Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Antimicrobial resistance among blood culture isolates of Salmonella enterica in New Delhi.
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013 Nov 15; 7(11):788-95.JI

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Enteric fever is a global public health problem, especially in developing countries. Antimicrobial resistance is a major issue enteric fever management. This study examined current pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility among Salmonella enterica isolates from enteric fever cases at a tertiary care centre in New Delhi, India.

METHODOLOGY

Blood cultures from patients with enteric fever during January 2010- July 2012 were processed using the BACTEC automated system. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using Kirby Bauer's disc diffusion method and/or Phoenix 100 automated system.

RESULTS

Of 344 isolates of Salmonella enterica, 266 (77.3%) were S. Typhi, 77 (22.4%) were S. Paratyphi A, and one (0.3%) was S. Paratyphi B. Resistance to nalidixic acid (NA(R)) (96.7%) was most common, followed by ciprofloxacin (37.9%), and azithromycin (7.3%). Multi-drug resistance was observed only in S. Typhi (3.4%). Among NA(R) strains, 61.8% were sensitive, 11.1% were moderately sensitive, and 23.9% were resistant to ciprofloxacin (0.8%, 57.4%, and 37.9% respectively according to revised CLSI breakpoint criteria for ciprofloxacin). Resistance to third-generation cephalosporin was found in seven (2%) strains of S. enterica.

CONCLUSION

Increasing rates of nalidixic acid, fluoroquinolone and azithromycin resistance among S. enterica, particularly in S. Paratyphi A strains, is of concern, as S. Paratyphi A infection is becoming increasingly common and is not prevented by current vaccinations. Our results favour use of cefexime or possibly chloramphenicol as first choice for uncomplicated enteric fever. MICs for third-generation cephalosporins and susceptibility pattern must be closely monitored in view of its emerging resistance among Salmonella enterica.

Authors+Show Affiliations

BLK Superspeciality Hospital, Pusa Road, New Delhi, India. drsarika6@gmail.com.No affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24240035

Citation

Jain, Sarika, and Tulsi Das Chugh. "Antimicrobial Resistance Among Blood Culture Isolates of Salmonella Enterica in New Delhi." Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, vol. 7, no. 11, 2013, pp. 788-95.
Jain S, Das Chugh T. Antimicrobial resistance among blood culture isolates of Salmonella enterica in New Delhi. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7(11):788-95.
Jain, S., & Das Chugh, T. (2013). Antimicrobial resistance among blood culture isolates of Salmonella enterica in New Delhi. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 7(11), 788-95. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.3030
Jain S, Das Chugh T. Antimicrobial Resistance Among Blood Culture Isolates of Salmonella Enterica in New Delhi. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013 Nov 15;7(11):788-95. PubMed PMID: 24240035.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Antimicrobial resistance among blood culture isolates of Salmonella enterica in New Delhi. AU - Jain,Sarika, AU - Das Chugh,Tulsi, Y1 - 2013/11/15/ PY - 2012/09/23/received PY - 2013/02/06/accepted PY - 2013/09/20/revised PY - 2013/11/19/entrez PY - 2013/11/19/pubmed PY - 2014/7/8/medline SP - 788 EP - 95 JF - Journal of infection in developing countries JO - J Infect Dev Ctries VL - 7 IS - 11 N2 - INTRODUCTION: Enteric fever is a global public health problem, especially in developing countries. Antimicrobial resistance is a major issue enteric fever management. This study examined current pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility among Salmonella enterica isolates from enteric fever cases at a tertiary care centre in New Delhi, India. METHODOLOGY: Blood cultures from patients with enteric fever during January 2010- July 2012 were processed using the BACTEC automated system. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using Kirby Bauer's disc diffusion method and/or Phoenix 100 automated system. RESULTS: Of 344 isolates of Salmonella enterica, 266 (77.3%) were S. Typhi, 77 (22.4%) were S. Paratyphi A, and one (0.3%) was S. Paratyphi B. Resistance to nalidixic acid (NA(R)) (96.7%) was most common, followed by ciprofloxacin (37.9%), and azithromycin (7.3%). Multi-drug resistance was observed only in S. Typhi (3.4%). Among NA(R) strains, 61.8% were sensitive, 11.1% were moderately sensitive, and 23.9% were resistant to ciprofloxacin (0.8%, 57.4%, and 37.9% respectively according to revised CLSI breakpoint criteria for ciprofloxacin). Resistance to third-generation cephalosporin was found in seven (2%) strains of S. enterica. CONCLUSION: Increasing rates of nalidixic acid, fluoroquinolone and azithromycin resistance among S. enterica, particularly in S. Paratyphi A strains, is of concern, as S. Paratyphi A infection is becoming increasingly common and is not prevented by current vaccinations. Our results favour use of cefexime or possibly chloramphenicol as first choice for uncomplicated enteric fever. MICs for third-generation cephalosporins and susceptibility pattern must be closely monitored in view of its emerging resistance among Salmonella enterica. SN - 1972-2680 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24240035/Antimicrobial_resistance_among_blood_culture_isolates_of_Salmonella_enterica_in_New_Delhi_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -