Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of indocyanine green angiography and optical coherence tomographic angiography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.
Eye (Lond). 2017 Jan; 31(1):45-52.E

Abstract

PurposeTo compare optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) images for detecting polypoidal lesions (PLs) and branching vascular networks (BVNs), and to measure the polypoidal areas (PAs) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).MethodsAll patients underwent ICGA, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCTA. We compared the detection sensitivity for PL and BVN, as evaluated by the ICGA and OCTA images. Furthermore, PA measured by ICGA was divided into two groups: one in which the area could be measured by OCTA (ICGA+OCTA+) and the other in which the area could not be measured by OCTA (ICGA+OCTA-).ResultsTwenty-one consecutive eyes of 21 patients (mean age, 73.8±9.8 years) were included. ICGA detected PL in all eyes (100%), whereas OCTA detected PL in 16 eyes (75.2%); ICGA detected BVN in 15 eyes (71.4%), whereas OCTA detected BVN in 20 eyes (95.2%). The mean PA in ICGA+OCTA+ and ICGA+OCTA- was 0.24±0.04 and 0.14±0.01 mm2, respectively; a significant difference was observed between ICGA+OCTA+ PA and ICGA+OCTA- PA (P<0.0001). In addition, the mean PA in the ICGA+OCTA+ group measured by ICGA and OCTA was 0.24±0.04 was 0.19±0.04 mm2, respectively; these values were significantly different (P=0.0046).ConclusionsOCTA might detect more BVNs and fewer PLs compared with ICGA, and PL detected by OCTA might be smaller than those detected by ICGA.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

27813526

Citation

Takayama, K, et al. "Comparison of Indocyanine Green Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy." Eye (London, England), vol. 31, no. 1, 2017, pp. 45-52.
Takayama K, Ito Y, Kaneko H, et al. Comparison of indocyanine green angiography and optical coherence tomographic angiography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(1):45-52.
Takayama, K., Ito, Y., Kaneko, H., Kataoka, K., Sugita, T., Maruko, R., Hattori, K., Ra, E., Haga, F., & Terasaki, H. (2017). Comparison of indocyanine green angiography and optical coherence tomographic angiography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Eye (London, England), 31(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.232
Takayama K, et al. Comparison of Indocyanine Green Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(1):45-52. PubMed PMID: 27813526.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of indocyanine green angiography and optical coherence tomographic angiography in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. AU - Takayama,K, AU - Ito,Y, AU - Kaneko,H, AU - Kataoka,K, AU - Sugita,T, AU - Maruko,R, AU - Hattori,K, AU - Ra,E, AU - Haga,F, AU - Terasaki,H, Y1 - 2016/11/04/ PY - 2016/05/24/received PY - 2016/09/14/accepted PY - 2016/11/5/pubmed PY - 2017/7/25/medline PY - 2016/11/5/entrez SP - 45 EP - 52 JF - Eye (London, England) JO - Eye (Lond) VL - 31 IS - 1 N2 - PurposeTo compare optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) images for detecting polypoidal lesions (PLs) and branching vascular networks (BVNs), and to measure the polypoidal areas (PAs) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).MethodsAll patients underwent ICGA, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCTA. We compared the detection sensitivity for PL and BVN, as evaluated by the ICGA and OCTA images. Furthermore, PA measured by ICGA was divided into two groups: one in which the area could be measured by OCTA (ICGA+OCTA+) and the other in which the area could not be measured by OCTA (ICGA+OCTA-).ResultsTwenty-one consecutive eyes of 21 patients (mean age, 73.8±9.8 years) were included. ICGA detected PL in all eyes (100%), whereas OCTA detected PL in 16 eyes (75.2%); ICGA detected BVN in 15 eyes (71.4%), whereas OCTA detected BVN in 20 eyes (95.2%). The mean PA in ICGA+OCTA+ and ICGA+OCTA- was 0.24±0.04 and 0.14±0.01 mm2, respectively; a significant difference was observed between ICGA+OCTA+ PA and ICGA+OCTA- PA (P<0.0001). In addition, the mean PA in the ICGA+OCTA+ group measured by ICGA and OCTA was 0.24±0.04 was 0.19±0.04 mm2, respectively; these values were significantly different (P=0.0046).ConclusionsOCTA might detect more BVNs and fewer PLs compared with ICGA, and PL detected by OCTA might be smaller than those detected by ICGA. SN - 1476-5454 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/27813526/Comparison_of_indocyanine_green_angiography_and_optical_coherence_tomographic_angiography_in_polypoidal_choroidal_vasculopathy_ L2 - https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.232 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -