Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Integration of substance use disorder services with primary care: health center surveys and qualitative interviews.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014 Mar 28; 9:15.SA

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Each year, nearly 20 million Americans with alcohol or illicit drug dependence do not receive treatment. The Affordable Care Act and parity laws are expected to result in increased access to treatment through integration of substance use disorder (SUD) services with primary care. However, relatively little research exists on the integration of SUD services into primary care settings. Our goal was to assess SUD service integration in California primary care settings and to identify the practice and policy facilitators and barriers encountered by providers who have attempted to integrate these services.

METHODS

Primary survey and qualitative interview data were collected from the population of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in five California counties known to be engaged in SUD integration efforts was surveyed. From among the organizations that responded to the survey (78% response rate), four were purposively sampled based on their level of integration. Interviews were conducted with management, staff, and patients (n=18) from these organizations to collect further qualitative information on the barriers and facilitators of integration.

RESULTS

Compared to mental health services, there was a trend for SUD services to be less integrated with primary care, and SUD services were rated significantly less effective. The perceived difference in effectiveness appeared to be due to provider training. Policy suggestions included expanding the SUD workforce that can bill Medicaid, allowing same-day billing of two services, facilitating easier reimbursement for medications, developing the workforce, and increasing community SUD specialty care capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to integrate SUD services with primary care face significant barriers, many of which arise at the policy level and are addressable.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Los Angeles Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, 11075 Santa Monica Blvd Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA. durada@ucla.edu.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24679108

Citation

Urada, Darren, et al. "Integration of Substance Use Disorder Services With Primary Care: Health Center Surveys and Qualitative Interviews." Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, vol. 9, 2014, p. 15.
Urada D, Teruya C, Gelberg L, et al. Integration of substance use disorder services with primary care: health center surveys and qualitative interviews. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014;9:15.
Urada, D., Teruya, C., Gelberg, L., & Rawson, R. (2014). Integration of substance use disorder services with primary care: health center surveys and qualitative interviews. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 9, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-9-15
Urada D, et al. Integration of Substance Use Disorder Services With Primary Care: Health Center Surveys and Qualitative Interviews. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014 Mar 28;9:15. PubMed PMID: 24679108.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Integration of substance use disorder services with primary care: health center surveys and qualitative interviews. AU - Urada,Darren, AU - Teruya,Cheryl, AU - Gelberg,Lillian, AU - Rawson,Richard, Y1 - 2014/03/28/ PY - 2013/10/31/received PY - 2014/02/21/accepted PY - 2014/4/1/entrez PY - 2014/4/1/pubmed PY - 2015/1/13/medline SP - 15 EP - 15 JF - Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy JO - Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy VL - 9 N2 - BACKGROUND: Each year, nearly 20 million Americans with alcohol or illicit drug dependence do not receive treatment. The Affordable Care Act and parity laws are expected to result in increased access to treatment through integration of substance use disorder (SUD) services with primary care. However, relatively little research exists on the integration of SUD services into primary care settings. Our goal was to assess SUD service integration in California primary care settings and to identify the practice and policy facilitators and barriers encountered by providers who have attempted to integrate these services. METHODS: Primary survey and qualitative interview data were collected from the population of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in five California counties known to be engaged in SUD integration efforts was surveyed. From among the organizations that responded to the survey (78% response rate), four were purposively sampled based on their level of integration. Interviews were conducted with management, staff, and patients (n=18) from these organizations to collect further qualitative information on the barriers and facilitators of integration. RESULTS: Compared to mental health services, there was a trend for SUD services to be less integrated with primary care, and SUD services were rated significantly less effective. The perceived difference in effectiveness appeared to be due to provider training. Policy suggestions included expanding the SUD workforce that can bill Medicaid, allowing same-day billing of two services, facilitating easier reimbursement for medications, developing the workforce, and increasing community SUD specialty care capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to integrate SUD services with primary care face significant barriers, many of which arise at the policy level and are addressable. SN - 1747-597X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24679108/Integration_of_substance_use_disorder_services_with_primary_care:_health_center_surveys_and_qualitative_interviews_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -