Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Peer-instructed seminar attendance is associated with improved preparation, deeper learning and higher exam scores: a survey study.
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 09; 16:200.BM

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Active engagement in education improves learning outcomes. To enhance active participation in seminars, a student-centered course design was implemented and evaluated in terms of self-reported preparation, student motivation and exam scores. We hypothesized that small group learning with intensive peer interaction, using buzz-groups followed by plenary discussion, would motivate students to prepare seminar assignments at home and to actively engage in the seminars. Active engagement involved discussion of the preparatory assignments until consensus was reached.

METHODS

In total seven seminars were scheduled in a 10-week physiology course of an undergraduate Biomedical Sciences program. After each seminar, students were asked to fill out their perceptions of preparation and quality of the seminar (deepening of knowledge and confidence in answers) on a five-point scale using electronic questionnaires. Student motives were first collected using open questions. In the final questionnaire students were asked to indicate on a five-point scale how each motive was perceived. Students overall explanations why they had learned from seminars were collected via open questions in the final questionnaire. One hundred and twenty-four students of the cohort from November 2012 to February 2013 (82.6 %) voluntarily participated. Students' motives to prepare and attend seminars were analyzed by inspection of descriptive statistics. Linear regression analysis was conducted to relate student preparation to the quality of seminars, seminar attendance to exam scores, and exam scores to the quality of seminars. Answers to open questions were deductively clustered.

RESULTS

Studying the material, training for exams and comparing answers with peers motivated students to prepare the seminars. Students were motivated to participate actively because they wanted to keep track of correct answers themselves, to better understand the content and to be able to present their findings in plenary discussions. Perceived preparation of peers was positively associated with the perceived quality of seminars. Also, seminar attendance was positively associated with exam scores. Students' overall explanations suggest that discussing with peers and applying knowledge in pathophysiology cases underlies this association.

CONCLUSION

Discussion with well-prepared peers during seminars improves student perceptions of deeper learning and peer-instructed seminar attendance was associated with higher exam scores.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Medical Physiology, Division Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Yalelaan 50, 3584CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands. r.a.m.bouwmeester@umcutrecht.nl. Center for Education and Training, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. r.a.m.bouwmeester@umcutrecht.nl.Centre for Teaching and Learning, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Department of Medical Physiology, Division Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Yalelaan 50, 3584CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Center for Education and Training, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Validation Study

Language

eng

PubMed ID

27506461

Citation

Bouwmeester, Rianne A M., et al. "Peer-instructed Seminar Attendance Is Associated With Improved Preparation, Deeper Learning and Higher Exam Scores: a Survey Study." BMC Medical Education, vol. 16, 2016, p. 200.
Bouwmeester RA, de Kleijn RA, van Rijen HV. Peer-instructed seminar attendance is associated with improved preparation, deeper learning and higher exam scores: a survey study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:200.
Bouwmeester, R. A., de Kleijn, R. A., & van Rijen, H. V. (2016). Peer-instructed seminar attendance is associated with improved preparation, deeper learning and higher exam scores: a survey study. BMC Medical Education, 16, 200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0715-0
Bouwmeester RA, de Kleijn RA, van Rijen HV. Peer-instructed Seminar Attendance Is Associated With Improved Preparation, Deeper Learning and Higher Exam Scores: a Survey Study. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 9;16:200. PubMed PMID: 27506461.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Peer-instructed seminar attendance is associated with improved preparation, deeper learning and higher exam scores: a survey study. AU - Bouwmeester,Rianne A M, AU - de Kleijn,Renske A M, AU - van Rijen,Harold V M, Y1 - 2016/08/09/ PY - 2015/10/11/received PY - 2016/07/26/accepted PY - 2016/8/11/entrez PY - 2016/8/11/pubmed PY - 2017/2/25/medline KW - Active learning KW - Engagement KW - Participation KW - Small-group seminar learning KW - Student motives SP - 200 EP - 200 JF - BMC medical education JO - BMC Med Educ VL - 16 N2 - BACKGROUND: Active engagement in education improves learning outcomes. To enhance active participation in seminars, a student-centered course design was implemented and evaluated in terms of self-reported preparation, student motivation and exam scores. We hypothesized that small group learning with intensive peer interaction, using buzz-groups followed by plenary discussion, would motivate students to prepare seminar assignments at home and to actively engage in the seminars. Active engagement involved discussion of the preparatory assignments until consensus was reached. METHODS: In total seven seminars were scheduled in a 10-week physiology course of an undergraduate Biomedical Sciences program. After each seminar, students were asked to fill out their perceptions of preparation and quality of the seminar (deepening of knowledge and confidence in answers) on a five-point scale using electronic questionnaires. Student motives were first collected using open questions. In the final questionnaire students were asked to indicate on a five-point scale how each motive was perceived. Students overall explanations why they had learned from seminars were collected via open questions in the final questionnaire. One hundred and twenty-four students of the cohort from November 2012 to February 2013 (82.6 %) voluntarily participated. Students' motives to prepare and attend seminars were analyzed by inspection of descriptive statistics. Linear regression analysis was conducted to relate student preparation to the quality of seminars, seminar attendance to exam scores, and exam scores to the quality of seminars. Answers to open questions were deductively clustered. RESULTS: Studying the material, training for exams and comparing answers with peers motivated students to prepare the seminars. Students were motivated to participate actively because they wanted to keep track of correct answers themselves, to better understand the content and to be able to present their findings in plenary discussions. Perceived preparation of peers was positively associated with the perceived quality of seminars. Also, seminar attendance was positively associated with exam scores. Students' overall explanations suggest that discussing with peers and applying knowledge in pathophysiology cases underlies this association. CONCLUSION: Discussion with well-prepared peers during seminars improves student perceptions of deeper learning and peer-instructed seminar attendance was associated with higher exam scores. SN - 1472-6920 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/27506461/Peer_instructed_seminar_attendance_is_associated_with_improved_preparation_deeper_learning_and_higher_exam_scores:_a_survey_study_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -