Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Higher vaccine effectiveness in seasons with predominant circulation of seasonal influenza A(H1N1) than in A(H3N2) seasons: test-negative case-control studies using surveillance data, Spain, 2003-2011.
Vaccine 2014; 32(35):4404-11V

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We used data provided by the Spanish influenza surveillance system to measure seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) against medically attended cases, laboratory confirmed with the predominately circulating influenza virus over eight seasons (2003-2011).

METHODS

Using the test-negative case-control design, we compared the vaccination status of swabbed influenza-like illnesses (ILI) patients who were laboratory confirmed with predominantly circulating influenza strain in the season (cases) to that of ILI patients testing negative for any influenza (controls). Data on age, sex, vaccination status and laboratory results were available for all seasons. We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted influenza VE for age, week of swabbing, Spanish region and season. We calculated the influenza VE by each season and pooling the seasons with the same predominant type/subtype.

RESULTS

Overall influenza VE against infection with A(H3N2) subtype (four seasons) was 31 (95% confidence interval (CI):10; 48). For seasonal influenza A(H1N1) (two seasons), the effectiveness was 86% (95% CI: 65; 94). Against B infection (three seasons), influenza VE was 47% (95% CI: 27; 62).

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish influenza surveillance system allowed estimating influenza VE in the studied seasons for the predominant strain. Strengthening the influenza surveillance will result in more precise VE estimates for decision making.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Institute of Health Carlos III, National Centre of Epidemiology, c/Monforte de Lemos No. 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: camisav@gmail.com.Institute of Health Carlos III, National Centre of Epidemiology, c/Monforte de Lemos No. 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.Institute of Health Carlos III, National Centre of Epidemiology, c/Monforte de Lemos No. 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.Institute of Health Carlos III, National Centre of Epidemiology, c/Monforte de Lemos No. 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.Institute of Health Carlos III, Influenza Reference Laboratory, WHO National Influenza Centre, National Centre for Microbiology, 28220 Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.Institute of Health Carlos III, Influenza Reference Laboratory, WHO National Influenza Centre, National Centre for Microbiology, 28220 Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.Institute of Health Carlos III, National Centre of Epidemiology, c/Monforte de Lemos No. 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.No affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

24968153

Citation

Savulescu, Camelia, et al. "Higher Vaccine Effectiveness in Seasons With Predominant Circulation of Seasonal Influenza A(H1N1) Than in A(H3N2) Seasons: Test-negative Case-control Studies Using Surveillance Data, Spain, 2003-2011." Vaccine, vol. 32, no. 35, 2014, pp. 4404-11.
Savulescu C, Jiménez-Jorge S, Delgado-Sanz C, et al. Higher vaccine effectiveness in seasons with predominant circulation of seasonal influenza A(H1N1) than in A(H3N2) seasons: test-negative case-control studies using surveillance data, Spain, 2003-2011. Vaccine. 2014;32(35):4404-11.
Savulescu, C., Jiménez-Jorge, S., Delgado-Sanz, C., de Mateo, S., Pozo, F., Casas, I., & Larrauri, A. (2014). Higher vaccine effectiveness in seasons with predominant circulation of seasonal influenza A(H1N1) than in A(H3N2) seasons: test-negative case-control studies using surveillance data, Spain, 2003-2011. Vaccine, 32(35), pp. 4404-11. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.063.
Savulescu C, et al. Higher Vaccine Effectiveness in Seasons With Predominant Circulation of Seasonal Influenza A(H1N1) Than in A(H3N2) Seasons: Test-negative Case-control Studies Using Surveillance Data, Spain, 2003-2011. Vaccine. 2014 Jul 31;32(35):4404-11. PubMed PMID: 24968153.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Higher vaccine effectiveness in seasons with predominant circulation of seasonal influenza A(H1N1) than in A(H3N2) seasons: test-negative case-control studies using surveillance data, Spain, 2003-2011. AU - Savulescu,Camelia, AU - Jiménez-Jorge,Silvia, AU - Delgado-Sanz,Concha, AU - de Mateo,Salvador, AU - Pozo,Francisco, AU - Casas,Inmaculada, AU - Larrauri,Amparo, AU - ,, Y1 - 2014/06/23/ PY - 2014/02/22/received PY - 2014/05/29/revised PY - 2014/06/12/accepted PY - 2014/6/27/entrez PY - 2014/6/27/pubmed PY - 2015/3/31/medline KW - Case control studies KW - Effectiveness KW - Influenza KW - Sentinel surveillance KW - Vaccines and immunisation SP - 4404 EP - 11 JF - Vaccine JO - Vaccine VL - 32 IS - 35 N2 - BACKGROUND: We used data provided by the Spanish influenza surveillance system to measure seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) against medically attended cases, laboratory confirmed with the predominately circulating influenza virus over eight seasons (2003-2011). METHODS: Using the test-negative case-control design, we compared the vaccination status of swabbed influenza-like illnesses (ILI) patients who were laboratory confirmed with predominantly circulating influenza strain in the season (cases) to that of ILI patients testing negative for any influenza (controls). Data on age, sex, vaccination status and laboratory results were available for all seasons. We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted influenza VE for age, week of swabbing, Spanish region and season. We calculated the influenza VE by each season and pooling the seasons with the same predominant type/subtype. RESULTS: Overall influenza VE against infection with A(H3N2) subtype (four seasons) was 31 (95% confidence interval (CI):10; 48). For seasonal influenza A(H1N1) (two seasons), the effectiveness was 86% (95% CI: 65; 94). Against B infection (three seasons), influenza VE was 47% (95% CI: 27; 62). CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish influenza surveillance system allowed estimating influenza VE in the studied seasons for the predominant strain. Strengthening the influenza surveillance will result in more precise VE estimates for decision making. SN - 1873-2518 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/24968153/Higher_vaccine_effectiveness_in_seasons_with_predominant_circulation_of_seasonal_influenza_A_H1N1__than_in_A_H3N2__seasons:_test_negative_case_control_studies_using_surveillance_data_Spain_2003_2011_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264-410X(14)00864-0 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -