Citation
Belone, Lorenda, et al. "Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity." Qualitative Health Research, vol. 26, no. 1, 2016, pp. 117-35.
Belone L, Lucero JE, Duran B, et al. Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(1):117-35.
Belone, L., Lucero, J. E., Duran, B., Tafoya, G., Baker, E. A., Chan, D., Chang, C., Greene-Moton, E., Kelley, M. A., & Wallerstein, N. (2016). Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity. Qualitative Health Research, 26(1), 117-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314557084
Belone L, et al. Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(1):117-35. PubMed PMID: 25361792.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity.
AU - Belone,Lorenda,
AU - Lucero,Julie E,
AU - Duran,Bonnie,
AU - Tafoya,Greg,
AU - Baker,Elizabeth A,
AU - Chan,Domin,
AU - Chang,Charlotte,
AU - Greene-Moton,Ella,
AU - Kelley,Michele A,
AU - Wallerstein,Nina,
Y1 - 2014/10/31/
PY - 2014/11/2/entrez
PY - 2014/11/2/pubmed
PY - 2017/4/14/medline
KW - community and public health
KW - community based participatory research
KW - focus groups
KW - participatory action research (PAR)
KW - qualitative analysis
KW - reflexivity
KW - relationships
KW - research participation
KW - theory development
KW - trust
KW - validity
SP - 117
EP - 35
JF - Qualitative health research
JO - Qual Health Res
VL - 26
IS - 1
N2 - A national community-based participatory research (CBPR) team developed a conceptual model of CBPR partnerships to understand the contribution of partnership processes to improved community capacity and health outcomes. With the model primarily developed through academic literature and expert consensus building, we sought community input to assess face validity and acceptability. Our research team conducted semi-structured focus groups with six partnerships nationwide. Participants validated and expanded on existing model constructs and identified new constructs based on "real-world" praxis, resulting in a revised model. Four cross-cutting constructs were identified: trust development, capacity, mutual learning, and power dynamics. By empirically testing the model, we found community face validity and capacity to adapt the model to diverse contexts. We recommend partnerships use and adapt the CBPR model and its constructs, for collective reflection and evaluation, to enhance their partnering practices and achieve their health and research goals.
SN - 1049-7323
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/25361792/Community_Based_Participatory_Research_Conceptual_Model:_Community_Partner_Consultation_and_Face_Validity_
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -