Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Vicarious extinction learning during reconsolidation neutralizes fear memory.
Behav Res Ther. 2017 05; 92:87-93.BR

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that fear memories can be updated when recalled, a process referred to as reconsolidation. Given the beneficial effects of model-based safety learning (i.e. vicarious extinction) in preventing the recovery of short-term fear memory, we examined whether consolidated long-term fear memories could be updated with safety learning accomplished through vicarious extinction learning initiated within the reconsolidation time-window. We assessed this in a final sample of 19 participants that underwent a three-day within-subject fear-conditioning design, using fear-potentiated startle as our primary index of fear learning.

METHODS

On day 1, two fear-relevant stimuli (reinforced CSs) were paired with shock (US) and a third stimulus served as a control (CS). On day 2, one of the two previously reinforced stimuli (the reminded CS) was presented once in order to reactivate the fear memory 10 min before vicarious extinction training was initiated for all CSs. The recovery of the fear memory was tested 24 h later.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Vicarious extinction training conducted within the reconsolidation time window specifically prevented the recovery of the reactivated fear memory (p = 0.03), while leaving fear-potentiated startle responses to the non-reactivated cue intact (p = 0.62). These findings are relevant to both basic and clinical research, suggesting that a safe, non-invasive model-based exposure technique has the potential to enhance the efficiency and durability of anxiolytic therapies.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Nobels väg 11, Solna, Sweden; University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129, 1018 WS, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: armita.golkar@ki.se.University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129, 1018 WS, Amsterdam, Netherlands.University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129, 1018 WS, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

28286265

Citation

Golkar, Armita, et al. "Vicarious Extinction Learning During Reconsolidation Neutralizes Fear Memory." Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 92, 2017, pp. 87-93.
Golkar A, Tjaden C, Kindt M. Vicarious extinction learning during reconsolidation neutralizes fear memory. Behav Res Ther. 2017;92:87-93.
Golkar, A., Tjaden, C., & Kindt, M. (2017). Vicarious extinction learning during reconsolidation neutralizes fear memory. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 92, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.02.004
Golkar A, Tjaden C, Kindt M. Vicarious Extinction Learning During Reconsolidation Neutralizes Fear Memory. Behav Res Ther. 2017;92:87-93. PubMed PMID: 28286265.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Vicarious extinction learning during reconsolidation neutralizes fear memory. AU - Golkar,Armita, AU - Tjaden,Cathelijn, AU - Kindt,Merel, Y1 - 2017/02/22/ PY - 2016/10/11/received PY - 2017/01/17/revised PY - 2017/02/15/accepted PY - 2017/3/14/pubmed PY - 2017/9/30/medline PY - 2017/3/14/entrez KW - Fear-potentiated startle KW - Reconsolidation KW - Return of fear KW - Vicarious extinction SP - 87 EP - 93 JF - Behaviour research and therapy JO - Behav Res Ther VL - 92 N2 - BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that fear memories can be updated when recalled, a process referred to as reconsolidation. Given the beneficial effects of model-based safety learning (i.e. vicarious extinction) in preventing the recovery of short-term fear memory, we examined whether consolidated long-term fear memories could be updated with safety learning accomplished through vicarious extinction learning initiated within the reconsolidation time-window. We assessed this in a final sample of 19 participants that underwent a three-day within-subject fear-conditioning design, using fear-potentiated startle as our primary index of fear learning. METHODS: On day 1, two fear-relevant stimuli (reinforced CSs) were paired with shock (US) and a third stimulus served as a control (CS). On day 2, one of the two previously reinforced stimuli (the reminded CS) was presented once in order to reactivate the fear memory 10 min before vicarious extinction training was initiated for all CSs. The recovery of the fear memory was tested 24 h later. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Vicarious extinction training conducted within the reconsolidation time window specifically prevented the recovery of the reactivated fear memory (p = 0.03), while leaving fear-potentiated startle responses to the non-reactivated cue intact (p = 0.62). These findings are relevant to both basic and clinical research, suggesting that a safe, non-invasive model-based exposure technique has the potential to enhance the efficiency and durability of anxiolytic therapies. SN - 1873-622X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/28286265/Vicarious_extinction_learning_during_reconsolidation_neutralizes_fear_memory_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0005-7967(17)30039-6 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -