,Geoffrey J, AU - Strout,Cynthia B, AU - Sperling,Malcolm, AU - Greenberg,David P, AU - Ozol-Godfrey,Ayca, AU - DiazGranados,Carlos, AU - Landolfi,Victoria, Y1 - 2013/10/11/ PY - 2013/04/26/received PY - 2013/08/19/revised PY - 2013/09/30/accepted PY - 2013/10/15/entrez PY - 2013/10/15/pubmed PY - 2014/10/31/medline KW - Antibodies KW - High-dose vaccine KW - Intradermal KW - Older adults KW - Safety KW - Trivalent influenza vaccine SP - 2507 EP - 17 JF - Vaccine JO - Vaccine VL - 32 IS - 21 N2 - We conducted a randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of an investigational intradermal (ID) trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) and a high-dose (HD) intramuscular (IM) TIV in older adults (≥65 years of age). Older adult subjects were immunized with ID vaccine containing either 15μg hemagglutinin (HA)/strain (n=636) or 21μg HA/strain (n=634), with HD IM vaccine containing 60μg HA/strain (n=320), or with standard-dose (SD) IM vaccine (Fluzone(®); 15μg HA/strain; n=319). For comparison, younger adults (18-49 years of age) were immunized with SD IM vaccine. In older adults, post-vaccination geometric mean titers induced by the ID vaccines were superior to those induced by the SD IM vaccine for the A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains and non-inferior for the B strain. Seroconversion rates induced by the ID vaccines were superior to those induced by the SD IM vaccine in older adults for the A/H1N1 and B strains and non-inferior for the A/H3N2 strain. Results did not differ significantly for the two ID vaccine dosages. Post-vaccination geometric mean titers, seroconversion rates, and most seroprotection rates were significantly higher in HD vaccine recipients than in older adult recipients of the SD IM or ID vaccines and, for most measures, were comparable to those of younger adult SD IM vaccine recipients. Injection-site reactions, but not systemic reactions or unsolicited adverse events, were more common with the ID vaccines than with the IM vaccines. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. This study demonstrated that: (1) the ID and HD vaccines were well-tolerated and more immunogenic than the SD IM vaccine in older adults; (2) the HD vaccine was more immunogenic than the ID vaccines in older adults; and (3) the HD vaccine in older adults and the SD IM vaccine in younger adults elicited comparable antibody responses (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no.: NCT00551031). SN - 1873-2518 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24120672/Immunogenicity_and_safety_of_Fluzone_®__intradermal_and_high_dose_influenza_vaccines_in_older_adults_≥65_years_of_age:_a_randomized_controlled_phase_II_trial_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264-410X(13)01358-3 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -