Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparing Smoking Topography and Subjective Measures of Usual Brand Cigarettes Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Smokers.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 09 04; 20(10):1243-1249.NT

Abstract

Introduction

Most pregnant smokers report abruptly reducing their cigarettes per day (CPD) by ~50% after learning of pregnancy and making further smaller reductions over the remainder of their pregnancy. Laboratory and naturalistic studies with non-pregnant smokers have found that these types of reductions often lead to changes in smoking topography (i.e., changes in smoking intensity to maintain a desired blood-nicotine level). If pregnant women smoke more intensely, they may expose themselves and their offspring to similar levels of toxicants despite reporting reductions in CPD.

Methods

Pregnant and non-pregnant female smokers (n = 20 and 89, respectively) participated. At the experimental session, after biochemical confirmation of acute abstinence, participants smoked one usual brand cigarette ad lib through a Borgwaldt CReSS Desktop Smoking Topography device. Carbon monoxide (CO) and measures of nicotine withdrawal, craving, and reinforcement derived from smoking were also collected.

Results

The two groups did not differ on demographic or smoking characteristics at screening, except nicotine metabolism rate, which as expected, was faster in pregnant smokers. Analyses suggest that none of the smoking topography parameters differed between pregnant and non-pregnant smokers, although pregnant smokers had a significantly smaller CO boost. Both groups reported similar levels of relief of withdrawal and craving after smoking, but other subjective effects suggest that pregnant smokers find smoking less reinforcing than non-pregnant smokers.

Conclusions

Pregnant smokers do not smoke cigarettes differently than non-pregnant women, but appear to find smoking comparatively less pleasurable.

Implications

This is the first study to assess smoking topography in pregnant women. Pregnant women appear to be at increased risk for smoking cigarettes with more intensity because of (1) their tendency to make significant abrupt reductions in the number of cigarettes they smoke each day after learning of pregnancy and (2) an increase in nicotine metabolism induced by pregnancy. Despite these changes, the present results suggest that pregnant women do not smoke cigarettes more intensely or in a way that causes more toxicant exposure, perhaps due to a reportedly less pleasurable smoking experience.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Joseph E. Hills Agricultural Science Building, Burlington, VT.Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Language

eng

PubMed ID

28658941

Citation

Bergeria, Cecilia L., et al. "Comparing Smoking Topography and Subjective Measures of Usual Brand Cigarettes Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Smokers." Nicotine & Tobacco Research : Official Journal of the Society for Research On Nicotine and Tobacco, vol. 20, no. 10, 2018, pp. 1243-1249.
Bergeria CL, Heil SH, Bunn JY, et al. Comparing Smoking Topography and Subjective Measures of Usual Brand Cigarettes Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(10):1243-1249.
Bergeria, C. L., Heil, S. H., Bunn, J. Y., Sigmon, S. C., & Higgins, S. T. (2018). Comparing Smoking Topography and Subjective Measures of Usual Brand Cigarettes Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research : Official Journal of the Society for Research On Nicotine and Tobacco, 20(10), 1243-1249. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx148
Bergeria CL, et al. Comparing Smoking Topography and Subjective Measures of Usual Brand Cigarettes Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 09 4;20(10):1243-1249. PubMed PMID: 28658941.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparing Smoking Topography and Subjective Measures of Usual Brand Cigarettes Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Smokers. AU - Bergeria,Cecilia L, AU - Heil,Sarah H, AU - Bunn,Janice Y, AU - Sigmon,Stacey C, AU - Higgins,Stephen T, PY - 2017/03/02/received PY - 2017/06/23/accepted PY - 2017/7/1/pubmed PY - 2019/9/19/medline PY - 2017/6/30/entrez SP - 1243 EP - 1249 JF - Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco JO - Nicotine Tob Res VL - 20 IS - 10 N2 - Introduction: Most pregnant smokers report abruptly reducing their cigarettes per day (CPD) by ~50% after learning of pregnancy and making further smaller reductions over the remainder of their pregnancy. Laboratory and naturalistic studies with non-pregnant smokers have found that these types of reductions often lead to changes in smoking topography (i.e., changes in smoking intensity to maintain a desired blood-nicotine level). If pregnant women smoke more intensely, they may expose themselves and their offspring to similar levels of toxicants despite reporting reductions in CPD. Methods: Pregnant and non-pregnant female smokers (n = 20 and 89, respectively) participated. At the experimental session, after biochemical confirmation of acute abstinence, participants smoked one usual brand cigarette ad lib through a Borgwaldt CReSS Desktop Smoking Topography device. Carbon monoxide (CO) and measures of nicotine withdrawal, craving, and reinforcement derived from smoking were also collected. Results: The two groups did not differ on demographic or smoking characteristics at screening, except nicotine metabolism rate, which as expected, was faster in pregnant smokers. Analyses suggest that none of the smoking topography parameters differed between pregnant and non-pregnant smokers, although pregnant smokers had a significantly smaller CO boost. Both groups reported similar levels of relief of withdrawal and craving after smoking, but other subjective effects suggest that pregnant smokers find smoking less reinforcing than non-pregnant smokers. Conclusions: Pregnant smokers do not smoke cigarettes differently than non-pregnant women, but appear to find smoking comparatively less pleasurable. Implications: This is the first study to assess smoking topography in pregnant women. Pregnant women appear to be at increased risk for smoking cigarettes with more intensity because of (1) their tendency to make significant abrupt reductions in the number of cigarettes they smoke each day after learning of pregnancy and (2) an increase in nicotine metabolism induced by pregnancy. Despite these changes, the present results suggest that pregnant women do not smoke cigarettes more intensely or in a way that causes more toxicant exposure, perhaps due to a reportedly less pleasurable smoking experience. SN - 1469-994X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/28658941/Comparing_Smoking_Topography_and_Subjective_Measures_of_Usual_Brand_Cigarettes_Between_Pregnant_and_Non_Pregnant_Smokers_ L2 - https://academic.oup.com/ntr/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ntr/ntx148 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -