Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparing two metabolic profiling approaches (liquid chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry) for extra-virgin olive oil phenolic compounds analysis: A botanical classification perspective.
J Chromatogr A. 2016 Jan 08; 1428:267-79.JC

Abstract

Over the last decades, the phenolic compounds from virgin olive oil (VOO) have become the subject of intensive research because of their biological activities and their influence on some of the most relevant attributes of this interesting matrix. Developing metabolic profiling approaches to determine them in monovarietal virgin olive oils could help to gain a deeper insight into olive oil phenolic compounds composition as well as to promote their use for botanical origin tracing purposes. To this end, two approaches were comparatively investigated (LC-ESI-TOF MS and GC-APCI-TOF MS) to evaluate their capacity to properly classify 25 olive oil samples belonging to five different varieties (Arbequina, Cornicabra, Hojiblanca, Frantoio and Picual), using the entire chromatographic phenolic profiles combined to chemometrics (principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)). The application of PCA to LC-MS and GC-MS data showed the natural clustering of the samples, seeing that 2 varieties were dominating the models (Arbequina and Frantoio), suppressing any possible discrimination among the other cultivars. Afterwards, PLS-DA was used to build four different efficient predictive models for varietal classification of the samples under study. The varietal markers pointed out by each platform were compared. In general, with the exception of one GC-MS model, all exhibited proper quality parameters. The models constructed by using the LC-MS data demonstrated superior classification ability.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Ave. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Ave. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Ave. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.Department of Food Science and Technology, CEBAS-CSIC, Murcia, Spain.Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Ave. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Chemistry, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation.Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, Ave. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain. Electronic address: alegriac@ugr.es.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

26554295

Citation

Bajoub, Aadil, et al. "Comparing Two Metabolic Profiling Approaches (liquid Chromatography and Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry) for Extra-virgin Olive Oil Phenolic Compounds Analysis: a Botanical Classification Perspective." Journal of Chromatography. A, vol. 1428, 2016, pp. 267-79.
Bajoub A, Pacchiarotta T, Hurtado-Fernández E, et al. Comparing two metabolic profiling approaches (liquid chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry) for extra-virgin olive oil phenolic compounds analysis: A botanical classification perspective. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1428:267-79.
Bajoub, A., Pacchiarotta, T., Hurtado-Fernández, E., Olmo-García, L., García-Villalba, R., Fernández-Gutiérrez, A., Mayboroda, O. A., & Carrasco-Pancorbo, A. (2016). Comparing two metabolic profiling approaches (liquid chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry) for extra-virgin olive oil phenolic compounds analysis: A botanical classification perspective. Journal of Chromatography. A, 1428, 267-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.10.059
Bajoub A, et al. Comparing Two Metabolic Profiling Approaches (liquid Chromatography and Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry) for Extra-virgin Olive Oil Phenolic Compounds Analysis: a Botanical Classification Perspective. J Chromatogr A. 2016 Jan 8;1428:267-79. PubMed PMID: 26554295.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparing two metabolic profiling approaches (liquid chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry) for extra-virgin olive oil phenolic compounds analysis: A botanical classification perspective. AU - Bajoub,Aadil, AU - Pacchiarotta,Tiziana, AU - Hurtado-Fernández,Elena, AU - Olmo-García,Lucía, AU - García-Villalba,Rocío, AU - Fernández-Gutiérrez,Alberto, AU - Mayboroda,Oleg A, AU - Carrasco-Pancorbo,Alegría, Y1 - 2015/10/26/ PY - 2015/07/05/received PY - 2015/09/22/revised PY - 2015/10/14/accepted PY - 2015/11/12/entrez PY - 2015/11/12/pubmed PY - 2016/8/9/medline KW - Gas chromatography–atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation–time of flight mass spectrometry KW - Liquid chromatography–electrospray ionisation–time of flight mass spectrometry KW - Monovarietal extra-virgin olive oils KW - Multivariate analysis KW - Phenolic compounds KW - Varietal origin SP - 267 EP - 79 JF - Journal of chromatography. A JO - J Chromatogr A VL - 1428 N2 - Over the last decades, the phenolic compounds from virgin olive oil (VOO) have become the subject of intensive research because of their biological activities and their influence on some of the most relevant attributes of this interesting matrix. Developing metabolic profiling approaches to determine them in monovarietal virgin olive oils could help to gain a deeper insight into olive oil phenolic compounds composition as well as to promote their use for botanical origin tracing purposes. To this end, two approaches were comparatively investigated (LC-ESI-TOF MS and GC-APCI-TOF MS) to evaluate their capacity to properly classify 25 olive oil samples belonging to five different varieties (Arbequina, Cornicabra, Hojiblanca, Frantoio and Picual), using the entire chromatographic phenolic profiles combined to chemometrics (principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)). The application of PCA to LC-MS and GC-MS data showed the natural clustering of the samples, seeing that 2 varieties were dominating the models (Arbequina and Frantoio), suppressing any possible discrimination among the other cultivars. Afterwards, PLS-DA was used to build four different efficient predictive models for varietal classification of the samples under study. The varietal markers pointed out by each platform were compared. In general, with the exception of one GC-MS model, all exhibited proper quality parameters. The models constructed by using the LC-MS data demonstrated superior classification ability. SN - 1873-3778 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/26554295/Comparing_two_metabolic_profiling_approaches__liquid_chromatography_and_gas_chromatography_coupled_to_mass_spectrometry__for_extra_virgin_olive_oil_phenolic_compounds_analysis:_A_botanical_classification_perspective_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -