Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Evaluating Sarconesiopsis magellanica blowfly-derived larval therapy and comparing it to Lucilia sericata-derived therapy in an animal model.
Acta Trop. 2016 Feb; 154:34-41.AT

Abstract

Larval therapy is used as alternative treatment for hard-to-heal chronic and infected wounds. Lucilia sericata is the most used blowfly species. However, it has been shown recently that Sarconesiopsis magellanica larval excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity; this blowfly belongs to the Calliphoridae family. The present work has dealt with evaluating larval therapy using S. magellanica on wounds induced in diabetic rabbits and its action was compared to the effect induced by L. sericata. Twelve New Zealand White rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) were used; they were divided into 4 groups, the first two being treated with larval therapy derived from both aforementioned necrophagous blowflies, an antibiotic was used in the third and the fourth was used as control. All the animals were wounded on the back and infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Samples of the secretion from each animal's infected wound were taken and sown on blood agar. The colony forming units were then counted. The PUSH scale was used for the macroscopic evaluation of the wounds. Bacterial control was encountered 48 h post-treatment in the treatments involving larval therapy and to a lesser extent with the antibiotic. Likewise, wound debridement was quicker and more efficient with larval therapy compared to the antibiotic group; however, wound closing time was 23 days in all treatments. The group treated with S. magellanica larvae had relatively quicker evolution until the proliferation phase and the start of maturation, even though there were no significant differences between both blowfly species evaluated here regarding treatments by the end of the treatment period. The present study has validated the diabetic rabbit model for inducing chronic wounds regarding larval therapy and has likewise confirmed the effectiveness of S. magellanica-derived larval therapy as an alternative for curing and healing wounds.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Medical and Forensic Entomology Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.Grupo de Investigaciones Microbiológicas-UR (GIMUR), Faculty of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.Medical and Forensic Entomology Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.Veterinary Medicine and Zootech Faculty, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.Veterinary Medicine and Zootech Faculty, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.Molecular Biology and Immunology Department, Fundación Instituto de Inmunología de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Basic Sciences Department, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.Medical and Forensic Entomology Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Bogotá, Colombia. Electronic address: felio.bello@uan.edu.co.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

26546725

Citation

Díaz-Roa, Andrea, et al. "Evaluating Sarconesiopsis Magellanica Blowfly-derived Larval Therapy and Comparing It to Lucilia Sericata-derived Therapy in an Animal Model." Acta Tropica, vol. 154, 2016, pp. 34-41.
Díaz-Roa A, Gaona MA, Segura NA, et al. Evaluating Sarconesiopsis magellanica blowfly-derived larval therapy and comparing it to Lucilia sericata-derived therapy in an animal model. Acta Trop. 2016;154:34-41.
Díaz-Roa, A., Gaona, M. A., Segura, N. A., Ramírez-Hernández, A., Cortés-Vecino, J. A., Patarroyo, M. A., & Bello, F. (2016). Evaluating Sarconesiopsis magellanica blowfly-derived larval therapy and comparing it to Lucilia sericata-derived therapy in an animal model. Acta Tropica, 154, 34-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.10.024
Díaz-Roa A, et al. Evaluating Sarconesiopsis Magellanica Blowfly-derived Larval Therapy and Comparing It to Lucilia Sericata-derived Therapy in an Animal Model. Acta Trop. 2016;154:34-41. PubMed PMID: 26546725.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluating Sarconesiopsis magellanica blowfly-derived larval therapy and comparing it to Lucilia sericata-derived therapy in an animal model. AU - Díaz-Roa,Andrea, AU - Gaona,María A, AU - Segura,Nidya A, AU - Ramírez-Hernández,Alejandro, AU - Cortés-Vecino,Jesús A, AU - Patarroyo,Manuel A, AU - Bello,Felio, Y1 - 2015/11/04/ PY - 2015/09/10/received PY - 2015/10/29/revised PY - 2015/10/31/accepted PY - 2015/11/8/entrez PY - 2015/11/8/pubmed PY - 2016/9/10/medline KW - Bacterial infection KW - Diabetes KW - Larval therapy KW - Lucilia sericata KW - Sarconesiopsis magellanica KW - Wound healing SP - 34 EP - 41 JF - Acta tropica JO - Acta Trop VL - 154 N2 - Larval therapy is used as alternative treatment for hard-to-heal chronic and infected wounds. Lucilia sericata is the most used blowfly species. However, it has been shown recently that Sarconesiopsis magellanica larval excretions and secretions have potent antibacterial activity; this blowfly belongs to the Calliphoridae family. The present work has dealt with evaluating larval therapy using S. magellanica on wounds induced in diabetic rabbits and its action was compared to the effect induced by L. sericata. Twelve New Zealand White rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) were used; they were divided into 4 groups, the first two being treated with larval therapy derived from both aforementioned necrophagous blowflies, an antibiotic was used in the third and the fourth was used as control. All the animals were wounded on the back and infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Samples of the secretion from each animal's infected wound were taken and sown on blood agar. The colony forming units were then counted. The PUSH scale was used for the macroscopic evaluation of the wounds. Bacterial control was encountered 48 h post-treatment in the treatments involving larval therapy and to a lesser extent with the antibiotic. Likewise, wound debridement was quicker and more efficient with larval therapy compared to the antibiotic group; however, wound closing time was 23 days in all treatments. The group treated with S. magellanica larvae had relatively quicker evolution until the proliferation phase and the start of maturation, even though there were no significant differences between both blowfly species evaluated here regarding treatments by the end of the treatment period. The present study has validated the diabetic rabbit model for inducing chronic wounds regarding larval therapy and has likewise confirmed the effectiveness of S. magellanica-derived larval therapy as an alternative for curing and healing wounds. SN - 1873-6254 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/26546725/Evaluating_Sarconesiopsis_magellanica_blowfly_derived_larval_therapy_and_comparing_it_to_Lucilia_sericata_derived_therapy_in_an_animal_model_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -