Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

State Legal Restrictions and Prescription-Opioid Use among Disabled Adults.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 07; 375(1):44-53.NEJM

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In response to rising rates of opioid abuse and overdose, U.S. states enacted laws to restrict the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances. The effect of these laws on opioid use is unclear.

METHODS

We tested associations between prescription-opioid receipt and state controlled-substances laws. Using Medicare administrative data for fee-for-service disabled beneficiaries 21 to 64 years of age who were alive throughout the calendar year (8.7 million person-years from 2006 through 2012) and an original data set of laws (e.g., prescription-drug monitoring programs), we examined the annual prevalence of beneficiaries with four or more opioid prescribers, prescriptions yielding a daily morphine-equivalent dose (MED) of more than 120 mg, and treatment for nonfatal prescription-opioid overdose. We estimated how opioid outcomes varied according to eight types of laws.

RESULTS

From 2006 through 2012, states added 81 controlled-substance laws. Opioid receipt and potentially hazardous prescription patterns were common. In 2012 alone, 47% of beneficiaries filled opioid prescriptions (25% in one to three calendar quarters and 22% in every calendar quarter); 8% had four or more opioid prescribers; 5% had prescriptions yielding a daily MED of more than 120 mg in any calendar quarter; and 0.3% were treated for a nonfatal prescription-opioid overdose. We observed no significant associations between opioid outcomes and specific types of laws or the number of types enacted. For example, the percentage of beneficiaries with a prescription yielding a daily MED of more than 120 mg did not decline after adoption of a prescription-drug monitoring program (0.27 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -0.05 to 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Adoption of controlled-substance laws was not associated with reductions in potentially hazardous use of opioids or overdose among disabled Medicare beneficiaries, a population particularly at risk. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others.).

Authors+Show Affiliations

From the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH (E.M., W.P., W.Z., A.J.O., N.E.M.); the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (E.M., J.R.H.); and the UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (J.R.H., L.M.).From the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH (E.M., W.P., W.Z., A.J.O., N.E.M.); the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (E.M., J.R.H.); and the UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (J.R.H., L.M.).From the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH (E.M., W.P., W.Z., A.J.O., N.E.M.); the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (E.M., J.R.H.); and the UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (J.R.H., L.M.).From the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH (E.M., W.P., W.Z., A.J.O., N.E.M.); the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (E.M., J.R.H.); and the UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (J.R.H., L.M.).From the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH (E.M., W.P., W.Z., A.J.O., N.E.M.); the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (E.M., J.R.H.); and the UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (J.R.H., L.M.).From the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH (E.M., W.P., W.Z., A.J.O., N.E.M.); the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (E.M., J.R.H.); and the UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (J.R.H., L.M.).From the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH (E.M., W.P., W.Z., A.J.O., N.E.M.); the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (E.M., J.R.H.); and the UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (J.R.H., L.M.).

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Language

eng

PubMed ID

27332619

Citation

Meara, Ellen, et al. "State Legal Restrictions and Prescription-Opioid Use Among Disabled Adults." The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 375, no. 1, 2016, pp. 44-53.
Meara E, Horwitz JR, Powell W, et al. State Legal Restrictions and Prescription-Opioid Use among Disabled Adults. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(1):44-53.
Meara, E., Horwitz, J. R., Powell, W., McClelland, L., Zhou, W., O'Malley, A. J., & Morden, N. E. (2016). State Legal Restrictions and Prescription-Opioid Use among Disabled Adults. The New England Journal of Medicine, 375(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1514387
Meara E, et al. State Legal Restrictions and Prescription-Opioid Use Among Disabled Adults. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 7;375(1):44-53. PubMed PMID: 27332619.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - State Legal Restrictions and Prescription-Opioid Use among Disabled Adults. AU - Meara,Ellen, AU - Horwitz,Jill R, AU - Powell,Wilson, AU - McClelland,Lynn, AU - Zhou,Weiping, AU - O'Malley,A James, AU - Morden,Nancy E, Y1 - 2016/06/22/ PY - 2016/6/23/entrez PY - 2016/6/23/pubmed PY - 2016/7/28/medline SP - 44 EP - 53 JF - The New England journal of medicine JO - N Engl J Med VL - 375 IS - 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: In response to rising rates of opioid abuse and overdose, U.S. states enacted laws to restrict the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances. The effect of these laws on opioid use is unclear. METHODS: We tested associations between prescription-opioid receipt and state controlled-substances laws. Using Medicare administrative data for fee-for-service disabled beneficiaries 21 to 64 years of age who were alive throughout the calendar year (8.7 million person-years from 2006 through 2012) and an original data set of laws (e.g., prescription-drug monitoring programs), we examined the annual prevalence of beneficiaries with four or more opioid prescribers, prescriptions yielding a daily morphine-equivalent dose (MED) of more than 120 mg, and treatment for nonfatal prescription-opioid overdose. We estimated how opioid outcomes varied according to eight types of laws. RESULTS: From 2006 through 2012, states added 81 controlled-substance laws. Opioid receipt and potentially hazardous prescription patterns were common. In 2012 alone, 47% of beneficiaries filled opioid prescriptions (25% in one to three calendar quarters and 22% in every calendar quarter); 8% had four or more opioid prescribers; 5% had prescriptions yielding a daily MED of more than 120 mg in any calendar quarter; and 0.3% were treated for a nonfatal prescription-opioid overdose. We observed no significant associations between opioid outcomes and specific types of laws or the number of types enacted. For example, the percentage of beneficiaries with a prescription yielding a daily MED of more than 120 mg did not decline after adoption of a prescription-drug monitoring program (0.27 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -0.05 to 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of controlled-substance laws was not associated with reductions in potentially hazardous use of opioids or overdose among disabled Medicare beneficiaries, a population particularly at risk. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others.). SN - 1533-4406 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/27332619/State_Legal_Restrictions_and_Prescription_Opioid_Use_among_Disabled_Adults_ L2 - https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMsa1514387?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -