Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Mini Sling (Ophira) versus Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Medium-term Follow-up.
Prague Med Rep. 2015; 116(3):210-8.PM

Abstract

To compare two different procedures, mid-urethral mini sling (Ophira) and autologous rectus fascia sling, according to their medium-term subjective and objective outcome and satisfaction rates in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. One hundred women with the main complaint of stress urinary incontinence were randomized to be treated with either mini sling (Ophira) or autologous rectus facia pubovaginal sling. Preoperative evaluation consisted of: physical examination, blood biochemistry urine analysis and culture, urinary tract ultrasound scan, conventional multi-channel urodynamic study, cystourethroscopy, cough induced stress test and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ). The patients were objectively and subjectively re-evaluated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 postoperative months and the last visit and the collected data of more than one year follow-up were compared with preoperative assessments. Seventy two out of one hundred patients were followed for a mean time of 13.8±4.4 months (12-20 months range). Objective cure rate, according to cough-induced stress test was recorded in 88.6% and 89.2% of the mini sling (Ophira) and the rectus facia sling group respectively (P=1.0). Postoperative mean IIQ score decreased to 42.7±11.4 and 50.2±11.1 in the mini sling (Ophira) group versus rectus facia pubovaginal sling (P=0.007). Twenty eight (80%) and 23 (67%) patients in the mini sling (Ophira) and rectus facia pubovaginal sling were satisfied with the operation (P=0.23). There is no significant difference between the mini sling (Ophira) and autologous rectus fascia sling procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence at medium-term follow-up.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Department of Urology, Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Department of Urology, Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Department of Urology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.Department of Urology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. b_narouie@yahoo.com. Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Department of Urology, Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. b_narouie@yahoo.com.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

26445392

Citation

Sharifiaghdas, Farzaneh, et al. "Mini Sling (Ophira) Versus Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Medium-term Follow-up." Prague Medical Report, vol. 116, no. 3, 2015, pp. 210-8.
Sharifiaghdas F, Nasiri M, Mirzaei M, et al. Mini Sling (Ophira) versus Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Medium-term Follow-up. Prague Med Rep. 2015;116(3):210-8.
Sharifiaghdas, F., Nasiri, M., Mirzaei, M., & Narouie, B. (2015). Mini Sling (Ophira) versus Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Medium-term Follow-up. Prague Medical Report, 116(3), 210-8. https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2015.60
Sharifiaghdas F, et al. Mini Sling (Ophira) Versus Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Medium-term Follow-up. Prague Med Rep. 2015;116(3):210-8. PubMed PMID: 26445392.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Mini Sling (Ophira) versus Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Medium-term Follow-up. AU - Sharifiaghdas,Farzaneh, AU - Nasiri,Mahmoodreza, AU - Mirzaei,Mahboubeh, AU - Narouie,Behzad, PY - 2015/10/8/entrez PY - 2015/10/9/pubmed PY - 2015/12/30/medline KW - Autologous KW - Mid-urethral mini sling KW - Ophira KW - Stress urinary incontinence SP - 210 EP - 8 JF - Prague medical report JO - Prague Med Rep VL - 116 IS - 3 N2 - To compare two different procedures, mid-urethral mini sling (Ophira) and autologous rectus fascia sling, according to their medium-term subjective and objective outcome and satisfaction rates in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. One hundred women with the main complaint of stress urinary incontinence were randomized to be treated with either mini sling (Ophira) or autologous rectus facia pubovaginal sling. Preoperative evaluation consisted of: physical examination, blood biochemistry urine analysis and culture, urinary tract ultrasound scan, conventional multi-channel urodynamic study, cystourethroscopy, cough induced stress test and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ). The patients were objectively and subjectively re-evaluated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 postoperative months and the last visit and the collected data of more than one year follow-up were compared with preoperative assessments. Seventy two out of one hundred patients were followed for a mean time of 13.8±4.4 months (12-20 months range). Objective cure rate, according to cough-induced stress test was recorded in 88.6% and 89.2% of the mini sling (Ophira) and the rectus facia sling group respectively (P=1.0). Postoperative mean IIQ score decreased to 42.7±11.4 and 50.2±11.1 in the mini sling (Ophira) group versus rectus facia pubovaginal sling (P=0.007). Twenty eight (80%) and 23 (67%) patients in the mini sling (Ophira) and rectus facia pubovaginal sling were satisfied with the operation (P=0.23). There is no significant difference between the mini sling (Ophira) and autologous rectus fascia sling procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence at medium-term follow-up. SN - 1214-6994 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/26445392/Mini_Sling__Ophira__versus_Pubovaginal_Sling_for_Treatment_of_Stress_Urinary_Incontinence:_A_Medium_term_Follow_up_ L2 - https://pmr.lf1.cuni.cz/fulltext/?doi=10.14712/23362936.2015.60 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -