Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Sep; 11(9):899-904.JA

Abstract

RADPEER is a product developed by the ACR that aims to assist radiologists with quality assessment and improvement through peer review. The program opened in 2002, was initially offered to physician groups in 2003, developed an electronic version in 2005 (eRADPEER), revised the scoring system in 2009, and first surveyed the RADPEER membership in 2010. In 2012, a survey was sent to 16,000 ACR member radiologists, both users and nonusers of RADPEER, with the goal of understanding how to make RADPEER more relevant to its members. A total of 31 questions were used, some of which were repeated from the 2010 survey. The ACR's RADPEER committee has published 3 papers on the program since its inception. In this report, the authors summarize the survey results and suggest future opportunities for making RADPEER more useful to its membership.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: habujudeh@partners.org.Chambersburg Imaging Associates, Chambersburg, Pennsylvania.Penn State Milton Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.Penn State Milton Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.Indiana Regional Imaging, Indiana, Pennsylvania.University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.Hennepin Health System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Abington Health, Lansdale Hospital, Lansdale, Pennsylvania.University of California San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, California.Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24842585

Citation

Abujudeh, Hani, et al. "RADPEER Peer Review: Relevance, Use, Concerns, Challenges, and Direction Forward." Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, vol. 11, no. 9, 2014, pp. 899-904.
Abujudeh H, Pyatt RS, Bruno MA, et al. RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(9):899-904.
Abujudeh, H., Pyatt, R. S., Bruno, M. A., Chetlen, A. L., Buck, D., Hobbs, S. K., Roth, C., Truwit, C., Agarwal, R., Kennedy, S. T., & Glenn, L. (2014). RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 11(9), 899-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.004
Abujudeh H, et al. RADPEER Peer Review: Relevance, Use, Concerns, Challenges, and Direction Forward. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(9):899-904. PubMed PMID: 24842585.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward. AU - Abujudeh,Hani, AU - Pyatt,Robert S,Jr AU - Bruno,Michael A, AU - Chetlen,Alison L, AU - Buck,David, AU - Hobbs,Susan K, AU - Roth,Christopher, AU - Truwit,Charles, AU - Agarwal,Rajan, AU - Kennedy,Scott T O, AU - Glenn,Lucille, Y1 - 2014/05/16/ PY - 2013/12/17/received PY - 2014/02/10/accepted PY - 2014/5/21/entrez PY - 2014/5/21/pubmed PY - 2015/5/15/medline KW - OPPE KW - PQI KW - RADPEER KW - peer review KW - quality and safety SP - 899 EP - 904 JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR JO - J Am Coll Radiol VL - 11 IS - 9 N2 - RADPEER is a product developed by the ACR that aims to assist radiologists with quality assessment and improvement through peer review. The program opened in 2002, was initially offered to physician groups in 2003, developed an electronic version in 2005 (eRADPEER), revised the scoring system in 2009, and first surveyed the RADPEER membership in 2010. In 2012, a survey was sent to 16,000 ACR member radiologists, both users and nonusers of RADPEER, with the goal of understanding how to make RADPEER more relevant to its members. A total of 31 questions were used, some of which were repeated from the 2010 survey. The ACR's RADPEER committee has published 3 papers on the program since its inception. In this report, the authors summarize the survey results and suggest future opportunities for making RADPEER more useful to its membership. SN - 1558-349X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24842585/RADPEER_peer_review:_relevance_use_concerns_challenges_and_direction_forward_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1546-1440(14)00062-3 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -