Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison Between the Effects of Combining Elastic and Free-Weight Resistance and Free-Weight Resistance on Force and Power Production.
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Oct; 30(10):2713-22.JS

Abstract

Paditsaeree, K, Intiraporn, C, and Lawsirirat, C. Comparison between the effects of combining elastic and free-weight resistance and free-weight resistance on force and power production. J Strength Cond Res 30(10): 2713-2722, 2016-Elastic tubing attached to a barbell has been reported to enhance strength and power to a greater extent as compared with conventional barbells. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the additional elastic tubing to a barbell during a clean pull on peak power (PP), peak velocity (PV), and peak force (PF). Six competitive female weightlifters (mean age, 16.7 ± 2.1 years) performed 3 sets of 3 repetitions of the clean pull at 90% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Testing was conducted on 3 separate days: day 1 without elastic tubing (no tubing [NT]) and the other 2 days with 2 elastic tubing loading conditions (T10 and T20), in random order. No tubing represents a condition where all resistance was acquired from the barbell (90% of 1RM). T10 and T20 represent conditions of combining elastic tubing at 10 and 20% of the subjects' 90% 1RM with a barbell (90% of 1RM). One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess loading conditions on PP, PV, and PF. The results showed that there was a significant increase in all variables-PP, PF, and PV-between T10 and NT and between T20 and NT (p ≤ 0.05). The results revealed that adding a 10% increment to 90% of 1RM seems to be the optimal training condition for increasing power, force, and velocity during the clean pull.

Links

Publisher Full Text (DOI)

Authors+Show Affiliations

Paditsaeree K
Faculty of Sports Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Intiraporn C
No affiliation info available
Lawsirirat C
No affiliation info available

MeSH

AdolescentFemaleHumansMuscle StrengthRandom AllocationResistance TrainingWeight Lifting

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24662231

Citation

Paditsaeree, Kampanart, et al. "Comparison Between the Effects of Combining Elastic and Free-Weight Resistance and Free-Weight Resistance On Force and Power Production." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 30, no. 10, 2016, pp. 2713-22.
Paditsaeree K, Intiraporn C, Lawsirirat C. Comparison Between the Effects of Combining Elastic and Free-Weight Resistance and Free-Weight Resistance on Force and Power Production. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(10):2713-22.
Paditsaeree, K., Intiraporn, C., & Lawsirirat, C. (2016). Comparison Between the Effects of Combining Elastic and Free-Weight Resistance and Free-Weight Resistance on Force and Power Production. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(10), 2713-22. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000459
Paditsaeree K, Intiraporn C, Lawsirirat C. Comparison Between the Effects of Combining Elastic and Free-Weight Resistance and Free-Weight Resistance On Force and Power Production. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(10):2713-22. PubMed PMID: 24662231.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison Between the Effects of Combining Elastic and Free-Weight Resistance and Free-Weight Resistance on Force and Power Production. AU - Paditsaeree,Kampanart, AU - Intiraporn,Chaninchai, AU - Lawsirirat,Chaipat, PY - 2014/3/26/entrez PY - 2014/3/26/pubmed PY - 2016/12/23/medline SP - 2713 EP - 22 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 30 IS - 10 N2 - Paditsaeree, K, Intiraporn, C, and Lawsirirat, C. Comparison between the effects of combining elastic and free-weight resistance and free-weight resistance on force and power production. J Strength Cond Res 30(10): 2713-2722, 2016-Elastic tubing attached to a barbell has been reported to enhance strength and power to a greater extent as compared with conventional barbells. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the additional elastic tubing to a barbell during a clean pull on peak power (PP), peak velocity (PV), and peak force (PF). Six competitive female weightlifters (mean age, 16.7 ± 2.1 years) performed 3 sets of 3 repetitions of the clean pull at 90% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Testing was conducted on 3 separate days: day 1 without elastic tubing (no tubing [NT]) and the other 2 days with 2 elastic tubing loading conditions (T10 and T20), in random order. No tubing represents a condition where all resistance was acquired from the barbell (90% of 1RM). T10 and T20 represent conditions of combining elastic tubing at 10 and 20% of the subjects' 90% 1RM with a barbell (90% of 1RM). One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess loading conditions on PP, PV, and PF. The results showed that there was a significant increase in all variables-PP, PF, and PV-between T10 and NT and between T20 and NT (p ≤ 0.05). The results revealed that adding a 10% increment to 90% of 1RM seems to be the optimal training condition for increasing power, force, and velocity during the clean pull. SN - 1533-4287 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24662231/Comparison_Between_the_Effects_of_Combining_Elastic_and_Free_Weight_Resistance_and_Free_Weight_Resistance_on_Force_and_Power_Production_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -