Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Applying different equations to evaluate the level of mismatch between students and school furniture.
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jul; 45(4):1123-32.AE

Abstract

The mismatch between students and school furniture is likely to result in a number of negative effects, such as uncomfortable body posture, pain, and ultimately, it may also affect the learning process. This study's main aim is to review the literature describing the criteria equations for defining the mismatch between students and school furniture, to apply these equations to a specific sample and, based on the results, to propose a methodology to evaluate school furniture suitability. The literature review comprises one publications database, which was used to identify the studies carried out in the field of the abovementioned mismatch. The sample used for testing the different equations was composed of 2261 volunteer subjects from 14 schools. Fifteen studies were found to meet the criteria of this review and 21 equations to test 6 furniture dimensions were identified. Regarding seat height, there are considerable differences between the two most frequently used equations. Although seat to desk clearance was evaluated by knee height, this condition seems to be based on the false assumption that students are sitting on a chair with a proper seat height. Finally, the proposed methodology for suitability evaluation of school furniture should allow for a more reliable analysis of school furniture.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile. Electronic address: hector.castellucci@uv.cl.Research Centre on Industrial and Technology Management, School of Engineering, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering Section Applied Ergonomics and Design, Landbergstraat,15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24560414

Citation

Castellucci, H I., et al. "Applying Different Equations to Evaluate the Level of Mismatch Between Students and School Furniture." Applied Ergonomics, vol. 45, no. 4, 2014, pp. 1123-32.
Castellucci HI, Arezes PM, Molenbroek JF. Applying different equations to evaluate the level of mismatch between students and school furniture. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(4):1123-32.
Castellucci, H. I., Arezes, P. M., & Molenbroek, J. F. (2014). Applying different equations to evaluate the level of mismatch between students and school furniture. Applied Ergonomics, 45(4), 1123-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.01.012
Castellucci HI, Arezes PM, Molenbroek JF. Applying Different Equations to Evaluate the Level of Mismatch Between Students and School Furniture. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(4):1123-32. PubMed PMID: 24560414.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Applying different equations to evaluate the level of mismatch between students and school furniture. AU - Castellucci,H I, AU - Arezes,P M, AU - Molenbroek,J F M, Y1 - 2014/02/18/ PY - 2013/08/14/received PY - 2013/11/23/revised PY - 2014/01/27/accepted PY - 2014/2/25/entrez PY - 2014/2/25/pubmed PY - 2014/12/20/medline KW - Furniture KW - Mismatch KW - School SP - 1123 EP - 32 JF - Applied ergonomics JO - Appl Ergon VL - 45 IS - 4 N2 - The mismatch between students and school furniture is likely to result in a number of negative effects, such as uncomfortable body posture, pain, and ultimately, it may also affect the learning process. This study's main aim is to review the literature describing the criteria equations for defining the mismatch between students and school furniture, to apply these equations to a specific sample and, based on the results, to propose a methodology to evaluate school furniture suitability. The literature review comprises one publications database, which was used to identify the studies carried out in the field of the abovementioned mismatch. The sample used for testing the different equations was composed of 2261 volunteer subjects from 14 schools. Fifteen studies were found to meet the criteria of this review and 21 equations to test 6 furniture dimensions were identified. Regarding seat height, there are considerable differences between the two most frequently used equations. Although seat to desk clearance was evaluated by knee height, this condition seems to be based on the false assumption that students are sitting on a chair with a proper seat height. Finally, the proposed methodology for suitability evaluation of school furniture should allow for a more reliable analysis of school furniture. SN - 1872-9126 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24560414/Applying_different_equations_to_evaluate_the_level_of_mismatch_between_students_and_school_furniture_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -