Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Prevalence and prognostic implications of vitamin D deficiency in chronic kidney disease.
Dis Markers. 2015; 2015:868961.DM

Abstract

Vitamin D is an important nutrient involved in bone mineral metabolism, and vitamin D status is reflected by serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations. Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and nutritional vitamin D supplementation decreases elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations in subgroups of these patients. Furthermore, vitamin D is supposed to have pleiotropic effects on various diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, malignancies, infectious diseases, diabetes, and autoimmune diseases. Indeed, there is cumulative evidence showing the associations of low vitamin D with the development and progression of CKD, cardiovascular complication, and high mortality. Recently, genetic polymorphisms in vitamin D-binding protein have received great attention because they largely affect bioavailable 25(OH)D concentrations. This finding suggests that the serum total 25(OH)D concentrations would not be comparable among different gene polymorphisms and thus may be inappropriate as an index of vitamin D status. This finding may refute the conventional definition of vitamin D status based solely on serum total 25(OH)D concentrations.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Geriatric Medicine & Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.Department of Comprehensive Kidney Disease Research, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.Department of Geriatric Medicine & Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

25883412

Citation

Obi, Yoshitsugu, et al. "Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Vitamin D Deficiency in Chronic Kidney Disease." Disease Markers, vol. 2015, 2015, p. 868961.
Obi Y, Hamano T, Isaka Y. Prevalence and prognostic implications of vitamin D deficiency in chronic kidney disease. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:868961.
Obi, Y., Hamano, T., & Isaka, Y. (2015). Prevalence and prognostic implications of vitamin D deficiency in chronic kidney disease. Disease Markers, 2015, 868961. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/868961
Obi Y, Hamano T, Isaka Y. Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Vitamin D Deficiency in Chronic Kidney Disease. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:868961. PubMed PMID: 25883412.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Prevalence and prognostic implications of vitamin D deficiency in chronic kidney disease. AU - Obi,Yoshitsugu, AU - Hamano,Takayuki, AU - Isaka,Yoshitaka, Y1 - 2015/03/26/ PY - 2015/01/20/received PY - 2015/03/11/accepted PY - 2015/4/18/entrez PY - 2015/4/18/pubmed PY - 2015/12/15/medline SP - 868961 EP - 868961 JF - Disease markers JO - Dis Markers VL - 2015 N2 - Vitamin D is an important nutrient involved in bone mineral metabolism, and vitamin D status is reflected by serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations. Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and nutritional vitamin D supplementation decreases elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations in subgroups of these patients. Furthermore, vitamin D is supposed to have pleiotropic effects on various diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, malignancies, infectious diseases, diabetes, and autoimmune diseases. Indeed, there is cumulative evidence showing the associations of low vitamin D with the development and progression of CKD, cardiovascular complication, and high mortality. Recently, genetic polymorphisms in vitamin D-binding protein have received great attention because they largely affect bioavailable 25(OH)D concentrations. This finding suggests that the serum total 25(OH)D concentrations would not be comparable among different gene polymorphisms and thus may be inappropriate as an index of vitamin D status. This finding may refute the conventional definition of vitamin D status based solely on serum total 25(OH)D concentrations. SN - 1875-8630 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/25883412/full_citation DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -