Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Electromyographic analysis of gluteus maximus and hamstring activity during the supine resisted hip extension exercise versus supine unilateral bridge to neutral.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 Feb; 33(2):124-130.PT

Abstract

Hip extension strengthening exercises which maximize gluteus maximus contributions and minimize hamstring influences may be beneficial for persons with hip pain. This study's aim was to compare muscle activation of the gluteus maximus and hamstrings from healthy subjects during a supine resisted hip extension exercise versus supine unilateral bridge to neutral. Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were obtained from the right gluteus maximus and hamstrings in 13 healthy male and 13 healthy female subjects. Maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) were collected to normalize data and permit meaningful comparisons across muscles. Peak median activation of the gluteus maximus was 33.8% MVIC for the bridge and 34.7% MVIC for the hip extension exercise, whereas peak median recruitment for hamstrings was 28.4% MVIC for the bridge and 51% MVIC for the hip extension exercise. The gluteus maximus to hamstrings ratio was compared between the two exercises using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test (α = 0.05). The ratio (p = 0.014) was greater in the supine unilateral bridge (median = 111.3%) than supine hip extension exercise (median = 59.2%), suggesting a reduction of hamstring recruitment in the unilateral bridge to neutral compared to the supine resisted hip extension exercise. The supine hip extension exercise demonstrated higher EMG activity of hamstrings in comparison with supine unilateral bridge and, therefore, may be less appropriate in subjects who need to increase gluteus maximus activation.

Authors+Show Affiliations

a Mayo Clinic School of Health Sciences , Rochester , MN , USA.b Winner Physical Therapy Inc ., Winner , SD , USA.c HonorHealth Shea Medical Campus , Scottsdale , AZ , USA.d Fairview Health Services , Pine City , MN , USA.a Mayo Clinic School of Health Sciences , Rochester , MN , USA.a Mayo Clinic School of Health Sciences , Rochester , MN , USA.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

28095102

Citation

Youdas, James W., et al. "Electromyographic Analysis of Gluteus Maximus and Hamstring Activity During the Supine Resisted Hip Extension Exercise Versus Supine Unilateral Bridge to Neutral." Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, vol. 33, no. 2, 2017, pp. 124-130.
Youdas JW, Hartman JP, Murphy BA, et al. Electromyographic analysis of gluteus maximus and hamstring activity during the supine resisted hip extension exercise versus supine unilateral bridge to neutral. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33(2):124-130.
Youdas, J. W., Hartman, J. P., Murphy, B. A., Rundle, A. M., Ugorowski, J. M., & Hollman, J. H. (2017). Electromyographic analysis of gluteus maximus and hamstring activity during the supine resisted hip extension exercise versus supine unilateral bridge to neutral. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 33(2), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2016.1271848
Youdas JW, et al. Electromyographic Analysis of Gluteus Maximus and Hamstring Activity During the Supine Resisted Hip Extension Exercise Versus Supine Unilateral Bridge to Neutral. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33(2):124-130. PubMed PMID: 28095102.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Electromyographic analysis of gluteus maximus and hamstring activity during the supine resisted hip extension exercise versus supine unilateral bridge to neutral. AU - Youdas,James W, AU - Hartman,James P, AU - Murphy,Brooke A, AU - Rundle,Ashley M, AU - Ugorowski,Jenna M, AU - Hollman,John H, Y1 - 2017/01/17/ PY - 2017/1/18/pubmed PY - 2017/7/18/medline PY - 2017/1/18/entrez KW - Electromyography KW - gluteus maximus KW - hamstrings SP - 124 EP - 130 JF - Physiotherapy theory and practice JO - Physiother Theory Pract VL - 33 IS - 2 N2 - Hip extension strengthening exercises which maximize gluteus maximus contributions and minimize hamstring influences may be beneficial for persons with hip pain. This study's aim was to compare muscle activation of the gluteus maximus and hamstrings from healthy subjects during a supine resisted hip extension exercise versus supine unilateral bridge to neutral. Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were obtained from the right gluteus maximus and hamstrings in 13 healthy male and 13 healthy female subjects. Maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) were collected to normalize data and permit meaningful comparisons across muscles. Peak median activation of the gluteus maximus was 33.8% MVIC for the bridge and 34.7% MVIC for the hip extension exercise, whereas peak median recruitment for hamstrings was 28.4% MVIC for the bridge and 51% MVIC for the hip extension exercise. The gluteus maximus to hamstrings ratio was compared between the two exercises using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test (α = 0.05). The ratio (p = 0.014) was greater in the supine unilateral bridge (median = 111.3%) than supine hip extension exercise (median = 59.2%), suggesting a reduction of hamstring recruitment in the unilateral bridge to neutral compared to the supine resisted hip extension exercise. The supine hip extension exercise demonstrated higher EMG activity of hamstrings in comparison with supine unilateral bridge and, therefore, may be less appropriate in subjects who need to increase gluteus maximus activation. SN - 1532-5040 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/28095102/Electromyographic_analysis_of_gluteus_maximus_and_hamstring_activity_during_the_supine_resisted_hip_extension_exercise_versus_supine_unilateral_bridge_to_neutral_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -