Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Randomized controlled trial comparing a powered toothbrush with distinct multi-directional cleaning action to a manual flat trim toothbrush.
Am J Dent 2015; 28(6):351-6AJ

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the plaque and gingivitis efficacy of a power toothbrush with distinct multi-directional cleaning action (Colgate® ProClinical® A1500 Power Toothbrush) against a manual flat-trim toothbrush (Oral-B Indicator).

METHODS

This randomized control trial was a single-center, examiner-blind, parallel-group, design and assessed plaque removal after a single brushing, as well as plaque removal and gingivitis reduction after 4 weeks and 12 weeks of brushing. Qualifying subjects used their assigned toothbrush to brush their teeth under supervision after which they were evaluated for plaque (post-brushing). Over the next 12 weeks, subjects brushed unsupervised at home with their assigned toothbrush. After 4 weeks and 12 weeks, subjects returned to the center for plaque and gingivitis examinations.

RESULTS

80 subjects were screened for eligibility and randomized into the study. 79 subjects completed the study. Both toothbrushes provided statistically significant reductions in all plaque index scores at all time points in comparison to the pre-brushing scores. After 4 weeks and 12 weeks, statistically significant reductions in gingivitis and gingivitis severity scores were observed for subjects using the power toothbrush, whereas statistically significant increases in gingivitis and gingivitis severity were observed for subjects using the manual toothbrush. In conclusion, relative to the manual toothbrush, the power toothbrush provided statistically significantly (P < 0.05) greater removal of plaque: whole-mouth (131%), gumline (97.4%), and interproximal (220%), as well as reductions in gingivitis (400%), and gingivitis severity (320%) after 12 weeks of use. Compared to the manual flat-trim toothbrush, the power toothbrush with distinct multi-directional cleaning action demonstrates statistically and clinically significantly greater levels of plaque removal and gingivitis reduction at all time points.

Authors

No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

26846042

Citation

Gallob, John, et al. "Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Powered Toothbrush With Distinct Multi-directional Cleaning Action to a Manual Flat Trim Toothbrush." American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 6, 2015, pp. 351-6.
Gallob J, Mateo LR, Chaknis P, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing a powered toothbrush with distinct multi-directional cleaning action to a manual flat trim toothbrush. Am J Dent. 2015;28(6):351-6.
Gallob, J., Mateo, L. R., Chaknis, P., Morrison, B. M., & Panagakos, F. (2015). Randomized controlled trial comparing a powered toothbrush with distinct multi-directional cleaning action to a manual flat trim toothbrush. American Journal of Dentistry, 28(6), pp. 351-6.
Gallob J, et al. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Powered Toothbrush With Distinct Multi-directional Cleaning Action to a Manual Flat Trim Toothbrush. Am J Dent. 2015;28(6):351-6. PubMed PMID: 26846042.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Randomized controlled trial comparing a powered toothbrush with distinct multi-directional cleaning action to a manual flat trim toothbrush. AU - Gallob,John, AU - Mateo,Luis R, AU - Chaknis,Patricia, AU - Morrison,Boyce M,Jr AU - Panagakos,Fotinos, PY - 2016/2/6/entrez PY - 2016/2/6/pubmed PY - 2016/2/26/medline SP - 351 EP - 6 JF - American journal of dentistry JO - Am J Dent VL - 28 IS - 6 N2 - PURPOSE: To compare the plaque and gingivitis efficacy of a power toothbrush with distinct multi-directional cleaning action (Colgate® ProClinical® A1500 Power Toothbrush) against a manual flat-trim toothbrush (Oral-B Indicator). METHODS: This randomized control trial was a single-center, examiner-blind, parallel-group, design and assessed plaque removal after a single brushing, as well as plaque removal and gingivitis reduction after 4 weeks and 12 weeks of brushing. Qualifying subjects used their assigned toothbrush to brush their teeth under supervision after which they were evaluated for plaque (post-brushing). Over the next 12 weeks, subjects brushed unsupervised at home with their assigned toothbrush. After 4 weeks and 12 weeks, subjects returned to the center for plaque and gingivitis examinations. RESULTS: 80 subjects were screened for eligibility and randomized into the study. 79 subjects completed the study. Both toothbrushes provided statistically significant reductions in all plaque index scores at all time points in comparison to the pre-brushing scores. After 4 weeks and 12 weeks, statistically significant reductions in gingivitis and gingivitis severity scores were observed for subjects using the power toothbrush, whereas statistically significant increases in gingivitis and gingivitis severity were observed for subjects using the manual toothbrush. In conclusion, relative to the manual toothbrush, the power toothbrush provided statistically significantly (P < 0.05) greater removal of plaque: whole-mouth (131%), gumline (97.4%), and interproximal (220%), as well as reductions in gingivitis (400%), and gingivitis severity (320%) after 12 weeks of use. Compared to the manual flat-trim toothbrush, the power toothbrush with distinct multi-directional cleaning action demonstrates statistically and clinically significantly greater levels of plaque removal and gingivitis reduction at all time points. SN - 0894-8275 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/26846042/Randomized_controlled_trial_comparing_a_powered_toothbrush_with_distinct_multi_directional_cleaning_action_to_a_manual_flat_trim_toothbrush_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -