TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative effectiveness and safety of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (biosimilars vs originators) in clinical practice: a population-based cohort study in Italy. AU - Trotta,Francesco, AU - Belleudi,Valeria, AU - Fusco,Danilo, AU - Amato,Laura, AU - Mecozzi,Alessandra, AU - Mayer,Flavia, AU - Sansone,Massimo, AU - Davoli,Marina, AU - Addis,Antonio, Y1 - 2017/03/10/ PY - 2017/3/12/entrez PY - 2017/3/12/pubmed PY - 2017/12/27/medline KW - Comparative effectiveness KW - biosimilar KW - cohort study KW - erythropoiesis-stimulating agents KW - real life data SP - e011637 EP - e011637 JF - BMJ open JO - BMJ Open VL - 7 IS - 3 N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefit/risk profile of epoetin α biosimilar with the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) originators when administered to naïve patients from clinical practice. DESIGN: Population-based observational cohort study. SETTING: All residents in the Lazio Region, Italy, with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or cancer retrieved from the Electronic Therapeutic Plan (ETP) Register for ESA between 2012 and 2014. PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 13 470 incident ESA users were available for the analysis, 8161 in the CKD and 5309 in the oncology setting, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: ESAs identified through the ATC B03XA were divided into 3 groups: (1) biosimilars; (2) epoetin α originator and (3) other originators. Patients were exposed to ESAs from the date of activation of the ETP, until the end of a 6-month follow-up period. OUTCOME MEASURES: Effectiveness (all-cause mortality and blood transfusion) and safety (major cardiovascular events, blood dyscrasia). A composite outcome including all-cause mortality, blood transfusion and major cardiovascular events was predefined. HRs of any outcome were estimated through Cox regression. RESULTS: We found no differences between patients on biosimilars or all originators with regard to the risk estimates of all-cause mortality, blood transfusion, major cardiovascular events and blood dyscrasia in the CKD setting. The composite outcome confirmed these results (biosimilars vs epoetin α originators: adjusted HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.33; biosimilars vs other originators: adjusted HR=1.09, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.41). Comparable risk estimates were observed between biosimilars and all originators in the oncology setting. CONCLUSIONS: In both settings, our findings are suggestive of no difference between biosimilars and originators on relevant effectiveness and safety outcomes. This study may contribute to settling future drug policy for the health services and provides reassurance on the approval pathway for biosimilars. The oncology setting merits further research, taking into account tumour types, tumour stage and anticancer chemotherapy administered. SN - 2044-6055 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/28283484/Comparative_effectiveness_and_safety_of_erythropoiesis_stimulating_agents__biosimilars_vs_originators__in_clinical_practice:_a_population_based_cohort_study_in_Italy_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -