Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of acute countermovement jump responses after functional isometric and dynamic half squats.
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Dec; 28(12):3363-74.JS

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare acute countermovement jump (CMJ) responses after functional isometric (FI) and dynamic half (DH) squats. Ten strength-trained males (relative full back squat 1 repetition maximum [1RM]: 1.9 ± 0.2) participated in a randomized crossover design study. On 2 separate days, participants performed baseline CMJs followed by either FI or DH squats loaded with 150% of full back squat 1RM. Further CMJs were performed between 2 and 11 minutes after FI or DH squats. Kinematic and kinetic CMJ variables were measured. There were no differences observed between conditions when peak CMJ variables after FI or DH squats were compared with baseline values (p > 0.05). Countermovement jump time effects (p ≤ 0.05) were observed after squats. Increases in peak force (p ≤ 0.05; FI: 3.9%, range: -0.9 to 9.1%; DH: 4.2%, range: 0.0-11.5%) and decreases in peak power (p ≤ 0.05; FI: -0.4%, range: -5.1 to 4.0%; DH: -1.1%, range: -6.6 to 2.9%) occurred for combined condition data. Positive correlations between lower-body strength and the extent or timing of acute CMJ responses were not detected (p > 0.05). Because of the apparent lack of additive acute CMJ responses, the use of conventional DH squat protocols should be considered rather than FI squats in precompetition and training situations. Furthermore, the establishment of individual FI and DH squat protocols also seems to be necessary, rather than relying on relative lower-body strength to predict the nature of acute CMJ responses.

Authors+Show Affiliations

1The Moray House School of Education, Institute for Sport, Physical Education, and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; 2SportScotland Institute of Sport, Stirling, United Kingdom; 3School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom; and 4Health and Exercise Sciences Research Group, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24918298

Citation

Boyd, David A., et al. "Comparison of Acute Countermovement Jump Responses After Functional Isometric and Dynamic Half Squats." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 28, no. 12, 2014, pp. 3363-74.
Boyd DA, Donald N, Balshaw TG. Comparison of acute countermovement jump responses after functional isometric and dynamic half squats. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(12):3363-74.
Boyd, D. A., Donald, N., & Balshaw, T. G. (2014). Comparison of acute countermovement jump responses after functional isometric and dynamic half squats. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(12), 3363-74. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000559
Boyd DA, Donald N, Balshaw TG. Comparison of Acute Countermovement Jump Responses After Functional Isometric and Dynamic Half Squats. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(12):3363-74. PubMed PMID: 24918298.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of acute countermovement jump responses after functional isometric and dynamic half squats. AU - Boyd,David A, AU - Donald,Neil, AU - Balshaw,Thomas G, PY - 2014/6/12/entrez PY - 2014/6/12/pubmed PY - 2015/12/15/medline SP - 3363 EP - 74 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 28 IS - 12 N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare acute countermovement jump (CMJ) responses after functional isometric (FI) and dynamic half (DH) squats. Ten strength-trained males (relative full back squat 1 repetition maximum [1RM]: 1.9 ± 0.2) participated in a randomized crossover design study. On 2 separate days, participants performed baseline CMJs followed by either FI or DH squats loaded with 150% of full back squat 1RM. Further CMJs were performed between 2 and 11 minutes after FI or DH squats. Kinematic and kinetic CMJ variables were measured. There were no differences observed between conditions when peak CMJ variables after FI or DH squats were compared with baseline values (p > 0.05). Countermovement jump time effects (p ≤ 0.05) were observed after squats. Increases in peak force (p ≤ 0.05; FI: 3.9%, range: -0.9 to 9.1%; DH: 4.2%, range: 0.0-11.5%) and decreases in peak power (p ≤ 0.05; FI: -0.4%, range: -5.1 to 4.0%; DH: -1.1%, range: -6.6 to 2.9%) occurred for combined condition data. Positive correlations between lower-body strength and the extent or timing of acute CMJ responses were not detected (p > 0.05). Because of the apparent lack of additive acute CMJ responses, the use of conventional DH squat protocols should be considered rather than FI squats in precompetition and training situations. Furthermore, the establishment of individual FI and DH squat protocols also seems to be necessary, rather than relying on relative lower-body strength to predict the nature of acute CMJ responses. SN - 1533-4287 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24918298/Comparison_of_acute_countermovement_jump_responses_after_functional_isometric_and_dynamic_half_squats_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -