Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Effect of pump versus pen treatment on glycaemic control and kidney function in long-term uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM).
Dan Med Bull. 1989 Apr; 36(2):176-8.DM

Abstract

Glycaemic control on pump versus pen treatment was evaluated and the effects of optimised metabolic control on kidney function was studied in very long-term uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Ten otherwise healthy patients participated, age: 36.5 yr +/- 7.9, diabetes duration: 23.7 yr +/- 2.9, urinary albumin excretion (UAE): 5.8 micrograms/min x/ divided by 2.2, se-creatinine and blood pressure were normal and only background retinopathy was present. A 2 x 6 months randomised cross-over study was performed using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple injection technique (MIT). Glycaemic control was evaluated by a six point profile every two weeks and by measuring HbA1c monthly. At 0, 6 and 12 months, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) were measured by the constant infusion technique, and UAE by radioimmunoassay. Glycaemic control was significantly better on CSII as compared to MIT (p = 0.01) or pre-study conventional treatment (CT), p = 0.03, whereas there was no difference between MIT and CT. There was no change in kidney function during either treatment. Thus, in these very long-term uncomplicated patients, glycaemic control was significantly improved during CSII. In spite of this, no change was found in GFR, which might suggest that in long-standing diabetes, kidney function is unaltered by changes in metabolic control.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Second University Clinic of Internal Medicine, Aarhus Kommunehospital, Denmark.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

2651031

Citation

Schmitz, A, et al. "Effect of Pump Versus Pen Treatment On Glycaemic Control and Kidney Function in Long-term Uncomplicated Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM)." Danish Medical Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 2, 1989, pp. 176-8.
Schmitz A, Christiansen JS, Christensen CK, et al. Effect of pump versus pen treatment on glycaemic control and kidney function in long-term uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Dan Med Bull. 1989;36(2):176-8.
Schmitz, A., Christiansen, J. S., Christensen, C. K., Hermansen, K., & Mogensen, C. E. (1989). Effect of pump versus pen treatment on glycaemic control and kidney function in long-term uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Danish Medical Bulletin, 36(2), 176-8.
Schmitz A, et al. Effect of Pump Versus Pen Treatment On Glycaemic Control and Kidney Function in Long-term Uncomplicated Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM). Dan Med Bull. 1989;36(2):176-8. PubMed PMID: 2651031.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of pump versus pen treatment on glycaemic control and kidney function in long-term uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). AU - Schmitz,A, AU - Christiansen,J S, AU - Christensen,C K, AU - Hermansen,K, AU - Mogensen,C E, PY - 1989/4/1/pubmed PY - 1989/4/1/medline PY - 1989/4/1/entrez SP - 176 EP - 8 JF - Danish medical bulletin JO - Dan Med Bull VL - 36 IS - 2 N2 - Glycaemic control on pump versus pen treatment was evaluated and the effects of optimised metabolic control on kidney function was studied in very long-term uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Ten otherwise healthy patients participated, age: 36.5 yr +/- 7.9, diabetes duration: 23.7 yr +/- 2.9, urinary albumin excretion (UAE): 5.8 micrograms/min x/ divided by 2.2, se-creatinine and blood pressure were normal and only background retinopathy was present. A 2 x 6 months randomised cross-over study was performed using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple injection technique (MIT). Glycaemic control was evaluated by a six point profile every two weeks and by measuring HbA1c monthly. At 0, 6 and 12 months, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) were measured by the constant infusion technique, and UAE by radioimmunoassay. Glycaemic control was significantly better on CSII as compared to MIT (p = 0.01) or pre-study conventional treatment (CT), p = 0.03, whereas there was no difference between MIT and CT. There was no change in kidney function during either treatment. Thus, in these very long-term uncomplicated patients, glycaemic control was significantly improved during CSII. In spite of this, no change was found in GFR, which might suggest that in long-standing diabetes, kidney function is unaltered by changes in metabolic control. SN - 0907-8916 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/2651031/Effect_of_pump_versus_pen_treatment_on_glycaemic_control_and_kidney_function_in_long_term_uncomplicated_insulin_dependent_diabetes_mellitus__IDDM__ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -