Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The Goals of Patient Care project: implementing a proactive approach to patient-centred decision-making.
Intern Med J. 2014 Oct; 44(10):961-6.IM

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients in the later stages of their lives risk being harmed by futile or unwanted interventions if realistic care goals and patient values are not recognised. Doctors have difficulty discussing and informing patients' healthcare goals.

AIMS

To review implementation of a Goals of Patient Care (GOPC) summary in medical inpatients and its applicability in emergency medical response (EMR) situations.

METHODS

Single-centre cross-sectional study of adult medical inpatients and adult inpatients requiring EMR at a Victorian general hospital.

MEASURES

presence and content of GOPC summary, secondary review of decision-making and discussion documentation, patient characteristics; EMR precipitants and outcomes.

RESULTS

GOPC were documented for 82 of 101 patients. One had an existing advance directive, and six had records of a patient-appointed substitute decision-maker. For patients with GOPC, 80 had life-prolonging treatment aims, with a varying degree of treatment limitation in 48. Discussion with patient or substitute decision-maker was evident in 43 cases. GOPC were documented prior to nine of 23 EMR. The EMR triggered a GOPC modification in three instances.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of a routine GOPC summary encourages consideration of goals of care for most medical inpatients. Few have pre-existing records of their wishes, and there are opportunities for improvement in this regard. Doctors may still have difficulty determining goals of care, and discussion of GOPC with patients and families may not be clearly documented. Most patients requiring EMR do not have prior GOPC review, and the role of the summary in these situations remains unclear.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Observational Study

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24942613

Citation

Brimblecombe, C, et al. "The Goals of Patient Care Project: Implementing a Proactive Approach to Patient-centred Decision-making." Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 44, no. 10, 2014, pp. 961-6.
Brimblecombe C, Crosbie D, Lim WK, et al. The Goals of Patient Care project: implementing a proactive approach to patient-centred decision-making. Intern Med J. 2014;44(10):961-6.
Brimblecombe, C., Crosbie, D., Lim, W. K., & Hayes, B. (2014). The Goals of Patient Care project: implementing a proactive approach to patient-centred decision-making. Internal Medicine Journal, 44(10), 961-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12511
Brimblecombe C, et al. The Goals of Patient Care Project: Implementing a Proactive Approach to Patient-centred Decision-making. Intern Med J. 2014;44(10):961-6. PubMed PMID: 24942613.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The Goals of Patient Care project: implementing a proactive approach to patient-centred decision-making. AU - Brimblecombe,C, AU - Crosbie,D, AU - Lim,W K, AU - Hayes,B, PY - 2014/04/10/received PY - 2014/06/11/accepted PY - 2014/6/20/entrez PY - 2014/6/20/pubmed PY - 2015/7/15/medline KW - advance care planning KW - communication KW - decision-making KW - futility KW - resuscitation orders SP - 961 EP - 6 JF - Internal medicine journal JO - Intern Med J VL - 44 IS - 10 N2 - BACKGROUND: Patients in the later stages of their lives risk being harmed by futile or unwanted interventions if realistic care goals and patient values are not recognised. Doctors have difficulty discussing and informing patients' healthcare goals. AIMS: To review implementation of a Goals of Patient Care (GOPC) summary in medical inpatients and its applicability in emergency medical response (EMR) situations. METHODS: Single-centre cross-sectional study of adult medical inpatients and adult inpatients requiring EMR at a Victorian general hospital. MEASURES: presence and content of GOPC summary, secondary review of decision-making and discussion documentation, patient characteristics; EMR precipitants and outcomes. RESULTS: GOPC were documented for 82 of 101 patients. One had an existing advance directive, and six had records of a patient-appointed substitute decision-maker. For patients with GOPC, 80 had life-prolonging treatment aims, with a varying degree of treatment limitation in 48. Discussion with patient or substitute decision-maker was evident in 43 cases. GOPC were documented prior to nine of 23 EMR. The EMR triggered a GOPC modification in three instances. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of a routine GOPC summary encourages consideration of goals of care for most medical inpatients. Few have pre-existing records of their wishes, and there are opportunities for improvement in this regard. Doctors may still have difficulty determining goals of care, and discussion of GOPC with patients and families may not be clearly documented. Most patients requiring EMR do not have prior GOPC review, and the role of the summary in these situations remains unclear. SN - 1445-5994 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24942613/The_Goals_of_Patient_Care_project:_implementing_a_proactive_approach_to_patient_centred_decision_making_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -