Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Engaging Institutional Review Boards in Developing a Brief, Community-Responsive Human Subjects Training for Community Partners.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016; 10(3):471-477.PC

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Engaging community partners as co-investigators in community-based participatory research (CBPR) requires certification in the rules, ethics, and principles governing research. Despite developments in making human research protection trainings more convenient and standardized (eg, self-paced Internet modules), time constraints and the structure of the content (which may favor academic audiences) may hinder the training of community partners.

OBJECTIVES

This paper is motivated by a case example in which academic and community partners, and stakeholders of a community-based organization actively engaged the leadership of a pediatric hospital-based institutional review board (IRB) in implementing a brief, community-responsive human subjects training session.

METHODS

A 2-hour, discussion-based human subjects training was developed via collaborations between the IRB and the community and academic partners. Interviews with trainees and facilitators after the training were used to evaluate its acceptability and possible future applications.

CONCLUSIONS

Local IRBs have the potential to assist community partners in building sufficient knowledge of human subjects research protections to engage in specific projects, thereby expediting the progress of vital research to address community needs. We propose the need for developing truncated human subjects education materials to train and certify community partners, and creating formally organized entities within academic and medical institutions that specialize in community-based research to guide the development and implementation of alternative human subjects training certification opportunities for community partners.

Authors

No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

28230554

Citation

Calzo, Jerel P., et al. "Engaging Institutional Review Boards in Developing a Brief, Community-Responsive Human Subjects Training for Community Partners." Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action, vol. 10, no. 3, 2016, pp. 471-477.
Calzo JP, Bogart LM, Francis E, et al. Engaging Institutional Review Boards in Developing a Brief, Community-Responsive Human Subjects Training for Community Partners. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):471-477.
Calzo, J. P., Bogart, L. M., Francis, E., Kornetsky, S. Z., Winkler, S. J., & Kaberry, J. (2016). Engaging Institutional Review Boards in Developing a Brief, Community-Responsive Human Subjects Training for Community Partners. Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action, 10(3), 471-477. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2016.0053
Calzo JP, et al. Engaging Institutional Review Boards in Developing a Brief, Community-Responsive Human Subjects Training for Community Partners. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):471-477. PubMed PMID: 28230554.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Engaging Institutional Review Boards in Developing a Brief, Community-Responsive Human Subjects Training for Community Partners. AU - Calzo,Jerel P, AU - Bogart,Laura M, AU - Francis,Evelyn, AU - Kornetsky,Susan Z, AU - Winkler,Sabune J, AU - Kaberry,Julie, PY - 2017/2/24/entrez PY - 2017/2/24/pubmed PY - 2017/6/16/medline SP - 471 EP - 477 JF - Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action JO - Prog Community Health Partnersh VL - 10 IS - 3 N2 - BACKGROUND: Engaging community partners as co-investigators in community-based participatory research (CBPR) requires certification in the rules, ethics, and principles governing research. Despite developments in making human research protection trainings more convenient and standardized (eg, self-paced Internet modules), time constraints and the structure of the content (which may favor academic audiences) may hinder the training of community partners. OBJECTIVES: This paper is motivated by a case example in which academic and community partners, and stakeholders of a community-based organization actively engaged the leadership of a pediatric hospital-based institutional review board (IRB) in implementing a brief, community-responsive human subjects training session. METHODS: A 2-hour, discussion-based human subjects training was developed via collaborations between the IRB and the community and academic partners. Interviews with trainees and facilitators after the training were used to evaluate its acceptability and possible future applications. CONCLUSIONS: Local IRBs have the potential to assist community partners in building sufficient knowledge of human subjects research protections to engage in specific projects, thereby expediting the progress of vital research to address community needs. We propose the need for developing truncated human subjects education materials to train and certify community partners, and creating formally organized entities within academic and medical institutions that specialize in community-based research to guide the development and implementation of alternative human subjects training certification opportunities for community partners. SN - 1557-0541 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/28230554/Engaging_Institutional_Review_Boards_in_Developing_a_Brief_Community_Responsive_Human_Subjects_Training_for_Community_Partners_ L2 - http://muse.jhu.edu/cgi-bin/resolve_openurl.cgi?issn=1557-0541&volume=10&issue=3&spage=471&aulast=Calzo DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -