Citation
van Donkelaar, Aaron, et al. "Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter Using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method With Information From Satellites, Models, and Monitors." Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 50, no. 7, 2016, pp. 3762-72.
van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Brauer M, et al. Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(7):3762-72.
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., Hsu, N. C., Kahn, R. A., Levy, R. C., Lyapustin, A., Sayer, A. M., & Winker, D. M. (2016). Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(7), 3762-72. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05833
van Donkelaar A, et al. Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter Using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method With Information From Satellites, Models, and Monitors. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Apr 5;50(7):3762-72. PubMed PMID: 26953851.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors.
AU - van Donkelaar,Aaron,
AU - Martin,Randall V,
AU - Brauer,Michael,
AU - Hsu,N Christina,
AU - Kahn,Ralph A,
AU - Levy,Robert C,
AU - Lyapustin,Alexei,
AU - Sayer,Andrew M,
AU - Winker,David M,
Y1 - 2016/03/24/
PY - 2016/3/9/entrez
PY - 2016/3/10/pubmed
PY - 2016/12/15/medline
SP - 3762
EP - 72
JF - Environmental science & technology
JO - Environ Sci Technol
VL - 50
IS - 7
N2 - We estimated global fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations using information from satellite-, simulation- and monitor-based sources by applying a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) to global geophysically based satellite-derived PM2.5 estimates. Aerosol optical depth from multiple satellite products (MISR, MODIS Dark Target, MODIS and SeaWiFS Deep Blue, and MODIS MAIAC) was combined with simulation (GEOS-Chem) based upon their relative uncertainties as determined using ground-based sun photometer (AERONET) observations for 1998-2014. The GWR predictors included simulated aerosol composition and land use information. The resultant PM2.5 estimates were highly consistent (R(2) = 0.81) with out-of-sample cross-validated PM2.5 concentrations from monitors. The global population-weighted annual average PM2.5 concentrations were 3-fold higher than the 10 μg/m(3) WHO guideline, driven by exposures in Asian and African regions. Estimates in regions with high contributions from mineral dust were associated with higher uncertainty, resulting from both sparse ground-based monitoring, and challenging conditions for retrieval and simulation. This approach demonstrates that the addition of even sparse ground-based measurements to more globally continuous PM2.5 data sources can yield valuable improvements to PM2.5 characterization on a global scale.
SN - 1520-5851
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/26953851/Global_Estimates_of_Fine_Particulate_Matter_using_a_Combined_Geophysical_Statistical_Method_with_Information_from_Satellites_Models_and_Monitors_
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -