Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis.
Urolithiasis. 2016 Aug; 44(4):353-65.U

Abstract

The objective of the study was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the treatment of renal stone <2 cm. A systematic literature review was performed in April 2015 using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Chinese Biomedical Literature (CNKI and Wanfang) databases to identify relevant studies. All clinical trials were retrieved and their included references investigated. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of all included studies, and the eligible studies were included and analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 software. Six prospective randomized comparison trials and eight retrospective comparison trials were included, involving a total of 2348 patients. For renal stone 1-2 cm, F-URS technique provided a significantly higher stone-free rate (SFR) [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 2.35, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.65-3.34, P < 0.00001], lower auxiliary procedure rate (APR) [odds ratio (OR) 0.33, 95 % CI 0.22-0.50, P < 0.00001] and lower retreatment rate (RR) (OR 0.07, 95 % CI 0.01-0.37, P = 0.002). Similar results were found in the lower pole stone for 1-2 cm subgroup. For renal stone <1 cm, F-URS technique also showed a significantly higher SFR than ESWL (WMD = 2.13, 95 % CI 1.13-4.00, P = 0.02). F-URS is associated with higher SFR, lower APR and RR than ESWL. F-URS is a safe and effective procedure. It can successfully treat patients with stones for 1-2 cm, especially for lower pole stone, without increasing complications, operative time and hospital stay. F-URS can be used as an alternative treatment to ESWL in selected cases with larger renal stones. However, further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical School, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China. zhulijiemeta@hotmail.com.Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

26530230

Citation

Mi, Yuanyuan, et al. "Flexible Ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) With Holmium Laser Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) for Treatment of Renal Stone <2 Cm: a Meta-analysis." Urolithiasis, vol. 44, no. 4, 2016, pp. 353-65.
Mi Y, Ren K, Pan H, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(4):353-65.
Mi, Y., Ren, K., Pan, H., Zhu, L., Wu, S., You, X., Shao, H., Dai, F., Peng, T., Qin, F., Wang, J., & Huang, Y. (2016). Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis, 44(4), 353-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0832-y
Mi Y, et al. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) With Holmium Laser Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) for Treatment of Renal Stone <2 Cm: a Meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(4):353-65. PubMed PMID: 26530230.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis. AU - Mi,Yuanyuan, AU - Ren,Kewei, AU - Pan,Haiyan, AU - Zhu,Lijie, AU - Wu,Sheng, AU - You,Xiaoming, AU - Shao,Hongbao, AU - Dai,Feng, AU - Peng,Tao, AU - Qin,Feng, AU - Wang,Jian, AU - Huang,Yi, Y1 - 2015/11/04/ PY - 2015/05/30/received PY - 2015/10/20/accepted PY - 2015/11/5/entrez PY - 2015/11/5/pubmed PY - 2017/4/20/medline KW - Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy KW - Flexible ureterorenoscopy KW - Lower pole stone KW - Meta-analysis KW - Renal stone KW - Stone-free SP - 353 EP - 65 JF - Urolithiasis JO - Urolithiasis VL - 44 IS - 4 N2 - The objective of the study was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the treatment of renal stone <2 cm. A systematic literature review was performed in April 2015 using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Chinese Biomedical Literature (CNKI and Wanfang) databases to identify relevant studies. All clinical trials were retrieved and their included references investigated. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of all included studies, and the eligible studies were included and analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 software. Six prospective randomized comparison trials and eight retrospective comparison trials were included, involving a total of 2348 patients. For renal stone 1-2 cm, F-URS technique provided a significantly higher stone-free rate (SFR) [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 2.35, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.65-3.34, P < 0.00001], lower auxiliary procedure rate (APR) [odds ratio (OR) 0.33, 95 % CI 0.22-0.50, P < 0.00001] and lower retreatment rate (RR) (OR 0.07, 95 % CI 0.01-0.37, P = 0.002). Similar results were found in the lower pole stone for 1-2 cm subgroup. For renal stone <1 cm, F-URS technique also showed a significantly higher SFR than ESWL (WMD = 2.13, 95 % CI 1.13-4.00, P = 0.02). F-URS is associated with higher SFR, lower APR and RR than ESWL. F-URS is a safe and effective procedure. It can successfully treat patients with stones for 1-2 cm, especially for lower pole stone, without increasing complications, operative time and hospital stay. F-URS can be used as an alternative treatment to ESWL in selected cases with larger renal stones. However, further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings. SN - 2194-7236 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/26530230/Flexible_ureterorenoscopy__F_URS__with_holmium_laser_versus_extracorporeal_shock_wave_lithotripsy__ESWL__for_treatment_of_renal_stone_<2_cm:_a_meta_analysis_ L2 - https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0832-y DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -