Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Pesticide analysis in coffee leaves using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe approach and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: Optimization of the clean-up step.
J Chromatogr A. 2017 Aug 25; 1512:98-106.JC

Abstract

An analytical method using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) procedure for multi-residue determination of 52 pesticides in coffee leaf extractshas been developed and validated according to SANTE/11945/2015 guidelines. Different sorbent combinations for dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE) clean-up as well as dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) were tested. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for the recovery of 87-94% of pesticides added to coffee leaf extracts,was ≤20% for samples spiked at concentrations up to 50ng*g[-1] depending on the clean-up procedures. However, samples spiked with a 100ng*g[-1] pesticide mixture gave RSDs>20% for most pesticides when d-SPE was carried out adding Supelclean ENVI-Carb 120/400. To explain this fact,the secondary metabolic profile was analyzed in all the extraction and clean-up procedures. Only in the clean-up procedure with the addition of Supel QuE Z-Sep+, does caffeine show a constant adsorption between blank and spiked samples. In other clean-up procedures, the amount of caffeine was higher in those samples spiked with pesticides. This indicates competition between caffeine and pesticides for adsorption to the sorbent. Addition of Supel QuE Z-Sep+ to the procedure revealed only a 32% matrix effect, whereas using PSA+ C18 the matrix effect was close to 97%. The process efficiency is up to 54% with the addition of Supel QuE Z-Sep+ and just up to 7% for the other clean-up procedures. The method was successfully tested in coffee leaves from different types of cultivars. Pesticides were not detected in organic coffee leaf extracts, but thiametoxan was clearly detected in 50% of coffee leaf extracts harvested from coffee trees grown under traditional conditions as determined by UHPLC-TOFMSLC/QqTOF-MS/MS.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Food and Environmental Safety Research Group, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Valência, Av. Vicent Andrés Estelles, s/n, 46100, Burjassot, Valência, Spain; Departamento de Química Orgânica e Inorgânica, Universidade Federal do Ceará, CP 12200, 60451-970, Fortaleza, Brazil; Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: mariattre@hotmail.com.Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany.Food and Environmental Safety Research Group, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Valência, Av. Vicent Andrés Estelles, s/n, 46100, Burjassot, Valência, Spain.Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany.Food and Environmental Safety Research Group, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Valência, Av. Vicent Andrés Estelles, s/n, 46100, Burjassot, Valência, Spain.

Pub Type(s)

Evaluation Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

28720218

Citation

Trevisan, Maria Teresa Salles, et al. "Pesticide Analysis in Coffee Leaves Using a Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe Approach and Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Optimization of the Clean-up Step." Journal of Chromatography. A, vol. 1512, 2017, pp. 98-106.
Trevisan MTS, Owen RW, Calatayud-Vernich P, et al. Pesticide analysis in coffee leaves using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe approach and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: Optimization of the clean-up step. J Chromatogr A. 2017;1512:98-106.
Trevisan, M. T. S., Owen, R. W., Calatayud-Vernich, P., Breuer, A., & Picó, Y. (2017). Pesticide analysis in coffee leaves using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe approach and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: Optimization of the clean-up step. Journal of Chromatography. A, 1512, 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.07.033
Trevisan MTS, et al. Pesticide Analysis in Coffee Leaves Using a Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe Approach and Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Optimization of the Clean-up Step. J Chromatogr A. 2017 Aug 25;1512:98-106. PubMed PMID: 28720218.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Pesticide analysis in coffee leaves using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe approach and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: Optimization of the clean-up step. AU - Trevisan,Maria Teresa Salles, AU - Owen,Robert Wyn, AU - Calatayud-Vernich,Pau, AU - Breuer,Andrea, AU - Picó,Yolanda, Y1 - 2017/07/11/ PY - 2017/04/03/received PY - 2017/06/26/revised PY - 2017/07/10/accepted PY - 2017/7/20/pubmed PY - 2017/10/17/medline PY - 2017/7/20/entrez KW - Coffee leaves KW - Dispersive solid-phase clean-up KW - Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry KW - Matrix co-extractives KW - Pesticides KW - QuEChERS SP - 98 EP - 106 JF - Journal of chromatography. A JO - J Chromatogr A VL - 1512 N2 - An analytical method using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) procedure for multi-residue determination of 52 pesticides in coffee leaf extractshas been developed and validated according to SANTE/11945/2015 guidelines. Different sorbent combinations for dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE) clean-up as well as dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) were tested. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for the recovery of 87-94% of pesticides added to coffee leaf extracts,was ≤20% for samples spiked at concentrations up to 50ng*g[-1] depending on the clean-up procedures. However, samples spiked with a 100ng*g[-1] pesticide mixture gave RSDs>20% for most pesticides when d-SPE was carried out adding Supelclean ENVI-Carb 120/400. To explain this fact,the secondary metabolic profile was analyzed in all the extraction and clean-up procedures. Only in the clean-up procedure with the addition of Supel QuE Z-Sep+, does caffeine show a constant adsorption between blank and spiked samples. In other clean-up procedures, the amount of caffeine was higher in those samples spiked with pesticides. This indicates competition between caffeine and pesticides for adsorption to the sorbent. Addition of Supel QuE Z-Sep+ to the procedure revealed only a 32% matrix effect, whereas using PSA+ C18 the matrix effect was close to 97%. The process efficiency is up to 54% with the addition of Supel QuE Z-Sep+ and just up to 7% for the other clean-up procedures. The method was successfully tested in coffee leaves from different types of cultivars. Pesticides were not detected in organic coffee leaf extracts, but thiametoxan was clearly detected in 50% of coffee leaf extracts harvested from coffee trees grown under traditional conditions as determined by UHPLC-TOFMSLC/QqTOF-MS/MS. SN - 1873-3778 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/28720218/Pesticide_analysis_in_coffee_leaves_using_a_quick_easy_cheap_effective_rugged_and_safe_approach_and_liquid_chromatography_tandem_mass_spectrometry:_Optimization_of_the_clean_up_step_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -