Citation
Cornelisse, Vincent J., et al. "Concordance of Chlamydia Infections of the Rectum and Urethra in Same-sex Male Partnerships: a Cross-sectional Analysis." BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017, p. 22.
Cornelisse VJ, Sherman CJ, Hocking JS, et al. Concordance of chlamydia infections of the rectum and urethra in same-sex male partnerships: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):22.
Cornelisse, V. J., Sherman, C. J., Hocking, J. S., Williams, H., Zhang, L., Chen, M. Y., Bradshaw, C. S., Bellhouse, C., Fairley, C. K., & Chow, E. P. (2017). Concordance of chlamydia infections of the rectum and urethra in same-sex male partnerships: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases, 17(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2141-7
Cornelisse VJ, et al. Concordance of Chlamydia Infections of the Rectum and Urethra in Same-sex Male Partnerships: a Cross-sectional Analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 01 5;17(1):22. PubMed PMID: 28056825.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Concordance of chlamydia infections of the rectum and urethra in same-sex male partnerships: a cross-sectional analysis.
AU - Cornelisse,Vincent J,
AU - Sherman,Christopher J,
AU - Hocking,Jane S,
AU - Williams,Henrietta,
AU - Zhang,Lei,
AU - Chen,Marcus Y,
AU - Bradshaw,Catriona S,
AU - Bellhouse,Clare,
AU - Fairley,Christopher K,
AU - Chow,Eric P F,
Y1 - 2017/01/05/
PY - 2016/09/20/received
PY - 2016/12/20/accepted
PY - 2017/1/7/entrez
PY - 2017/1/7/pubmed
PY - 2017/9/5/medline
KW - Chlamydia
KW - Chlamydia trachomatis [B03.440.190.190.190.750]
KW - Couple
KW - Disease Transmission
KW - Dyad
KW - Homosexuality [F01.145.802.975.500]
KW - Infectious [N06.850.310]
KW - Men who have sex with men
KW - Partnership
KW - Sexual Partners [M01.778]
KW - Transmission
SP - 22
EP - 22
JF - BMC infectious diseases
JO - BMC Infect Dis
VL - 17
IS - 1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to describe the concordance of chlamydia infections of the rectum and urethra in men who have sex with men (MSM) and their male partners. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of chlamydia in MSM and their male sexual partners both attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC), Australia, between February 2011 and March 2015. We excluded partnerships where testing for chlamydia at both the rectum and urethra were not undertaken. RESULTS: Our study included 473 partnerships (946 men). 30 men had urethral chlamydia, of whom 14 (47%, 95% CI 28 to 66) had a partner with rectal chlamydia. 46 men had rectal chlamydia, of whom 14 (30%, 95% CI 18 to 46) had a partner with urethral chlamydia. The proportion of men with rectal chlamydia when their partner had urethral chlamydia was significantly higher than the proportion of men with urethral chlamydia when their partner had rectal chlamydia (McNemar's p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study of chlamydia concordance in male sexual partnerships and suggests that transmission of chlamydia between the urethra and rectum may be less efficient than has been reported for transmission between the urethra and cervix in heterosexual couples. It also suggests that transmission from the urethra to the rectum may be more efficient than in the opposite direction.
SN - 1471-2334
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/28056825/Concordance_of_chlamydia_infections_of_the_rectum_and_urethra_in_same_sex_male_partnerships:_a_cross_sectional_analysis_
L2 - https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-016-2141-7
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -