Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Prolapse surgery with or without incontinence procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BJOG. 2018 Feb; 125(3):289-297.BJOG

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To reduce the risk of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (POSUI) prolapse repair might be combined with incontinence surgery.

OBJECTIVES

Compare efficacy and safety of prolapse surgery with and without incontinence surgery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Including our earlier review a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Register of Current Controlled Trials was performed from 1995 to 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing prolapse surgery with a midurethral sling (MUS) or Burch colposuspension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers selected eligible articles and extracted data. Stress urinary outcomes were pooled for preoperative SUI. Urgency incontinence and adverse events were pooled for incontinence procedure.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials were included. Women with preoperative SUI symptoms or occult SUI had a lower risk to undergo subsequent incontinence surgery for POSUI after vaginal prolapse surgery with a MUS than after prolapse surgery only: 0 versus 40% [relative risk (RR) 0.0; 95% CI 0.0-0.2] and 1 versus 15% (RR 0.1; 95% CI 0.0-0.6), respectively. These differences were not significant in continent women not tested for occult SUI or without occult SUI. Serious adverse events were more frequent after vaginal prolapse repair with MUS (14 versus 8%; RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7), but not after sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension. Combination surgery did not increase the risk of overactive bladder symptoms, urgency incontinence and surgery for voiding dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal prolapse repair with MUS reduced the risk of postoperative SUI in women with preoperative SUI symptoms or occult SUI, but serious adverse events were more frequent.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Less stress incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair with sling, but more adverse events.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Department of Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

28941138

Citation

van der Ploeg, J M., et al. "Prolapse Surgery With or Without Incontinence Procedure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 125, no. 3, 2018, pp. 289-297.
van der Ploeg JM, van der Steen A, Zwolsman S, et al. Prolapse surgery with or without incontinence procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2018;125(3):289-297.
van der Ploeg, J. M., van der Steen, A., Zwolsman, S., van der Vaart, C. H., & Roovers, J. (2018). Prolapse surgery with or without incontinence procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 125(3), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14943
van der Ploeg JM, et al. Prolapse Surgery With or Without Incontinence Procedure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. BJOG. 2018;125(3):289-297. PubMed PMID: 28941138.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Prolapse surgery with or without incontinence procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AU - van der Ploeg,J M, AU - van der Steen,A, AU - Zwolsman,S, AU - van der Vaart,C H, AU - Roovers,Jpwr, Y1 - 2017/11/13/ PY - 2017/9/9/accepted PY - 2017/9/25/pubmed PY - 2019/2/12/medline PY - 2017/9/24/entrez KW - Burch colposuspension KW - concomitant KW - meta-analysis KW - midurethral sling KW - occult KW - pelvic organ prolapse KW - review KW - stress urinary incontinence SP - 289 EP - 297 JF - BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology JO - BJOG VL - 125 IS - 3 N2 - BACKGROUND: To reduce the risk of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (POSUI) prolapse repair might be combined with incontinence surgery. OBJECTIVES: Compare efficacy and safety of prolapse surgery with and without incontinence surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: Including our earlier review a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Register of Current Controlled Trials was performed from 1995 to 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing prolapse surgery with a midurethral sling (MUS) or Burch colposuspension. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers selected eligible articles and extracted data. Stress urinary outcomes were pooled for preoperative SUI. Urgency incontinence and adverse events were pooled for incontinence procedure. MAIN RESULTS: Ten trials were included. Women with preoperative SUI symptoms or occult SUI had a lower risk to undergo subsequent incontinence surgery for POSUI after vaginal prolapse surgery with a MUS than after prolapse surgery only: 0 versus 40% [relative risk (RR) 0.0; 95% CI 0.0-0.2] and 1 versus 15% (RR 0.1; 95% CI 0.0-0.6), respectively. These differences were not significant in continent women not tested for occult SUI or without occult SUI. Serious adverse events were more frequent after vaginal prolapse repair with MUS (14 versus 8%; RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7), but not after sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension. Combination surgery did not increase the risk of overactive bladder symptoms, urgency incontinence and surgery for voiding dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal prolapse repair with MUS reduced the risk of postoperative SUI in women with preoperative SUI symptoms or occult SUI, but serious adverse events were more frequent. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Less stress incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair with sling, but more adverse events. SN - 1471-0528 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/28941138/Prolapse_surgery_with_or_without_incontinence_procedure:_a_systematic_review_and_meta_analysis_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -