Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Nov; 25(11):811-4.JC

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the mean difference of arch dimensions (both intercanine and intermolar width) between cleft lip palate and normal class I occlusion group.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analytic study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, [Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS)], Karachi, from March 2012 to April 2013.

METHODOLOGY

Group 1 consisted of 32 subjects with complete repaired, non-syndromic unilateral and bilateral cleft lip palate. Group 2 consisted of 32 subjects with normal facial morphology and class I occlusion. Exclusion criteria were cleft lip palate subjects with systemic diseases, any arch expansion procedure, incomplete repaired palate, open fistulas, developmental or acquired craniofacial muscular deformities, autoimmune conditions, syndromes, endocrine abnormalities, neurological problems, or previous history of orthodontic treatment and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders, history of trauma, impacted or missing teeth, periodontally involved teeth, subdivision molar classification, skeletal base II and III with molar class I. The transverse width (intercanine and intermolar width) of dental casts was measured with the help of digital caliper. The intercanine width was measured between cusp tips of the canine while the intermolar width distance was measured between mesiobuccal cusp tips of first molars, and buccal grooves of the mandibular first molars in both cleft lip palate and normal class I occlusion group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Maxillary and mandibular intercanine width was found to be significantly reduced in cleft lip palate group (both unilateral and bilateral) as compared to normal class I occlusion group.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Orthodontics, Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi.Department of Orthodontics, Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

26577967

Citation

Wahaj, Aiyesha, and Imtiaz Ahmed. "Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group." Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, vol. 25, no. 11, 2015, pp. 811-4.
Wahaj A, Ahmed I. Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015;25(11):811-4.
Wahaj, A., & Ahmed, I. (2015). Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, 25(11), 811-4. https://doi.org/11.2015/JCPSP.811814
Wahaj A, Ahmed I. Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015;25(11):811-4. PubMed PMID: 26577967.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group. AU - Wahaj,Aiyesha, AU - Ahmed,Imtiaz, PY - 2014/10/11/received PY - 2015/09/11/accepted PY - 2015/11/19/entrez PY - 2015/11/19/pubmed PY - 2016/11/1/medline SP - 811 EP - 4 JF - Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP JO - J Coll Physicians Surg Pak VL - 25 IS - 11 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine the mean difference of arch dimensions (both intercanine and intermolar width) between cleft lip palate and normal class I occlusion group. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analytic study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, [Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS)], Karachi, from March 2012 to April 2013. METHODOLOGY: Group 1 consisted of 32 subjects with complete repaired, non-syndromic unilateral and bilateral cleft lip palate. Group 2 consisted of 32 subjects with normal facial morphology and class I occlusion. Exclusion criteria were cleft lip palate subjects with systemic diseases, any arch expansion procedure, incomplete repaired palate, open fistulas, developmental or acquired craniofacial muscular deformities, autoimmune conditions, syndromes, endocrine abnormalities, neurological problems, or previous history of orthodontic treatment and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders, history of trauma, impacted or missing teeth, periodontally involved teeth, subdivision molar classification, skeletal base II and III with molar class I. The transverse width (intercanine and intermolar width) of dental casts was measured with the help of digital caliper. The intercanine width was measured between cusp tips of the canine while the intermolar width distance was measured between mesiobuccal cusp tips of first molars, and buccal grooves of the mandibular first molars in both cleft lip palate and normal class I occlusion group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Maxillary and mandibular intercanine width was found to be significantly reduced in cleft lip palate group (both unilateral and bilateral) as compared to normal class I occlusion group. SN - 1681-7168 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/26577967/Comparison_of_Intercanine_and_Intermolar_Width_Between_Cleft_Lip_Palate_and_Normal_Class_I_Occlusion_Group_ L2 - http://www.diseaseinfosearch.org/result/1672 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -