Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Identifying veterinary students' capacity for moral behavior concerning animal ethics issues.
J Vet Med Educ. 2014 Winter; 41(4):358-70.JV

Abstract

Veterinarians face unique animal ethics challenges as practitioners and policy advisors to government and industry. Changing societal attitudes, cultural diversity, and the often conflicting needs and interests of patients and clients contribute to moral distress. Yet little has been done to identify veterinarians' capacity to address these animal ethics issues. In this study, first-year and final-year veterinary students in an Australian university were surveyed to explore moral sensitivity, moral motivation, and moral character and their relationship with moral reasoning. The majority of students were concerned about animal ethics issues and had experienced moral distress in relation to the treatment of animals. Most believed that veterinarians should address the wider social issues of animal protection and that veterinary medicine should require a commitment to animals' interests over owners'/caregivers' interests. There was less agreement that the veterinary profession was sufficiently involved in addressing animal ethics issues. The principal motivators for studying veterinary medicine were, in declining importance, enjoyment in working with animals, helping sick and injured animals, and improving the way animals are treated. However, most students had taken little or no action to address animal ethics issues. These results suggest that both first- and fifth-year veterinary students are sensitive to animal ethics issues and are motivated to prioritize the interests of animals but have little experience in taking action to address these issues. Further research is needed to determine ways to identify and assess these moral behavior components in veterinary education to develop veterinarians' capacity to address animal ethics issues.

Authors

No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

25335645

Citation

Verrinder, Joy M., and Clive J C. Phillips. "Identifying Veterinary Students' Capacity for Moral Behavior Concerning Animal Ethics Issues." Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, vol. 41, no. 4, 2014, pp. 358-70.
Verrinder JM, Phillips CJ. Identifying veterinary students' capacity for moral behavior concerning animal ethics issues. J Vet Med Educ. 2014;41(4):358-70.
Verrinder, J. M., & Phillips, C. J. (2014). Identifying veterinary students' capacity for moral behavior concerning animal ethics issues. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 41(4), 358-70. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1113-153R
Verrinder JM, Phillips CJ. Identifying Veterinary Students' Capacity for Moral Behavior Concerning Animal Ethics Issues. J Vet Med Educ. 2014;41(4):358-70. PubMed PMID: 25335645.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Identifying veterinary students' capacity for moral behavior concerning animal ethics issues. AU - Verrinder,Joy M, AU - Phillips,Clive J C, PY - 2014/10/23/entrez PY - 2014/10/23/pubmed PY - 2015/2/25/medline KW - animal ethics KW - ethical sensitivity KW - moral behavior KW - moral motivation KW - moral reasoning KW - veterinary education SP - 358 EP - 70 JF - Journal of veterinary medical education JO - J Vet Med Educ VL - 41 IS - 4 N2 - Veterinarians face unique animal ethics challenges as practitioners and policy advisors to government and industry. Changing societal attitudes, cultural diversity, and the often conflicting needs and interests of patients and clients contribute to moral distress. Yet little has been done to identify veterinarians' capacity to address these animal ethics issues. In this study, first-year and final-year veterinary students in an Australian university were surveyed to explore moral sensitivity, moral motivation, and moral character and their relationship with moral reasoning. The majority of students were concerned about animal ethics issues and had experienced moral distress in relation to the treatment of animals. Most believed that veterinarians should address the wider social issues of animal protection and that veterinary medicine should require a commitment to animals' interests over owners'/caregivers' interests. There was less agreement that the veterinary profession was sufficiently involved in addressing animal ethics issues. The principal motivators for studying veterinary medicine were, in declining importance, enjoyment in working with animals, helping sick and injured animals, and improving the way animals are treated. However, most students had taken little or no action to address animal ethics issues. These results suggest that both first- and fifth-year veterinary students are sensitive to animal ethics issues and are motivated to prioritize the interests of animals but have little experience in taking action to address these issues. Further research is needed to determine ways to identify and assess these moral behavior components in veterinary education to develop veterinarians' capacity to address animal ethics issues. SN - 0748-321X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/25335645/Identifying_veterinary_students'_capacity_for_moral_behavior_concerning_animal_ethics_issues_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -