Citation
Ruiz-de-Adana, María Soledad, et al. "Comparison Between a Multiple Daily Insulin Injection Regimen (basal Once-daily Glargine Plus Mealtime Lispro) and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (lispro) Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Metabolically Optimized Type 1 Diabetes Patients: a Randomized Open-labelled Parallel Study." Medicina Clinica, vol. 146, no. 6, 2016, pp. 239-46.
Ruiz-de-Adana MS, Dominguez-Lopez ME, Gonzalez-Molero I, et al. Comparison between a multiple daily insulin injection regimen (basal once-daily glargine plus mealtime lispro) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (lispro) using continuous glucose monitoring in metabolically optimized type 1 diabetes patients: A randomized open-labelled parallel study. Med Clin (Barc). 2016;146(6):239-46.
Ruiz-de-Adana, M. S., Dominguez-Lopez, M. E., Gonzalez-Molero, I., Machado, A., Martin, V., Cardona, I., de-la-Higuera, M., Tapia, M. J., Soriguer, F., Anarte, M. T., & Rojo-Martínez, G. (2016). Comparison between a multiple daily insulin injection regimen (basal once-daily glargine plus mealtime lispro) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (lispro) using continuous glucose monitoring in metabolically optimized type 1 diabetes patients: A randomized open-labelled parallel study. Medicina Clinica, 146(6), 239-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2015.09.020
Ruiz-de-Adana MS, et al. Comparison Between a Multiple Daily Insulin Injection Regimen (basal Once-daily Glargine Plus Mealtime Lispro) and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (lispro) Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Metabolically Optimized Type 1 Diabetes Patients: a Randomized Open-labelled Parallel Study. Med Clin (Barc). 2016 Mar 18;146(6):239-46. PubMed PMID: 26656958.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between a multiple daily insulin injection regimen (basal once-daily glargine plus mealtime lispro) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (lispro) using continuous glucose monitoring in metabolically optimized type 1 diabetes patients: A randomized open-labelled parallel study.
AU - Ruiz-de-Adana,María Soledad,
AU - Dominguez-Lopez,Marta-Elena,
AU - Gonzalez-Molero,Inmaculada,
AU - Machado,Alberto,
AU - Martin,Victor,
AU - Cardona,Isabel,
AU - de-la-Higuera,Magdalena,
AU - Tapia,María-José,
AU - Soriguer,Federico,
AU - Anarte,María Teresa,
AU - Rojo-Martínez,Gemma,
Y1 - 2015/12/04/
PY - 2015/05/26/received
PY - 2015/08/25/revised
PY - 2015/09/03/accepted
PY - 2015/12/15/entrez
PY - 2015/12/15/pubmed
PY - 2016/12/24/medline
KW - CSII
KW - Diabetes tipo 1
KW - ISCI
KW - MDI
KW - Type 1 diabetes
SP - 239
EP - 46
JF - Medicina clinica
JO - Med Clin (Barc)
VL - 146
IS - 6
N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Advantages of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) over multiple daily injections with glargine (MDI/G) are still uncertain. We compared CSII vs. MDI/G therapy in unselected patients with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGSM). The primary end-points were glycaemic control and quality of life (QOL). METHODS: A total of 45 patients with long-term diabetes and mean HbA1c values of 8.6±1.8% (70.5±15.4mmol/mol), previously treated with MDI/NPH, were switched to MDI/G for 6 months and then, unfulfilling therapy CSII indication, were randomly assigned to CSII or MDI/G for another six months. We evaluated QOL (EsDqol) and glycaemic control by measuring HbA1c levels, rate of hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis and CGSM data. RESULTS: After the first phase (MDI/NPH to MDI/G) there was a significant improvement in total EsDQOL (99.72±18.38 vs. 92.07±17.65; p<0.028), a 0.5% decrease in HbA1c values (8.4±1.2 vs. 7.9±0.7% [68±9.7 vs. 63±5.5mmol/mol]; p<0.032), an improvement in glycaemic variability (standard deviation 66.9±14 vs. 59.4±16mg/dl; p<0.05), a decrease in insulin requirements (0.87±0.29 vs. 0.80±0.25U/kg; p<0.049), a decrease in number of severe hypoglycaemia episodes (0.44±0.9 vs. 0.05±0.2; p<0.014), and an increase in periods of normoglycaemia measured with CGSM (15.8±10.9% vs. 23±18.4%; p<0.003). Six months after randomization, significant improvements were seen in the HbA1c (7.9±0.7 vs. 7±0.6% [63±5.5 vs. 53±4.5mmol/mol]; p<0.001) and EsQOL (91.66±22 vs. 84.53±1.63; p<0.045) only in the CSII group. The HbA1c value was significantly lower when compared with the MDI/G group (CSII 7±0.6% [53±4.5mmol/mol] vs. MDI/G 7.6±0.9% [59.6±7.7mmol/mol]; p<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive insulin therapy with CSII vs. MDI/G was associated with better levels of HbA1c in patients with long-term type 1 diabetes.
SN - 1578-8989
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/26656958/Comparison_between_a_multiple_daily_insulin_injection_regimen__basal_once_daily_glargine_plus_mealtime_lispro__and_continuous_subcutaneous_insulin_infusion__lispro__using_continuous_glucose_monitoring_in_metabolically_optimized_type_1_diabetes_patients:_A_randomized_open_labelled_parallel_study_
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -