Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of three algorithms for the baseline correction of hyphenated data objects.
Anal Chem. 2014 Sep 16; 86(18):9050-7.AC

Abstract

Three novel two-way baseline correction algorithms, that is, orthogonal basis (OB), fuzzy optimal associative memory (FOAM), and polynomial fitting (PF), were evaluated with high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) data objects. Among these algorithms, both OB and FOAM are two-way baseline correction algorithms, which reconstruct the entire two-way backgrounds from blank data objects, while the PF algorithm is a pseudo-two-way method, which models each ion chromatogram baseline with a third-order polynomial. The performance of baseline correction methods was first evaluated with respect to the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of 4 major peaks of the HPLC-MS total ion current (TIC) chromatograms of celery seed extracts. Then, the effect of baseline correction on pattern recognition was evaluated by using 42 two-way headspace (HS) solid phase microextraction (SPME) GC/MS data objects of 7 polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) mixture standard solutions. Two types of classifiers, that is, a fuzzy rule-building expert system (FuRES) and partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were evaluated in parallel. Bootstrapped Latin partitions (BLPs) were used to give an unbiased and generalized evaluation of the classification accuracy. Results indicate that SNRs of major peaks of the TIC chromatogram representative of two-way HPLC-MS data objects are increased by baseline correction. In addition, higher prediction accuracies can be obtained by performing baseline correction on the entire GC/MS data set prior to pattern recognition. It is also found that proper data transformation is able to improve the performance of baseline correction. This report is the first of two-way baseline correction methods for hyphenated chromatography/mass spectrometry data objects. Both the orthogonal basis and FOAM baseline correction methods are novel in-house algorithms and proved to be generally effective for two-way baseline correction in the present study. Polynomial fitting is a conventional baseline correction method for one-way data objects and is applied to two-way data objects for the first time. It is applicable when blank data objects are unavailable.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Center for Intelligent Chemical Instrumentation, Clippinger Laboratories, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio University , Athens, Ohio 45701-2979, United States.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

25155430

Citation

Wang, Zhengfang, et al. "Comparison of Three Algorithms for the Baseline Correction of Hyphenated Data Objects." Analytical Chemistry, vol. 86, no. 18, 2014, pp. 9050-7.
Wang Z, Zhang M, Harrington Pde B. Comparison of three algorithms for the baseline correction of hyphenated data objects. Anal Chem. 2014;86(18):9050-7.
Wang, Z., Zhang, M., & Harrington, P. d. e. . B. (2014). Comparison of three algorithms for the baseline correction of hyphenated data objects. Analytical Chemistry, 86(18), 9050-7. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac501658k
Wang Z, Zhang M, Harrington Pde B. Comparison of Three Algorithms for the Baseline Correction of Hyphenated Data Objects. Anal Chem. 2014 Sep 16;86(18):9050-7. PubMed PMID: 25155430.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of three algorithms for the baseline correction of hyphenated data objects. AU - Wang,Zhengfang, AU - Zhang,Mengliang, AU - Harrington,Peter de B, Y1 - 2014/09/03/ PY - 2014/8/27/entrez PY - 2014/8/27/pubmed PY - 2014/8/27/medline SP - 9050 EP - 7 JF - Analytical chemistry JO - Anal Chem VL - 86 IS - 18 N2 - Three novel two-way baseline correction algorithms, that is, orthogonal basis (OB), fuzzy optimal associative memory (FOAM), and polynomial fitting (PF), were evaluated with high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) data objects. Among these algorithms, both OB and FOAM are two-way baseline correction algorithms, which reconstruct the entire two-way backgrounds from blank data objects, while the PF algorithm is a pseudo-two-way method, which models each ion chromatogram baseline with a third-order polynomial. The performance of baseline correction methods was first evaluated with respect to the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of 4 major peaks of the HPLC-MS total ion current (TIC) chromatograms of celery seed extracts. Then, the effect of baseline correction on pattern recognition was evaluated by using 42 two-way headspace (HS) solid phase microextraction (SPME) GC/MS data objects of 7 polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) mixture standard solutions. Two types of classifiers, that is, a fuzzy rule-building expert system (FuRES) and partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were evaluated in parallel. Bootstrapped Latin partitions (BLPs) were used to give an unbiased and generalized evaluation of the classification accuracy. Results indicate that SNRs of major peaks of the TIC chromatogram representative of two-way HPLC-MS data objects are increased by baseline correction. In addition, higher prediction accuracies can be obtained by performing baseline correction on the entire GC/MS data set prior to pattern recognition. It is also found that proper data transformation is able to improve the performance of baseline correction. This report is the first of two-way baseline correction methods for hyphenated chromatography/mass spectrometry data objects. Both the orthogonal basis and FOAM baseline correction methods are novel in-house algorithms and proved to be generally effective for two-way baseline correction in the present study. Polynomial fitting is a conventional baseline correction method for one-way data objects and is applied to two-way data objects for the first time. It is applicable when blank data objects are unavailable. SN - 1520-6882 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/25155430/Comparison_of_three_algorithms_for_the_baseline_correction_of_hyphenated_data_objects_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.