Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Quantitative and mixed analyses to identify factors that affect cervical cancer screening uptake among lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men.
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Dec; 25(23-24):3628-3642.JC

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to measure the prevalence of, and identify factors associated with, cervical cancer screening among a sample of lesbian, bisexual and queer women, and transgender men.

BACKGROUND

Past research has found that lesbian, bisexual and queer women underuse cervical screening service. Because deficient screening remains the most significant risk factor for cervical cancer, it is essential to understand the differences between routine and nonroutine screeners.

DESIGN

A convergent-parallel mixed methods design.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 21- to 65-year-old lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men were recruited in the USA from August-December 2014. Quantitative data were collected via a 48-item Internet questionnaire (N = 226), and qualitative data were collected through in-depth telephone interviews (N = 20) and open-ended questions on the Internet questionnaire.

RESULTS

Seventy-three per cent of the sample was routine cervical screeners. The results showed that a constellation of factors influence the use of cervical cancer screening among lesbian, bisexual and queer women. Some of those factors overlap with the general female population, whereas others are specific to the lesbian, bisexual or queer identity. Routine screeners reported feeling more welcome in the health care setting, while nonroutine screeners reported more discrimination related to their sexual orientation and gender expression. Routine screeners were also more likely to 'out' to their provider. The quantitative and qualitative factors were also compared and contrasted.

CONCLUSIONS

Many of the factors identified in this study to influence cervical cancer screening relate to the health care environment and to interactions between the patient and provider.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses should be involved with creating welcoming environments for lesbian, bisexual and queer women and their partners. Moreover, nurses play a large role in patient education and should promote self-care behaviours among lesbian women and transgender men.

Authors+Show Affiliations

School of Nursing, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.Department of Health Education, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA.College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

27240268

Citation

Johnson, Michael J., et al. "Quantitative and Mixed Analyses to Identify Factors That Affect Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Lesbian and Bisexual Women and Transgender Men." Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 25, no. 23-24, 2016, pp. 3628-3642.
Johnson MJ, Mueller M, Eliason MJ, et al. Quantitative and mixed analyses to identify factors that affect cervical cancer screening uptake among lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(23-24):3628-3642.
Johnson, M. J., Mueller, M., Eliason, M. J., Stuart, G., & Nemeth, L. S. (2016). Quantitative and mixed analyses to identify factors that affect cervical cancer screening uptake among lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(23-24), 3628-3642. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13414
Johnson MJ, et al. Quantitative and Mixed Analyses to Identify Factors That Affect Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Lesbian and Bisexual Women and Transgender Men. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(23-24):3628-3642. PubMed PMID: 27240268.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Quantitative and mixed analyses to identify factors that affect cervical cancer screening uptake among lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men. AU - Johnson,Michael J, AU - Mueller,Martina, AU - Eliason,Michele J, AU - Stuart,Gail, AU - Nemeth,Lynne S, Y1 - 2016/07/01/ PY - 2016/05/22/accepted PY - 2016/5/31/pubmed PY - 2017/2/25/medline PY - 2016/5/31/entrez KW - Papanicolaou test KW - cancer screening KW - cervical smears KW - cervix neoplasms KW - early detection of cancer KW - homosexuality KW - lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons KW - nursing SP - 3628 EP - 3642 JF - Journal of clinical nursing JO - J Clin Nurs VL - 25 IS - 23-24 N2 - AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to measure the prevalence of, and identify factors associated with, cervical cancer screening among a sample of lesbian, bisexual and queer women, and transgender men. BACKGROUND: Past research has found that lesbian, bisexual and queer women underuse cervical screening service. Because deficient screening remains the most significant risk factor for cervical cancer, it is essential to understand the differences between routine and nonroutine screeners. DESIGN: A convergent-parallel mixed methods design. METHODS: A convenience sample of 21- to 65-year-old lesbian and bisexual women and transgender men were recruited in the USA from August-December 2014. Quantitative data were collected via a 48-item Internet questionnaire (N = 226), and qualitative data were collected through in-depth telephone interviews (N = 20) and open-ended questions on the Internet questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-three per cent of the sample was routine cervical screeners. The results showed that a constellation of factors influence the use of cervical cancer screening among lesbian, bisexual and queer women. Some of those factors overlap with the general female population, whereas others are specific to the lesbian, bisexual or queer identity. Routine screeners reported feeling more welcome in the health care setting, while nonroutine screeners reported more discrimination related to their sexual orientation and gender expression. Routine screeners were also more likely to 'out' to their provider. The quantitative and qualitative factors were also compared and contrasted. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the factors identified in this study to influence cervical cancer screening relate to the health care environment and to interactions between the patient and provider. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses should be involved with creating welcoming environments for lesbian, bisexual and queer women and their partners. Moreover, nurses play a large role in patient education and should promote self-care behaviours among lesbian women and transgender men. SN - 1365-2702 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/27240268/Quantitative_and_mixed_analyses_to_identify_factors_that_affect_cervical_cancer_screening_uptake_among_lesbian_and_bisexual_women_and_transgender_men_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13414 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -