Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Peer Review: Lessons Learned in A Pediatric Radiology Department.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 Mar-Apr; 45(2):139-48.CP

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to illustrate types of diagnostic errors and feedback given to radiologists, using cases to support and clarify these categories. A comment-enhanced peer review system may be leveraged to generate a comprehensive feedback categorization scheme. These include errors of observation, errors of interpretation, inadequate patient data gathering, errors of communication, interobserver variability, informational feedback, and compliments. Much of this feedback is captured through comments associated with interpretative agreements.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: stanescu@u.washington.edu.Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

26489791

Citation

Stanescu, A Luana, et al. "Peer Review: Lessons Learned in a Pediatric Radiology Department." Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, vol. 45, no. 2, 2016, pp. 139-48.
Stanescu AL, Parisi MT, Weinberger E, et al. Peer Review: Lessons Learned in A Pediatric Radiology Department. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016;45(2):139-48.
Stanescu, A. L., Parisi, M. T., Weinberger, E., Ferguson, M. R., Otto, R. K., & Iyer, R. S. (2016). Peer Review: Lessons Learned in A Pediatric Radiology Department. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, 45(2), 139-48. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.09.001
Stanescu AL, et al. Peer Review: Lessons Learned in a Pediatric Radiology Department. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;45(2):139-48. PubMed PMID: 26489791.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Peer Review: Lessons Learned in A Pediatric Radiology Department. AU - Stanescu,A Luana, AU - Parisi,Marguerite T, AU - Weinberger,Edward, AU - Ferguson,Mark R, AU - Otto,Randolph K, AU - Iyer,Ramesh S, Y1 - 2015/09/14/ PY - 2015/08/13/received PY - 2015/09/05/accepted PY - 2015/10/23/entrez PY - 2015/10/23/pubmed PY - 2016/12/15/medline SP - 139 EP - 48 JF - Current problems in diagnostic radiology JO - Curr Probl Diagn Radiol VL - 45 IS - 2 N2 - The purpose of this article is to illustrate types of diagnostic errors and feedback given to radiologists, using cases to support and clarify these categories. A comment-enhanced peer review system may be leveraged to generate a comprehensive feedback categorization scheme. These include errors of observation, errors of interpretation, inadequate patient data gathering, errors of communication, interobserver variability, informational feedback, and compliments. Much of this feedback is captured through comments associated with interpretative agreements. SN - 1535-6302 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/26489791/Peer_Review:_Lessons_Learned_in_A_Pediatric_Radiology_Department_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0363-0188(15)30011-6 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -