Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Sex differences in antinociceptive tolerance to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the rat.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Oct 01; 143:22-8.DA

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sex differences in cannabinoid effects have been reported in rodents, with adult females typically being more sensitive than adult males. The present study compared the development of antinociceptive tolerance to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in adult, gonadally intact female vs. male rats.

METHODS

Cumulative dose-effect curves were obtained for THC (1.0-18 mg/kg i.p.) on warm water tail withdrawal and paw pressure tests. Vehicle or the sex-specific ED80 dose for THC was administered twice daily for 9 days; THC dose-effect curves were then re-determined.

RESULTS

On the pre-chronic test day, THC was significantly more potent in females than males in producing antinociception on the tail withdrawal and paw pressure tests. After 9 days of twice-daily THC treatment (5.4 mg/kg/injection in females and 7.6 mg/kg/injection in males), THC potency on both tests decreased more in females than males. On the tail withdrawal test, chronic THC produced 4.2- vs. 2.8-fold increases in ED50 values in females vs. males, respectively. On the paw pressure test, chronic THC produced 4.4- vs. 2.9-fold increases in ED50 values in females vs. males, respectively. Chronic THC treatment did not significantly disrupt estrous cycling in females.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that--even when sex differences in acute THC potency are controlled--females develop more antinociceptive tolerance to THC than males. Given the importance of drug tolerance in the development of drug dependence, these results suggest that females may be more vulnerable than males to developing dependence after chronic cannabinoid exposure.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4820, USA.RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA.Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4820, USA. Electronic address: craft@wsu.edu.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Language

eng

PubMed ID

25131716

Citation

Wakley, Alexa A., et al. "Sex Differences in Antinociceptive Tolerance to Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the Rat." Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 143, 2014, pp. 22-8.
Wakley AA, Wiley JL, Craft RM. Sex differences in antinociceptive tolerance to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the rat. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;143:22-8.
Wakley, A. A., Wiley, J. L., & Craft, R. M. (2014). Sex differences in antinociceptive tolerance to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the rat. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 143, 22-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.029
Wakley AA, Wiley JL, Craft RM. Sex Differences in Antinociceptive Tolerance to Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the Rat. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Oct 1;143:22-8. PubMed PMID: 25131716.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Sex differences in antinociceptive tolerance to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the rat. AU - Wakley,Alexa A, AU - Wiley,Jenny L, AU - Craft,Rebecca M, Y1 - 2014/08/02/ PY - 2014/03/26/received PY - 2014/07/21/revised PY - 2014/07/24/accepted PY - 2014/8/19/entrez PY - 2014/8/19/pubmed PY - 2015/9/17/medline KW - Antinociception KW - Cannabinoid KW - Estrous cycle KW - Locomotion KW - Pain KW - Sex differences SP - 22 EP - 8 JF - Drug and alcohol dependence JO - Drug Alcohol Depend VL - 143 N2 - BACKGROUND: Sex differences in cannabinoid effects have been reported in rodents, with adult females typically being more sensitive than adult males. The present study compared the development of antinociceptive tolerance to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in adult, gonadally intact female vs. male rats. METHODS: Cumulative dose-effect curves were obtained for THC (1.0-18 mg/kg i.p.) on warm water tail withdrawal and paw pressure tests. Vehicle or the sex-specific ED80 dose for THC was administered twice daily for 9 days; THC dose-effect curves were then re-determined. RESULTS: On the pre-chronic test day, THC was significantly more potent in females than males in producing antinociception on the tail withdrawal and paw pressure tests. After 9 days of twice-daily THC treatment (5.4 mg/kg/injection in females and 7.6 mg/kg/injection in males), THC potency on both tests decreased more in females than males. On the tail withdrawal test, chronic THC produced 4.2- vs. 2.8-fold increases in ED50 values in females vs. males, respectively. On the paw pressure test, chronic THC produced 4.4- vs. 2.9-fold increases in ED50 values in females vs. males, respectively. Chronic THC treatment did not significantly disrupt estrous cycling in females. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that--even when sex differences in acute THC potency are controlled--females develop more antinociceptive tolerance to THC than males. Given the importance of drug tolerance in the development of drug dependence, these results suggest that females may be more vulnerable than males to developing dependence after chronic cannabinoid exposure. SN - 1879-0046 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/25131716/Sex_differences_in_antinociceptive_tolerance_to_delta_9_tetrahydrocannabinol_in_the_rat_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -