Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners.
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 May-Jun; 29(3):277-83.IJ

Abstract

PURPOSE

The digitization of scanbodies on dental implants is required to use computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture processes for implant prosthetics. Little is known about the accuracy of scanbody digitization with intraoral scanners and dental lab scanners. This study aimed to examine the precision of different intraoral digital impression systems as well as a dental lab scanner using commercially available implant scanbodies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two study models with a different number and distribution of dental implant scanbodies were produced from conventional implant impressions. The study models were scanned using three different intraoral scanners (iTero, Cadent; Trios, 3Shape; and True Definition, 3M ESPE) and a dental lab scanner (D250, 3Shape). For each study model, 10 scans were performed per scanner to produce repeated measurements for the calculation of precision. The distance and angulation between the respective scanbodies were measured. The results of each scanning system were compared using analysis of variance, and post hoc Tukey test was conducted for a pairwise comparison of scanning devices.

RESULTS

The precision values of the scanbodies varied according to the distance between the scanbodies and the scanning device. A distance of a single tooth space and a jaw-traversing distance between scanbodies produced significantly different results for distance and angle measurements between the scanning systems (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The precision of intraoral scanners and the dental lab scanner was significantly different. The precision of intraoral scanners decreased with an increasing distance between the scanbodies, whereas the precision of the dental lab scanner was independent of the distance between the scanbodies.

Authors

No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

27148990

Citation

Flügge, Tabea V., et al. "Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners." The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 29, no. 3, 2016, pp. 277-83.
Flügge TV, Att W, Metzger MC, et al. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(3):277-83.
Flügge, T. V., Att, W., Metzger, M. C., & Nelson, K. (2016). Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 29(3), 277-83. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4417
Flügge TV, et al. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners. Int J Prosthodont. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):277-83. PubMed PMID: 27148990.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners. AU - Flügge,Tabea V, AU - Att,Wael, AU - Metzger,Marc C, AU - Nelson,Katja, PY - 2016/5/6/entrez PY - 2016/5/7/pubmed PY - 2016/7/16/medline SP - 277 EP - 83 JF - The International journal of prosthodontics JO - Int J Prosthodont VL - 29 IS - 3 N2 - PURPOSE: The digitization of scanbodies on dental implants is required to use computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture processes for implant prosthetics. Little is known about the accuracy of scanbody digitization with intraoral scanners and dental lab scanners. This study aimed to examine the precision of different intraoral digital impression systems as well as a dental lab scanner using commercially available implant scanbodies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two study models with a different number and distribution of dental implant scanbodies were produced from conventional implant impressions. The study models were scanned using three different intraoral scanners (iTero, Cadent; Trios, 3Shape; and True Definition, 3M ESPE) and a dental lab scanner (D250, 3Shape). For each study model, 10 scans were performed per scanner to produce repeated measurements for the calculation of precision. The distance and angulation between the respective scanbodies were measured. The results of each scanning system were compared using analysis of variance, and post hoc Tukey test was conducted for a pairwise comparison of scanning devices. RESULTS: The precision values of the scanbodies varied according to the distance between the scanbodies and the scanning device. A distance of a single tooth space and a jaw-traversing distance between scanbodies produced significantly different results for distance and angle measurements between the scanning systems (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The precision of intraoral scanners and the dental lab scanner was significantly different. The precision of intraoral scanners decreased with an increasing distance between the scanbodies, whereas the precision of the dental lab scanner was independent of the distance between the scanbodies. SN - 0893-2174 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/27148990/Precision_of_Dental_Implant_Digitization_Using_Intraoral_Scanners_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -