Citation
Feng, Yunzi, et al. "Approaches of Aroma Extraction Dilution Analysis (AEDA) for Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-olfactometry (HS-SPME-GC-O): Altering Sample Amount, Diluting the Sample or Adjusting Split Ratio?" Food Chemistry, vol. 187, 2015, pp. 44-52.
Feng Y, Cai Y, Sun-Waterhouse D, et al. Approaches of aroma extraction dilution analysis (AEDA) for headspace solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-olfactometry (HS-SPME-GC-O): Altering sample amount, diluting the sample or adjusting split ratio? Food Chem. 2015;187:44-52.
Feng, Y., Cai, Y., Sun-Waterhouse, D., Cui, C., Su, G., Lin, L., & Zhao, M. (2015). Approaches of aroma extraction dilution analysis (AEDA) for headspace solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-olfactometry (HS-SPME-GC-O): Altering sample amount, diluting the sample or adjusting split ratio? Food Chemistry, 187, 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.138
Feng Y, et al. Approaches of Aroma Extraction Dilution Analysis (AEDA) for Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-olfactometry (HS-SPME-GC-O): Altering Sample Amount, Diluting the Sample or Adjusting Split Ratio. Food Chem. 2015 Nov 15;187:44-52. PubMed PMID: 25976996.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Approaches of aroma extraction dilution analysis (AEDA) for headspace solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-olfactometry (HS-SPME-GC-O): Altering sample amount, diluting the sample or adjusting split ratio?
AU - Feng,Yunzi,
AU - Cai,Yu,
AU - Sun-Waterhouse,Dongxiao,
AU - Cui,Chun,
AU - Su,Guowan,
AU - Lin,Lianzhu,
AU - Zhao,Mouming,
Y1 - 2015/04/03/
PY - 2014/12/05/received
PY - 2015/02/22/revised
PY - 2015/03/16/accepted
PY - 2015/5/16/entrez
PY - 2015/5/16/pubmed
PY - 2016/1/27/medline
KW - Dilution analysis
KW - GC–O
KW - HS-SPME–AEDA
KW - Split ratio
SP - 44
EP - 52
JF - Food chemistry
JO - Food Chem
VL - 187
N2 - Aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) is widely used for the screening of aroma-active compounds in gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O). In this study, three aroma dilution methods, (I) using different test sample volumes, (II) diluting samples, and (III) adjusting the GC injector split ratio, were compared for the analysis of volatiles by using HS-SPME-AEDA. Results showed that adjusting the GC injector split ratio (III) was the most desirable approach, based on the linearity relationships between Ln (normalised peak area) and Ln (normalised flavour dilution factors). Thereafter this dilution method was applied in the analysis of aroma-active compounds in Japanese soy sauce and 36 key odorants were found in this study. The most intense aroma-active components in Japanese soy sauce were: ethyl 2-methylpropanoate, ethyl 2-methylbutanoate, ethyl 3-methylbutanoate, ethyl 4-methylpentanoate, 3-(methylthio)propanal, 1-octen-3-ol, 2-methoxyphenol, 4-ethyl-2-methoxyphenol, 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol, 2-phenylethanol, and 4-hydroxy-5-ethyl-2-methyl-3(2H)-furanone.
SN - 1873-7072
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/25976996/Approaches_of_aroma_extraction_dilution_analysis__AEDA__for_headspace_solid_phase_microextraction_and_gas_chromatography_olfactometry__HS_SPME_GC_O_:_Altering_sample_amount_diluting_the_sample_or_adjusting_split_ratio
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -