Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study.
Eval Program Plann. 2018 02; 66:70-78.EP

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Collaborations between communities, healthcare practices and academic institutions are a strategy to address health disparities. Trust is critical in the development and maintaining of effective collaborations. The aim of this pilot study was to engage stakeholders in defining determinants of trust in community academic research partnerships and to develop a framework for measuring trust.

METHODS

The study was conducted by five collaborating National Institute of Health' Clinical and Translational Sciences Awardees. We used concept mapping to engage three stakeholders: community members, healthcare providers and academicians. We conducted hierarchical cluster analysis to assess the determinants of trust in community-academic research partnerships.

RESULTS

A total of 186 participants provided input generating 2,172 items that were consolidated into 125 unique items. A five cluster solution was defined: authentic, effective and transparent communication; mutually respectful and reciprocal relationships; sustainability; committed partnerships; and, communication, credibility and methodology to anticipate and resolve problems.

CONCLUSION

Results from this study contribute to an increasing empirical body of work to better understand and improve the underlying factors that contribute to building and sustaining trust in community academic research partnerships.

Links

PMC Free PDF

Authors+Show Affiliations

Dave G
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, United States. Electronic address: gjdave@unc.edu.
Frerichs L
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, United States.
Jones J
University of Pittsburgh, United States.
Kim M
Duke University, United States.
Schaal J
Partnerships Project Inc., United States.
Vassar S
University of California-Los Angeles, United States.
Varma D
University of Florida, United States.
Striley C
University of Florida, United States.
Ruktanonchai C
University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
Black A
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, United States.
Hankins J
University of Arkansas, United States.
Lovelady N
University of Arkansas, United States.
Cene C
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, United States.
Green M
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, United States.
Young T
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, United States.
Tiwari S
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, United States.
Cheney A
University of California-Riverside, United States.
Cottler L
University of Florida, United States.
Sullivan G
University of California-Riverside, United States.
Brown A
University of California-Los Angeles, United States.
Burke J
University of Pittsburgh, United States.
Corbie-Smith G
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, United States.

MeSH

CommunicationCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsCooperative BehaviorFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Pilot ProjectsResearch PersonnelTrustUnited StatesUniversities

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Multicenter Study

Language

eng

PubMed ID

29053983

Citation

Dave, Gaurav, et al. "Conceptualizing Trust in Community-academic Research Partnerships Using Concept Mapping Approach: a multi-CTSA Study." Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 66, 2018, pp. 70-78.
Dave G, Frerichs L, Jones J, et al. Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study. Eval Program Plann. 2018;66:70-78.
Dave, G., Frerichs, L., Jones, J., Kim, M., Schaal, J., Vassar, S., Varma, D., Striley, C., Ruktanonchai, C., Black, A., Hankins, J., Lovelady, N., Cene, C., Green, M., Young, T., Tiwari, S., Cheney, A., Cottler, L., Sullivan, G., ... Corbie-Smith, G. (2018). Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.007
Dave G, et al. Conceptualizing Trust in Community-academic Research Partnerships Using Concept Mapping Approach: a multi-CTSA Study. Eval Program Plann. 2018;66:70-78. PubMed PMID: 29053983.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study. AU - Dave,Gaurav, AU - Frerichs,Leah, AU - Jones,Jennifer, AU - Kim,Mimi, AU - Schaal,Jennifer, AU - Vassar,Stefanie, AU - Varma,Deepthi, AU - Striley,Catherine, AU - Ruktanonchai,Corrine, AU - Black,Adina, AU - Hankins,Jennifer, AU - Lovelady,Nakita, AU - Cene,Crystal, AU - Green,Melissa, AU - Young,Tiffany, AU - Tiwari,Shristi, AU - Cheney,Ann, AU - Cottler,Linda, AU - Sullivan,Greer, AU - Brown,Arleen, AU - Burke,Jessica, AU - Corbie-Smith,Giselle, Y1 - 2017/10/12/ PY - 2017/03/20/received PY - 2017/10/03/revised PY - 2017/10/06/accepted PY - 2017/10/21/pubmed PY - 2018/7/26/medline PY - 2017/10/21/entrez KW - CBPR KW - CTSA KW - Community Engagement KW - Community-Academic Partnerships KW - Community-Engaged Research KW - Concept Mapping KW - Evaluation KW - Research Outcomes KW - Translational Research KW - Trust SP - 70 EP - 78 JF - Evaluation and program planning JO - Eval Program Plann VL - 66 N2 - OBJECTIVES: Collaborations between communities, healthcare practices and academic institutions are a strategy to address health disparities. Trust is critical in the development and maintaining of effective collaborations. The aim of this pilot study was to engage stakeholders in defining determinants of trust in community academic research partnerships and to develop a framework for measuring trust. METHODS: The study was conducted by five collaborating National Institute of Health' Clinical and Translational Sciences Awardees. We used concept mapping to engage three stakeholders: community members, healthcare providers and academicians. We conducted hierarchical cluster analysis to assess the determinants of trust in community-academic research partnerships. RESULTS: A total of 186 participants provided input generating 2,172 items that were consolidated into 125 unique items. A five cluster solution was defined: authentic, effective and transparent communication; mutually respectful and reciprocal relationships; sustainability; committed partnerships; and, communication, credibility and methodology to anticipate and resolve problems. CONCLUSION: Results from this study contribute to an increasing empirical body of work to better understand and improve the underlying factors that contribute to building and sustaining trust in community academic research partnerships. SN - 1873-7870 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/29053983/Conceptualizing_trust_in_community_academic_research_partnerships_using_concept_mapping_approach:_A_multi_CTSA_study_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -