Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Examining Daily Electronic Cigarette Puff Topography Among Established and Nonestablished Cigarette Smokers in their Natural Environment.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 09 04; 20(10):1283-1288.NT

Abstract

Introduction

Understanding exposures and potential health effects of e-cigarettes is complex. Users' puffing behavior, or topography, affects function of e-cigarette devices (eg, coil temperature) and composition of their emissions. Users with different topographies are likely exposed to different amounts of any harmful or potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs). In this study, we compare e-cigarette topographies of established cigarette smokers and nonestablished cigarette smokers.

Methods

Data measuring e-cigarette topography were collected using a wireless hand-held monitoring device in users' everyday lives over 1 week. Young adult (aged 18-25) participants (N = 20) used disposable e-cigarettes with the monitor as they normally would and responded to online surveys. Topography characteristics of established versus nonestablished cigarette smokers were compared.

Results

On average, established cigarette smokers in the sample had larger first puff volume (130.9 mL vs. 56.0 mL, p < .05) and larger puff volume per session (1509.3 mL vs. 651.7 mL, p < .05) compared with nonestablished smokers. At marginal significance, they had longer sessions (566.3 s vs. 279.7 s, p = .06) and used e-cigarettes more sessions per day (5.3 s vs. 3.5 s, p = .14). Established cigarette smokers also used e-cigarettes for longer puff durations (3.3 s vs. 1.8 s, p < .01) and had larger puff volume (110.3 mL vs. 54.7 mL, p < .05) compared with nonestablished smokers. At marginal significance, they had longer puff interval (38.1 s vs. 21.7 s, p = .05).

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that topography characteristics differ by level of established cigarette smoking. This suggests that exposure to constituents of e-cigarettes depends on user characteristics and that specific topography parameters may be needed for different user populations when assessing e-cigarette health effects.

Implications

A user's topography affects his or her exposure to HPHCs. As this study demonstrates, user characteristics, such as level of smoking, can influence topography. Thus, it is crucial to understand the topography profiles of different user types to assess the potential for population harm and to identify potentially vulnerable populations. This study only looked at topography of cigarette smokers using disposable e-cigarettes. Further research is needed to better understand potential variation in e-cigarette topography and resulting exposures to HPHCs among users of different e-cigarette devices and liquids.

Authors+Show Affiliations

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY.

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Language

eng

PubMed ID

29059416

Citation

Lee, Youn Ok, et al. "Examining Daily Electronic Cigarette Puff Topography Among Established and Nonestablished Cigarette Smokers in Their Natural Environment." Nicotine & Tobacco Research : Official Journal of the Society for Research On Nicotine and Tobacco, vol. 20, no. 10, 2018, pp. 1283-1288.
Lee YO, Nonnemaker JM, Bradfield B, et al. Examining Daily Electronic Cigarette Puff Topography Among Established and Nonestablished Cigarette Smokers in their Natural Environment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(10):1283-1288.
Lee, Y. O., Nonnemaker, J. M., Bradfield, B., Hensel, E. C., & Robinson, R. J. (2018). Examining Daily Electronic Cigarette Puff Topography Among Established and Nonestablished Cigarette Smokers in their Natural Environment. Nicotine & Tobacco Research : Official Journal of the Society for Research On Nicotine and Tobacco, 20(10), 1283-1288. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx222
Lee YO, et al. Examining Daily Electronic Cigarette Puff Topography Among Established and Nonestablished Cigarette Smokers in Their Natural Environment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 09 4;20(10):1283-1288. PubMed PMID: 29059416.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Examining Daily Electronic Cigarette Puff Topography Among Established and Nonestablished Cigarette Smokers in their Natural Environment. AU - Lee,Youn Ok, AU - Nonnemaker,James M, AU - Bradfield,Brian, AU - Hensel,Edward C, AU - Robinson,Risa J, PY - 2016/12/16/received PY - 2017/09/28/accepted PY - 2017/10/24/pubmed PY - 2019/9/19/medline PY - 2017/10/24/entrez SP - 1283 EP - 1288 JF - Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco JO - Nicotine Tob Res VL - 20 IS - 10 N2 - Introduction: Understanding exposures and potential health effects of e-cigarettes is complex. Users' puffing behavior, or topography, affects function of e-cigarette devices (eg, coil temperature) and composition of their emissions. Users with different topographies are likely exposed to different amounts of any harmful or potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs). In this study, we compare e-cigarette topographies of established cigarette smokers and nonestablished cigarette smokers. Methods: Data measuring e-cigarette topography were collected using a wireless hand-held monitoring device in users' everyday lives over 1 week. Young adult (aged 18-25) participants (N = 20) used disposable e-cigarettes with the monitor as they normally would and responded to online surveys. Topography characteristics of established versus nonestablished cigarette smokers were compared. Results: On average, established cigarette smokers in the sample had larger first puff volume (130.9 mL vs. 56.0 mL, p < .05) and larger puff volume per session (1509.3 mL vs. 651.7 mL, p < .05) compared with nonestablished smokers. At marginal significance, they had longer sessions (566.3 s vs. 279.7 s, p = .06) and used e-cigarettes more sessions per day (5.3 s vs. 3.5 s, p = .14). Established cigarette smokers also used e-cigarettes for longer puff durations (3.3 s vs. 1.8 s, p < .01) and had larger puff volume (110.3 mL vs. 54.7 mL, p < .05) compared with nonestablished smokers. At marginal significance, they had longer puff interval (38.1 s vs. 21.7 s, p = .05). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that topography characteristics differ by level of established cigarette smoking. This suggests that exposure to constituents of e-cigarettes depends on user characteristics and that specific topography parameters may be needed for different user populations when assessing e-cigarette health effects. Implications: A user's topography affects his or her exposure to HPHCs. As this study demonstrates, user characteristics, such as level of smoking, can influence topography. Thus, it is crucial to understand the topography profiles of different user types to assess the potential for population harm and to identify potentially vulnerable populations. This study only looked at topography of cigarette smokers using disposable e-cigarettes. Further research is needed to better understand potential variation in e-cigarette topography and resulting exposures to HPHCs among users of different e-cigarette devices and liquids. SN - 1469-994X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/29059416/Examining_Daily_Electronic_Cigarette_Puff_Topography_Among_Established_and_Nonestablished_Cigarette_Smokers_in_their_Natural_Environment_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -