Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A review of treatment modalities for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 12; 71(12):3340-3350.JA

Abstract

The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) has been a focus of international attention since its identification in 2012. Epidemiologically it is characterized by sporadic community cases, which are amplified by hospital-based outbreaks. Healthcare facilities in 27 countries from most continents have experienced imported cases, with the most significant outbreak involving 186 cases in Korea. The mortality internationally is 36% and guidance for clinical management has yet to be developed. Most facilities and healthcare providers outside of the Middle East receiving patients have no or little experience in the clinical management of MERS. When a case does occur there is likely little time for a critical appraisal of the literature and putative pharmacological options. We identified published literature on the management of both MERS-CoV and the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) through searches of PubMed and WHO and the US CDC websites up to 30 April 2016. A total of 101 publications were retrieved for critical appraisal. Most published literature on therapeutics for MERS are in vitro experiments, animal studies and case reports. Current treatment options for MERS can be categorized as: immunotherapy with virus-specific antibodies in convalescent plasma; polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies produced in vitro or in genetically modified animals; and antiviral agents. The use of any therapeutics in MERS-CoV remains investigational. The therapeutic agents with potential benefits and warranting further investigation include convalescent plasma, interferon-β/ribavirin combination therapy and lopinavir. Corticosteroids, ribavirin monotherapy and mycophenolic acid likely have toxicities that exceed potential benefits.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore. Division of Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.Division of Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore mdcfda@nus.edu.sg. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

27585965

Citation

Mo, Yin, and Dale Fisher. "A Review of Treatment Modalities for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome." The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 71, no. 12, 2016, pp. 3340-3350.
Mo Y, Fisher D. A review of treatment modalities for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(12):3340-3350.
Mo, Y., & Fisher, D. (2016). A review of treatment modalities for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 71(12), 3340-3350.
Mo Y, Fisher D. A Review of Treatment Modalities for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(12):3340-3350. PubMed PMID: 27585965.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A review of treatment modalities for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. AU - Mo,Yin, AU - Fisher,Dale, Y1 - 2016/09/01/ PY - 2016/9/3/pubmed PY - 2017/7/27/medline PY - 2016/9/3/entrez SP - 3340 EP - 3350 JF - The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy JO - J Antimicrob Chemother VL - 71 IS - 12 N2 - The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) has been a focus of international attention since its identification in 2012. Epidemiologically it is characterized by sporadic community cases, which are amplified by hospital-based outbreaks. Healthcare facilities in 27 countries from most continents have experienced imported cases, with the most significant outbreak involving 186 cases in Korea. The mortality internationally is 36% and guidance for clinical management has yet to be developed. Most facilities and healthcare providers outside of the Middle East receiving patients have no or little experience in the clinical management of MERS. When a case does occur there is likely little time for a critical appraisal of the literature and putative pharmacological options. We identified published literature on the management of both MERS-CoV and the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) through searches of PubMed and WHO and the US CDC websites up to 30 April 2016. A total of 101 publications were retrieved for critical appraisal. Most published literature on therapeutics for MERS are in vitro experiments, animal studies and case reports. Current treatment options for MERS can be categorized as: immunotherapy with virus-specific antibodies in convalescent plasma; polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies produced in vitro or in genetically modified animals; and antiviral agents. The use of any therapeutics in MERS-CoV remains investigational. The therapeutic agents with potential benefits and warranting further investigation include convalescent plasma, interferon-β/ribavirin combination therapy and lopinavir. Corticosteroids, ribavirin monotherapy and mycophenolic acid likely have toxicities that exceed potential benefits. SN - 1460-2091 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/27585965/A_review_of_treatment_modalities_for_Middle_East_Respiratory_Syndrome_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -