Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Misreporting of energy intake in the 2007 Australian Children's Survey: differences in the reporting of food types between plausible, under- and over-reporters of energy intake.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Oct; 27(5):450-8.JH

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Misreporting is common when collecting dietary intake data, although relatively little is known about the types of foods misreported among children. The present study aimed to identify differences in the reporting of food types between plausible and misreporters of energy intake in a national nutrition survey of Australian children.

METHODS

Dietary data were collected using a 24-h recall from 4826 children aged 2-16 years who were participating in the 2007 Australian National Children's Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. Misreporters of energy intake were classified using the Goldberg criteria. Differences in the reporting of a range of food types were examined between plausible, under- and over-reporters.

RESULTS

Compared with plausible reporters, under-reporters reported less frequent consumption and smaller quantities of consumption of both core and noncore foods. Older children (self-report) under-reported a larger selection of noncore foods than younger children (parental report). Over-reporters reported similar percentages of consumption of many core and noncore foods, with some exceptions. The quantities consumed by over-reporters were generally much larger and this was evident in younger and older children. Compared with plausible reporters, under-reporters had significantly higher intakes of protein and starch but lower intakes of sugar and fat, as percentage energy, than plausible reporters, whereas over-reporters had higher fat and lower carbohydrate intakes.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in the reporting of food types were common between plausible, under- and over-reporters of energy intake by children (or their parents) and were not restricted to noncore foods.

Authors+Show Affiliations

School of Molecular Bioscience, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24206056

Citation

Rangan, A, et al. "Misreporting of Energy Intake in the 2007 Australian Children's Survey: Differences in the Reporting of Food Types Between Plausible, Under- and Over-reporters of Energy Intake." Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics : the Official Journal of the British Dietetic Association, vol. 27, no. 5, 2014, pp. 450-8.
Rangan A, Allman-Farinelli M, Donohoe E, et al. Misreporting of energy intake in the 2007 Australian Children's Survey: differences in the reporting of food types between plausible, under- and over-reporters of energy intake. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014;27(5):450-8.
Rangan, A., Allman-Farinelli, M., Donohoe, E., & Gill, T. (2014). Misreporting of energy intake in the 2007 Australian Children's Survey: differences in the reporting of food types between plausible, under- and over-reporters of energy intake. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics : the Official Journal of the British Dietetic Association, 27(5), 450-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12182
Rangan A, et al. Misreporting of Energy Intake in the 2007 Australian Children's Survey: Differences in the Reporting of Food Types Between Plausible, Under- and Over-reporters of Energy Intake. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014;27(5):450-8. PubMed PMID: 24206056.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Misreporting of energy intake in the 2007 Australian Children's Survey: differences in the reporting of food types between plausible, under- and over-reporters of energy intake. AU - Rangan,A, AU - Allman-Farinelli,M, AU - Donohoe,E, AU - Gill,T, Y1 - 2013/11/08/ PY - 2013/11/12/entrez PY - 2013/11/12/pubmed PY - 2015/5/23/medline KW - Australia KW - children KW - dietary survey KW - foods KW - misreporting SP - 450 EP - 8 JF - Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association JO - J Hum Nutr Diet VL - 27 IS - 5 N2 - BACKGROUND: Misreporting is common when collecting dietary intake data, although relatively little is known about the types of foods misreported among children. The present study aimed to identify differences in the reporting of food types between plausible and misreporters of energy intake in a national nutrition survey of Australian children. METHODS: Dietary data were collected using a 24-h recall from 4826 children aged 2-16 years who were participating in the 2007 Australian National Children's Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. Misreporters of energy intake were classified using the Goldberg criteria. Differences in the reporting of a range of food types were examined between plausible, under- and over-reporters. RESULTS: Compared with plausible reporters, under-reporters reported less frequent consumption and smaller quantities of consumption of both core and noncore foods. Older children (self-report) under-reported a larger selection of noncore foods than younger children (parental report). Over-reporters reported similar percentages of consumption of many core and noncore foods, with some exceptions. The quantities consumed by over-reporters were generally much larger and this was evident in younger and older children. Compared with plausible reporters, under-reporters had significantly higher intakes of protein and starch but lower intakes of sugar and fat, as percentage energy, than plausible reporters, whereas over-reporters had higher fat and lower carbohydrate intakes. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the reporting of food types were common between plausible, under- and over-reporters of energy intake by children (or their parents) and were not restricted to noncore foods. SN - 1365-277X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24206056/Misreporting_of_energy_intake_in_the_2007_Australian_Children's_Survey:_differences_in_the_reporting_of_food_types_between_plausible_under__and_over_reporters_of_energy_intake_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12182 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -