Abstract
BACKGROUND
Evolutionary psychologists hypothesized that men are more upset by sexual infidelity than women are, whereas women are more upset by emotional infidelity than men are. On the other hand, the sexual imagination hypothesis states that gender differences in infidelity responses are derived from explicit men's sexual imagery. Based on the latter hypothesis, we hypothesized that although men would report being more distressed by sexual infidelity than women who were not in a committed relationship (NCR), no gender difference would be reported in a committed relationship (CR).
FINDINGS
These two hypotheses were tested with 598 participants in a CR and 1,643 participants in a NCR. No significant gender difference was found sexual infidelity response in the CR group (d=0.008, a power of .956), whereas men were more upset than women about sexual infidelity in the NCR group. Moreover, a significant interaction between gender and infidelity type was found in the NCR, whereas no significant interaction between gender and infidelity type was observed in the CR group (partial η2=0.005, a power of .943).
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings supported the sexual imagination hypothesis but were inconsistent with the EJM hypothesis.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing the sexual imagination hypothesis for gender differences in response to infidelity.
A1 - Kato,Tsukasa,
Y1 - 2014/11/29/
PY - 2014/05/26/received
PY - 2014/11/25/accepted
PY - 2014/11/30/entrez
PY - 2014/11/30/pubmed
PY - 2016/3/8/medline
SP - 860
EP - 860
JF - BMC research notes
JO - BMC Res Notes
VL - 7
N2 - BACKGROUND: Evolutionary psychologists hypothesized that men are more upset by sexual infidelity than women are, whereas women are more upset by emotional infidelity than men are. On the other hand, the sexual imagination hypothesis states that gender differences in infidelity responses are derived from explicit men's sexual imagery. Based on the latter hypothesis, we hypothesized that although men would report being more distressed by sexual infidelity than women who were not in a committed relationship (NCR), no gender difference would be reported in a committed relationship (CR). FINDINGS: These two hypotheses were tested with 598 participants in a CR and 1,643 participants in a NCR. No significant gender difference was found sexual infidelity response in the CR group (d=0.008, a power of .956), whereas men were more upset than women about sexual infidelity in the NCR group. Moreover, a significant interaction between gender and infidelity type was found in the NCR, whereas no significant interaction between gender and infidelity type was observed in the CR group (partial η2=0.005, a power of .943). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings supported the sexual imagination hypothesis but were inconsistent with the EJM hypothesis.
SN - 1756-0500
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/25432800/Testing_the_sexual_imagination_hypothesis_for_gender_differences_in_response_to_infidelity_
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -